Advertisement

A Review on Alternative Fuel Spray Characteristics

  • Qummare Azam
  • Ahmed M. Alhaj
  • Ayub A. Janvekar
  • Nurul Musfirah MazlanEmail author
Conference paper
  • 45 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Air transport is already a well-known transportation in assuring the need of worldwide social connection and commercial purposes. Nowadays huge demand on aviation fuel increases severe tense due to depletion of fossil fuel. Furthermore, the increases of greenhouse gas emission from the fossil fuel reduces the environment quality and human life. Hence, an attention towards alternative aviation fuel from renewable sources has become a priority as it could offer greener aviation. However alternative fuel must be compatible in comparison of the conventional fuel in terms of its physical properties such as viscosity, energy density, sustainability, affordability and availability. Those properties will affect spray characteristics and leads to combustion quality. Therefore, this study presents a review on the different alternative fuels and their compatibility in the aircraft engine. The importance of spray characteristic on the engine and different experimental approach to examine the spray characteristics of fuel particularly the penetration length, spray morphology, cone angle and atomization of the fuel also are presented. This work is beneficial in providing understanding on alternative fuels and spray atomization examination.

Keywords

Alternative fuel Spray characteristics Spray penetration Fuel blends 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University Grant (Grant No: 1001/PAERO/8014019) and USM Fellowship, for the support to this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Allouis C, Amoresano A, Capasso R, Langella G, Niola V, Quaremba G (2018) The impact of biofuel properties on emissions and performances of a micro gas turbine using combustion vibrations detection. Fuel Process Technol 179:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Habib Z, Parthasarathy R, Gollahalli S (2010) Performance and emission characteristics of biofuel in a small-scale gas turbine engine. Appl Energy 87:1701–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mendez CJ, Parthasarathy RN, Gollahalli SR (2014) Performance and emission characteristics of butanol/Jet A blends in a gas turbine engine. Appl Energy 118:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gawron B, Białecki T (2018) Impact of a Jet A-1/HEFA blend on the performance and emission characteristics of a miniature turbojet engine. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1501–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blakey S, Rye L, Wilson CW (2011) Aviation gas turbine alternative fuels: a review. Proc Combust Inst 33:2863–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yilmaz N, Atmanli A (2017) Sustainable alternative fuels in aviation. Energy 140:1378–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Milano J, Ong HC, Masjuki HH, Chong WT, Lam MK, Loh PK, Vellayan V (2016) Microalgae biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuel for power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:180–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang J, Xin Z, He Q, Corscadden K, Niu H (2019) An overview on performance characteristics of bio-jet fuels. Fuel 237:916–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson MB, Wen Z (2009) Production of biodiesel fuel from the Microalga schizochytrium limacinum by direct transesterification of algal biomass. Energy Fuels 23:5179–5183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahmes TF, Kinder JD, Henry TM, Crenfeldt G, LeDuc GF, Zombanakis GP, Abe Y, Lambert DM, Lewis C, Juenger JA (2009) Sustainable bio-derived synthetic paraffinic kerosene (Bio-SPK) jet fuel flights and engine tests program results. Report no AIAA 7002Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Starck L, Pidol L, Jeuland N, Chapus T, Bogers P, Bauldreay J (2016) Production of hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA)—optimisation of process yield. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev IFP Energies Nouvelles 71:10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kareddula VK, Puli RK (2018) Influence of plastic oil with ethanol gasoline blending on multi cylinder spark ignition engine. Alexandria Eng J 57:2585–2589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lefebvre AH, McDonell VG (2017) Atomization and sprays. 2nd edn. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jankowski A, Kowalski M (2015) Influence of the quality of fuel atomization on the emission of exhaust gases toxic components of combustion engines. J KONBiN 36Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gong J-S, Fu W-B (2007) The experimental study on the flow characteristics for a swirling gas–liquid spray atomizer. Appl Therm Eng 27:2886–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han I-S, Chung C-B, Riggs JB (2000) Modeling of a fluidized catalytic cracking process. Comput Chem Eng 24:1681–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu L, Luo F, Qi YY, Wei M, Ge JR, Liu WL, Li GL, Jen TC (2018) Effects of spray angle variation on mixing in a cold supersonic combustor with kerosene fuel. Acta Astronaut 144:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang C, Sahu A, Coratella C, Xu C, Saul J, Xu H (2019) Spray characteristics of a gasoline-diesel blend (ULG75) using high-speed imaging techniques. Fuel 239:677–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghahremani AR, Jafari M, Ahari M, Saidi MH, Hajinezhad A, Mozaffari AA (2018) Spray characteristics and atomization behavior of bio-diesel (Norouzak) and diesel fuel blends. Part Sci Technol 36:270–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou G, Zhou J, Fang Y, Yang X (2019) Properties effect of blending fischer-tropsch aviation fuel on spray performances. Energy 179:1082–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pan M, Huang R, Liao J, Jia C, Zhou X, Huang H, Huang X (2019) Experimental study of the spray, combustion, and emission performance of a diesel engine with high n-pentanol blending ratios. Energy Convers Manage 194:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee CS, Park SW, Kwon SI (2005) An experimental study on the atomization and combustion characteristics of biodiesel-blended fuels. Energy Fuels 19:2201–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bosch W (1966) The fuel rate indicator: a new measuring instrument for display of the characteristics of individual injection. SAE technical paper, 22Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geng L, Xie Y, Wang J, Liu W, Li C, Wang C (2019) Experimental and numerical analysis of the spray characteristics of biodiesel–ethanol fuel blends. Simulation, 1–12Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vouros A, Vouros A, Panidis T (2017) Spray characteristics of alternative aviation fuel blends. Aerospace 4:18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aerospace EngineeringUniversiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering CampusNibong TebalMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering CampusNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations