Advertisement

Reigning Technologies and Their Challenges for Antibiotics Removal

  • Chandrashekhar Bhagat
  • Manish KumarEmail author
  • Pranab Kumar Mohapatra
Chapter
  • 3 Downloads
Part of the Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering book series (STICEE)

Abstract

There has been an increase in demand for antibiotics due to the rapid growth of population. Antibiotics have been extensively and efficiently used in human, veterinary medicines, and several other purposes. Their potential benefits were recognized to increase the production of agriculture, animal husbandry, and aquaculture and to promote the growth of livestock. This increasing demand for antibiotics leads to their presence in the environment as contaminants, and hence, it results as a major source of contaminant. The long-term persistence of antibiotics residues in the environment cause severe effects on the various environmental components like human life, aquatic life, flora and fauna, the ecology of the compartment, etc. Hence, the removal of antibiotics contaminants is very important. There is a different method which can be used to remove antibiotics contaminants from water, like conventional and advanced treatment, sorption techniques, membrane processes, and ecological processes like constructed wetlands, integrated constructed wetland, etc. But there are major challenges in the removal of antibiotics contaminants from water because they are highly polar and have very low concentration, their no standard permissible limits defined by any organization in the world (as per the author review). This review gives an overview of antibiotics removal technologies and associated challenges.

References

  1. Acero JL, Benitez FJ, Teva F, Leal AI (2010) Retention of emerging micropollutants from UP water and a municipal secondary effluent by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. Chem Eng J 163(3):264–272Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed MJ, Theydan SK (2014) Fluoroquinolones antibiotics adsorption onto microporous activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass by microwave pyrolysis. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45(1):219–226Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M, Cho JS, Lee SE, Ok YS (2013) Trichloroethylene adsorption by pine needle biochars produced at various pyrolysis temperatures. Biores Technol 143:615–622Google Scholar
  4. Ahamad T, Chaudhary AA, Naushad M, Alshehri SM (2019) Fabrication of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles embedded chitosan-diphenylureaformaldehyde resin for the removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromol 134:180–188Google Scholar
  5. Aksu Z, Tunç Ö (2005) Application of biosorption for penicillin G removal: comparison with activated carbon. Process Biochem 40(2):831–847Google Scholar
  6. Alsager OA, Alnajrani MN, Abuelizz HA, Aldaghmani IA (2018) Removal of antibiotics from water and waste milk by ozonation: kinetics, byproducts, and antimicrobial activity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 158:114–122Google Scholar
  7. Andreozzi R, Canterino M, Giudice RL, Marotta R, Pinto G, Pollio A (2006) Lincomycin solar photodegradation, algal toxicity and removal from wastewaters by means of ozonation. Water Res 40(3):630–638Google Scholar
  8. Balakrishna K, Rath A, Praveenkumarreddy Y, Guruge KS, Subedi B (2017) A review of the occurrence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Indian water bodies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 137:113–120Google Scholar
  9. Balarak D, Mostafapour FK, Azarpira H (2016) Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions using Corylus avellana (Hazelnut) activated carbon. J Pharmaceutical Res Int 1–14Google Scholar
  10. Balcıoğlu IA, Ötker M (2003) Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing antibiotics by O3 and O3/H2O2 processes. Chemosphere, 50(1):85–95Google Scholar
  11. Batt AL, Aga DS (2005) Simultaneous analysis of multiple classes of antibiotics by ion trap LC/MS/MS for assessing surface water and groundwater contamination. Anal Chem 77(9):2940–2947Google Scholar
  12. Belhouchet N, Hamdi B, Chenchouni H, Bessekhouad Y (2019) Photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline antibiotic using new calcite/titania nanocomposites. J Photochem Photobiol A 372:196–205Google Scholar
  13. Ben W, Qiang Z, Pan X, Chen M (2009) Removal of veterinary antibiotics from sequencing batch reactor (SBR) pretreated swine wastewater by Fenton’s reagent. Water Res 43(17):4392–4402Google Scholar
  14. Ben W, Qiang Z, Pan X, Nie Y (2011) Degradation of veterinary antibiotics by ozone in swine wastewater pretreated with sequencing batch reactor. J Environ Eng 138(3):272–277Google Scholar
  15. Berglund B, Khan GA, Weisner SE, Ehde PM, Fick J, Lindgren PE (2014) Efficient removal of antibiotics in surface-flow constructed wetlands, with no observed impact on antibiotic resistance genes. Sci Total Environ 476:29–37Google Scholar
  16. Cao M, Wang P, Ao Y, Wang C, Hou J, Qian J (2016) Visible light activated photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by a magnetically separable composite photocatalyst: graphene oxide/magnetite/cerium-doped titania. J Colloid Interface Sci 467:129–139Google Scholar
  17. Chen C, Li J, Chen P, Ding R, Zhang P, Li X (2014) Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistances in soils from wastewater irrigation areas in Beijing and Tianjin, China. Environ Pollut 193:94–101Google Scholar
  18. Chen Y, Lan T, Duan L, Wang F, Zhao B, Zhang S, Wei W (2015) Adsorptive removal and adsorption kinetics of fluoroquinolone by nano-hydroxyapatite. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0145025Google Scholar
  19. Chen T, Luo L, Deng S, Shi G, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Deng O, Wang L, Zhang J, Wei L (2018) Sorption of tetracycline on H3PO4 modified biochar derived from rice straw and swine manure. Biores Technol 267:431–437Google Scholar
  20. Chen YY, Ma YL, Yang J, Wang LQ, Lv JM, Ren CJ (2017) Aqueous tetracycline degradation by H2O2 alone: removal and transformation pathway. Chem Eng J 307:15–23Google Scholar
  21. Chen F, Yang Q, Sun J, Yao F, Wang S, Wang Y, Wang X, Li X, Niu C, Wang D, Zeng G (2016a) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by AgI/BiVO4 heterojunction under visible-light irradiation: mineralization efficiency and mechanism. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(48):32887–32900Google Scholar
  22. Chen J, Wei XD, Liu YS, Ying GG, Liu SS, He LY, Su HC, Hu LX, Chen FR, Yang YQ (2016b) Removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from domestic sewage by constructed wetlands: Optimization of wetland substrates and hydraulic loading. Sci Total Environ 565:240–248Google Scholar
  23. Chen J, Ying GG, Wei XD, Liu YS, Liu SS, Hu LX, He LY, Chen ZF, Chen FR, Yang YQ (2016c) Removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from domestic sewage by constructed wetlands: effect of flow configuration and plant species. Sci Total Environ 571:974–982Google Scholar
  24. Ćurković L, Ašperger D, Babić S, Župan J (2019) Adsorption of enrofloxacin onto natural zeolite: Kinetics, thermodynamics, isotherms and error analysis. Indian J Chem Technol (IJCT) 25(6):565–571Google Scholar
  25. Cizmas L, Sharma VK, Gray CM, McDonald TJ (2015) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in waters: occurrence, toxicity, and risk. Environ Chem Lett 13(4):381–394Google Scholar
  26. Das R (2014) Application Photocatalysis for treatment of industrial waste water—a shortGoogle Scholar
  27. Das N, Patel AK, Deka G, Das A, Sarma KP, Kumar M (2015) Geochemical controls and future perspective of arsenic mobilization for sustainable groundwater management: A study from Northeast India. Groundwater Sustain Dev 1(1–2):92–104Google Scholar
  28. de Oliveira Carvalho C, Rodrigues DLC, Lima ÉC, Umpierres CS, Chaguezac DFC, Machado FM (2019) Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of ciprofloxacin by activated carbon produced from Jerivá (Syagrus romanzoffiana). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(5):4690–4702Google Scholar
  29. Dimitrakopoulou D, Rethemiotaki I, Frontistis Z, Xekoukoulotakis NP, Venieri D, Mantzavinos D (2012) Degradation, mineralization and antibiotic inactivation of amoxicillin by UV-A/TiO2 photocatalysis. J Environ Manage 98:168–174Google Scholar
  30. Diwan V, Tamhankar AJ, Khandal RK, Sen S, Aggarwal M, Marothi Y, Iyer RV, Sundblad-Tonderski K, Stålsby-Lundborg C (2010) Antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in waters associated with a hospital in Ujjain, India. BMC Publ Health 10(1):414Google Scholar
  31. Diwan V, Tamhankar AJ, Aggarwal M, Sen S, Khandal RK, Lundborg CS (2009) Detection of antibiotics in hospital effluents in India. Curr Sci 1752–1755Google Scholar
  32. Dong H, Yuan X, Wang W, Qiang Z (2016) Occurrence and removal of antibiotics in ecological and conventional wastewater treatment processes: a field study. J Environ Manage 178:11–19Google Scholar
  33. Elmolla ES, Chaudhuri M (2010a) Photocatalytic degradation of amoxicillin, ampicillin and cloxacillin antibiotics in aqueous solution using UV/TiO2 and UV/H2O2/TiO2 photocatalysis. Desalination 252(1–3):46–52Google Scholar
  34. Elmolla ES, Chaudhuri M (2010b) Degradation of amoxicillin, ampicillin and cloxacillin antibiotics in aqueous solution by the UV/ZnO photocatalytic process. J Hazard Mater 173(1–3):445–449Google Scholar
  35. Estevinho BN, Martins I, Ratola N, Alves A, Santos L (2007) Removal of 2, 4-dichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol from waters by sorption using coal fly ash from a Portuguese thermal power plant. J Hazard Mater 143(1–2):535–540Google Scholar
  36. Gao Y, Li Y, Zhang L, Huang H, Hu J, Shah SM, Su X (2012) Adsorption and removal of tetracycline antibiotics from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 368(1):540–546Google Scholar
  37. Giraldo AL, Penuela GA, Torres-Palma RA, Pino NJ, Palominos RA, Mansilla HD (2010) Degradation of the antibiotic oxolinic acid by photocatalysis with TiO2 in suspension. Water Res 44(18):5158–5167Google Scholar
  38. Goel S, Kurwadkar S, Zhang XJ, Ramirez D, Forrest LM (2015) Antibiotics in the environment: a review. In: Emerging micro-pollutants in the environment: occurrence, fate, and distribution. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 19–42Google Scholar
  39. Gogoi A, Mazumder P, Tyagi VK, Chaminda GT, An AK, Kumar M (2018) Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: a review. Groundwater Sustain Dev 6:169–180Google Scholar
  40. Gothwal R, Shashidhar T (2015) Antibiotic pollution in the environment: a review. Clean–Soil Air Water 43(4):479–489Google Scholar
  41. Homem V, Santos L (2011) Degradation and removal methods of antibiotics from aqueous matrices–a review. J Environ Manage 92(10):2304–2347Google Scholar
  42. Hu Y, Zhang T, Jiang L, Luo Y, Yao S, Zhang D, Lin K, Cui C (2019) Occurrence and reduction of antibiotic resistance genes in conventional and advanced drinking water treatment processes. Sci Total Environ 669:777–784Google Scholar
  43. Iakovides IC, Michael-Kordatou I, Moreira NFF, Ribeiro AR, Fernandes T, Pereira MFR, Nunes OC, Manaia CM, Silva AMT, Fatta-Kassinos D (2019) Continuous ozonation of urban wastewater: removal of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance genes and phytotoxicity. Water Res 159:333–347Google Scholar
  44. Ingerslev F, Halling-Sørensen B (2000) Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge. Environ Toxicol Chem Int J 19(10):2467–2473Google Scholar
  45. Jang HM, Yoo S, Choi YK, Park S, Kan E (2018a) Adsorption isotherm, kinetic modeling and mechanism of tetracycline on Pinus taeda-derived activated biochar. Biores Technol 259:24–31Google Scholar
  46. Jang HM, Yoo S, Park S, Kan E, Jang HM, Yoo S, Park S, Kan E (2018b) Engineered biochar from pine wood: characterization and potential application for removal of sulfamethoxazole in water. Environ Eng Res 24(4):608–617Google Scholar
  47. Kakavandi B, Bahari N, Kalantary RR, Fard ED (2019) Enhanced sono-photocatalysis of tetracycline antibiotic using TiO2 decorated on magnetic activated carbon (MAC@ T) coupled with US and UV: A new hybrid system. Ultrasonics SonochemistryGoogle Scholar
  48. Kang J, Zhou L, Duan X, Sun H, Wang S (2018) Catalytic degradation of antibiotics by metal-free catalysis over nitrogen-doped graphene. Catalysis TodayGoogle Scholar
  49. Karthikeyan KG, Meyer MT (2006) Occurrence of antibiotics in wastewater treatment facilities in Wisconsin, USA. Sci Total Environ 361(1–3):196–207Google Scholar
  50. Keen OS, Linden KG (2013) Degradation of antibiotic activity during UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation and photolysis in wastewater effluent. Environ Sci Technol 47(22):13020–13030Google Scholar
  51. Kirst H (2001) Antibiotics, macrolides. Kirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  52. Knight RL, Payne VW Jr, Borer RE, Clarke RA Jr, Pries JH (2000) Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecol Eng 15(1–2):41–55Google Scholar
  53. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, (1999–2000): a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36(6):1202–1211Google Scholar
  54. Kolpin DW, Skopec M, Meyer MT, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD (2004) Urban contribution of pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants to streams during differing flow conditions. Sci Total Environ 328(1–3):119–130Google Scholar
  55. Kotzerke A, Sharma S, Schauss K, Heuer H, Thiele-Bruhn S, Smalla K, Wilke BM, Schloter M (2008) Alterations in soil microbial activity and transformation processes due to sulfadiazine loads in pig-manure. Environ Pollut 153(2):315–322Google Scholar
  56. Kumar M, Das A, Das N, Goswami R, Singh UK (2016) Co-occurrence perspective of arsenic and fluoride in the groundwater of Diphu, Assam, Northeastern India. Chemosphere 150:227–238Google Scholar
  57. Kumar M, Furumai H, Kurisu F, Kasuga I (2010) Evaluating the mobile heavy metal pool in soakaway sediment, road dust and soil through sequential extraction and isotopic exchange. Water Sci Technol 62(4):920–928Google Scholar
  58. Kumar M, Chaminda T, Honda R, Furumai H (2019a) Vulnerability of urban waters to emerging contaminants in India and Sri Lanka: Resilience framework and strategy. APN Sci Bull 9(1)Google Scholar
  59. Kumar M, Ram B, Honda R, Poopipattana C, Canh VD, Chaminda T, Furumai H (2019b) Concurrence of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB), viruses, pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in ambient waters of Guwahati, India: urban vulnerability and resilience perspective. Sci Total Environ 133640Google Scholar
  60. Kümmerer K (2009a) Antibiotics in the aquatic environment–a review–part I. Chemosphere 75(4):417–434Google Scholar
  61. Kümmerer K (2009b) Antibiotics in the aquatic environment–a review–part II. Chemosphere 75(4):435–441Google Scholar
  62. Larsson DJ, de Pedro C, Paxeus N (2007) Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals. J Hazard Mater 148(3):751–755Google Scholar
  63. Leung HW, Minh TB, Murphy MB, Lam JC, So MK, Martin M, Lam PK, Richardson BJ (2012) Distribution, fate and risk assessment of antibiotics in sewage treatment plants in Hong Kong, South China. Environ Int 42:1–9Google Scholar
  64. Li G, Ben W, Ye H, Zhang D, Qiang Z (2018) Performance of ozonation and biological activated carbon in eliminating sulfonamides and sulfonamide-resistant bacteria: a pilot-scale study. Chem Eng J 341:327–334Google Scholar
  65. Li Y, Bi E, Chen H (2019) Effects of dissolved humic acid on fluoroquinolones sorption and retention to kaolinite. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 178:43–50Google Scholar
  66. Li D, Yang M, Hu J, Zhang Y, Chang H, Jin F (2008) Determination of penicillin G and its degradation products in a penicillin production wastewater treatment plant and the receiving river. Water Res 42(1–2):307–317Google Scholar
  67. Liu MK, Liu YY, Bao DD, Zhu G, Yang GH, Geng JF, Li HT (2017) Effective removal of tetracycline antibiotics from water using hybrid carbon membranes. Sci Rep 7:43717Google Scholar
  68. Liu P, Zhang H, Feng Y, Shen C, Yang F (2015) Integrating electrochemical oxidation into forward osmosis process for removal of trace antibiotics in wastewater. J Hazard Mater 296:248–255Google Scholar
  69. Mahmood AR, Al-Haideri HH, Hassan FM (2019) Detection of antibiotics in drinking water treatment plants in Baghdad City, Iraq. Adv Public HealthGoogle Scholar
  70. Martins AC, Pezoti O, Cazetta AL, Bedin KC, Yamazaki DA, Bandoch GF, Asefa T, Visentainer JV, Almeida VC (2015) Removal of tetracycline by NaOH-activated carbon produced from macadamia nut shells: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Chem Eng J 260:291–299Google Scholar
  71. Mohapatra S, Huang CH, Mukherji S, Padhye LP (2016) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceuticals in WWTPs in India and comparison with a similar study in the United States. Chemosphere 159:526–535Google Scholar
  72. Mutiyar PK, Mittal AK (2013) Occurrences and fate of an antibiotic amoxicillin in extended aeration-based sewage treatment plant in Delhi, India: a case study of emerging pollutant. Desalination Water Treatment 51(31–33):6158–6164Google Scholar
  73. Mutiyar PK, Mittal AK (2014) Risk assessment of antibiotic residues in different water matrices in India: key issues and challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(12):7723–7736Google Scholar
  74. Ötker HM, Akmehmet-Balcıoğlu I (2005) Adsorption and degradation of enrofloxacin, a veterinary antibiotic on natural zeolite. J Hazard Mater 122(3):251–258Google Scholar
  75. Pouretedal HR, Sadegh N (2014) Effective removal of amoxicillin, cephalexin, tetracycline and penicillin G from aqueous solutions using activated carbon nanoparticles prepared from vine wood. J Water Process Eng 1:64–73Google Scholar
  76. Prabhasankar VP, Joshua DI, Balakrishna K, Siddiqui IF, Taniyasu S, Yamashita N, Kannan K, Akiba M, Praveenkumarreddy Y, Guruge KS (2016) Removal rates of antibiotics in four sewage treatment plants in South India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(9):8679–8685Google Scholar
  77. Premarathna KSD, Rajapaksha AU, Sarkar B, Kwon EE, Bhatnagar A, Ok YS, Vithanage M (2019) Biochar-based engineered composites for sorptive decontamination of water: a review. Chem Eng J 372:536–550Google Scholar
  78. Putra EK, Pranowo R, Sunarso J, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2009) Performance of activated carbon and bentonite for adsorption of amoxicillin from wastewater: mechanisms, isotherms and kinetics. Water Res 43(9):2419–2430Google Scholar
  79. Qiang Z, Adams C (2004) Potentiometric determination of acid dissociation constants (pKa) for human and veterinary antibiotics. Water Res 38(12):2874–2890Google Scholar
  80. Rigos G, Nengas I, Alexis M, Troisi GM (2004) Potential drug (oxytetracycline and oxolinic acid) pollution from Mediterranean sparid fish farms. Aquat Toxicol 69(3):281–288Google Scholar
  81. Sacher F, Lange FT, Brauch HJ, Blankenhorn I (2001) Pharmaceuticals in groundwaters: analytical methods and results of a monitoring program in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. J Chromatography A 938(1–2):199–210Google Scholar
  82. Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall AB (2006) A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 65(5):725–759Google Scholar
  83. Shao L, Wu Z, Zeng L, Chen ZM, Zhou Y, Chen GQ (2013) Embodied energy assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland. Ecol Model 252:63–71Google Scholar
  84. Singh A, Patel AK, Kumar M (2020) Mitigating the risk of Arsenic and Fluoride contamination of groundwater through a multi-model framework of statistical assessment and natural remediation techniques. In: Kumar M, Snow D, Honda R (eds) Emerging issues in the water environment during Anthropocene: a South East Asian perspective, Springer Nature. ISBN 978-93-81891-41-4Google Scholar
  85. Singh A, Patel AK, Deka JP, Das A, Kumar A, Kumar M (2019) Prediction of Arsenic vulnerable zones in groundwater environment of rapidly urbanizing setup, Guwahati, India. Geochemistry 125590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2019.125590
  86. Southgate R, Osborne NF (2000) Carbapenems and penems. Kirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  87. Tao CW, Hsu BM, Ji WT, Hsu TK, Kao PM, Hsu CP, Shen SM, Shen TY, Wan TJ, Huang YL (2014) Evaluation of five antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment systems of swine farms by real-time PCR. Sci Total Environ 496:116–121Google Scholar
  88. Underwood JC, Harvey RW, Metge DW, Repert DA, Baumgartner LK, Smith RL, Roane TM, Barber LB (2011) Effects of the antimicrobial sulfamethoxazole on groundwater bacterial enrichment. Environ Sci Technol 45(7):3096–3101Google Scholar
  89. Von Gunten U (2003a) Ozonation of drinking water: Part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res 37(7):1443–1467Google Scholar
  90. Von Gunten U (2003b) Ozonation of drinking water: Part II. Disinfection and by-product formation in presence of bromide, iodide or chlorine. Water Res 37(7):1469–1487Google Scholar
  91. Wang CJ, Li Z, Jiang WT (2011) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin on 2: 1 dioctahedral clay minerals. Appl Clay Sci 53(4):723–728Google Scholar
  92. Watkinson AJ, Murby EJ, Costanzo SD (2007) Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Res 41(18):4164–4176Google Scholar
  93. Watkinson AJ, Murby EJ, Kolpin DW, Costanzo SD (2009) The occurrence of antibiotics in an urban watershed: from wastewater to drinking water. Sci Total Environ 407(8):2711–2723Google Scholar
  94. Xie H, Liu W, Zhang J, Zhang C, Ren L (2011) Sorption of norfloxacin from aqueous solutions by activated carbon developed from Trapa natans husk. Sci China Chem 54(5):835–843Google Scholar
  95. Xiong W, Zeng Z, Li X, Zeng G, Xiao R, Yang Z, Xu H, Chen H, Cao J, Zhou C, Qin L (2019) Ni-doped MIL-53 (Fe) nanoparticles for optimized doxycycline removal by using response surface methodology from aqueous solution. Chemosphere 232:186–194Google Scholar
  96. Xiong W, Zeng G, Yang Z, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Cheng M, Liu Y, Hu L, Wan J, Zhou C, Xu R (2018) Adsorption of tetracycline antibiotics from aqueous solutions on nanocomposite multi-walled carbon nanotube functionalized MIL-53 (Fe) as new adsorbent. Sci Total Environ 627:235–244Google Scholar
  97. Xu W, Zhang G, Zou S, Ling Z, Wang G, Yan W (2009) A preliminary investigation on the occurrence and distribution of antibiotics in the Yellow River and its tributaries, China. Water Environ Res 81(3):248–254Google Scholar
  98. Yang X, Xu G, Yu H, Zhang Z (2016) Preparation of ferric-activated sludge-based adsorbent from biological sludge for tetracycline removal. Biores Technol 211:566–573Google Scholar
  99. Zhan X, Chen J, Yang YQ, Wu SJ, Chen FR, Ying GG, Zhang CJ, Zhang LL, Zhang Q, Sun XW (2019) Removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from domestic sewage by a subsurface wastewater infiltration system with long-term operations. Environ Eng Sci 36(8):863–872Google Scholar
  100. Zhang CL, Qiao GL, Zhao F, Wang Y (2011) Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin adsorption onto modified coal fly ash from aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 163(1):53–56Google Scholar
  101. Zhang L, Wang Y, Jin S, Lu Q, Ji J (2017) Adsorption isotherm, kinetic and mechanism of expanded graphite for sulfadiazine antibiotics removal from aqueous solutions. Environ Technol 38(20):2629–2638Google Scholar
  102. Zheng Y, Huang MH, Chen L, Zheng W, Xie PK, Xu Q (2015) Comparison of tetracycline rejection in reclaimed water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes. Desalination 359:113–122Google Scholar
  103. Zhou Y, Liu X, Xiang Y, Wang P, Zhang J, Zhang F, Wei J, Luo L, Lei M, Tang L (2017) Modification of biochar derived from sawdust and its application in removal of tetracycline and copper from aqueous solution: adsorption mechanism and modelling. Biores Technol 245:266–273Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chandrashekhar Bhagat
    • 1
  • Manish Kumar
    • 2
    Email author
  • Pranab Kumar Mohapatra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of TechnologyGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Discipline of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations