Advertisement

Mechanical Characteristics of Paraffin Wax-HTPB Based Hybrid Rocket Fuel

  • Sri Nithya MahottamanandaEmail author
  • P. N. Kadiresh
Conference paper
  • 31 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Paraffin wax has 3–4 times higher regression rate compared to conventional polymeric fuels used in hybrid rocket applications. Hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) suffers poor mechanical properties and has lower tensile strength, Young’s modulus compared to pure paraffin wax. The mechanical properties of HTPB can suitably be improved by mixing paraffin wax with HTPB. In this study, paraffin wax and HTPB are mixed with different weight ratios to form nine different compositions viz, 100P, 90P, 80P, 70P, 60P, 50P, 40P, 25P and 0P (where P denotes the percentage of paraffin wax and the remaining forms the HTPB system). To understand the effect of addition of paraffin wax with HTPB, nine fuel samples were prepared and experimentally tested for their mechanical properties. It is observed that addition of paraffin wax content in solid fuel composition increases maximum stress and Young’s modulus in the range of 16–74% and 15–97% respectively. It is also observed that addition of paraffin wax content in solid fuel composition decreases percentage of elongation by 98–57%. The surface morphology and chemical composition were examined using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) to understand the blending of paraffin wax + HTPB and to find out the occurrence of chemical reaction during mixing and curing processes.

Keywords

Mechanical properties Paraffin wax-HTPB based fuel Hybrid rocket fuel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Aeronautics Research and Development Board-DRDO.

References

  1. 1.
    Sutton GP, Biblarz O (2016) Rocket propulsion elements. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altman D Hybrid rocket development history. In: 27th joint propulsion conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    George P, Krishnan S, Varkey PM, Ravindran M, Ramachandran L (2001) Fuel regression rate in hydroxyl-terminated-polybutadiene/gaseous-oxygen hybrid rocket motors. J Propuls Power 17:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiaverini MJ, Serin N, Johnson DK, Lu Y-C, Kuo KK, Risha GA (2000) Regression rate behavior of hybrid rocket solid fuels. J Propuls Power 16:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jayapal SNM, Rafnaz M, Kadiresh PN (2018) Spray characteristics of plug type swirl injector. In: 2018 advances in science and engineering technology international conferences (ASET). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karabeyoglu A, Zilliac G, Cantwell BJ, DeZilwa S, Castellucci P (2004) Scale-up tests of high regression rate paraffin-based hybrid rocket fuels. J Propuls Power 20:1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zilliac G, Karabeyoglu M Hybrid rocket fuel regression rate data and modeling. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee T-S, Tsai H-L (2008) Combustion characteristics of a paraffin-based fuel hybrid rocket. In: 9th Asia-Pacific international symposium on combustion and energy utilization, pp 2–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahottamananda SN, Joshi PC (2016) Combustion study of HTPB–sugar hybrid fuel with gaseous oxygen. J Therm Anal Calorim 123:1927–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sinha YK, Sridhar BTN, Kishnakumar R (2016) Study of thermo-mechanical properties of HTPB–Paraffin solid fuel. Arab J Sci Eng. 41:4683–4690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sinha YK, Sridhar BTN, Santhosh M (2015) Thermal decomposition study of HTPB solid fuel in the presence of activated charcoal and paraffin. J Therm Anal Calorim 119:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maruyama S, Ishiguro T, Shinohara K, Nakagawa I Study on mechanical characteristics of paraffin-based fuel. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar R, Ramakrishna PA (2016) Studies on EVA-based wax fuel for launch vehicle applications. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 41:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim S, Moon H, Kim J, Cho J (2015) Evaluation of paraffin-polyethylene blends as novel solid fuel for hybrid rockets. J Propuls Power 31:1750–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DeSain J, Brady B, Metzler K, Curtiss T, Albright T Tensile tests of paraffin wax for hybrid rocket fuel grains. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sakote R, Yadav N, Karmakar S, Joshi PC, Chatterjee AK (2014) Regression rate studies of paraffin wax-HTPB hybrid fuels using swirl injectors. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 39:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarı A, Alkan C, Bilgin C (2014) Micro/nano encapsulation of some paraffin eutectic mixtures with poly(methyl methacrylate) shell: preparation, characterization and latent heat thermal energy storage properties. Appl Energy 136:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    You M, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhang L, Wang J (2011) Microencapsulated n-Octadecane with styrene-divinybenzene co-polymer shells. J Polym Res 18:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lv X, Zha M, Ma Z, Zhao F, Xu S, Xu H (2017) Fabrication, characterization, and combustion performance of Al/HTPB composite particles. Combust Sci Technol 189:312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringB.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations