Advertisement

Design, Analysis, Prototyping and Testing of Aerofoils for High-Lift at Low Reynolds Number

  • Pavan RayarEmail author
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Increased payloads, reduced aircraft noise, shortened takeoff and landing distances and lowered stall speeds can all be achieved from the direct effects of improved high-lift aerofoil aerodynamics. It is, therefore, not surprising that the high-lift aerofoil design has been and will remain a topic of interest. Along with the interest, the opportunity is to make it more cost-effective. One possible way to achieve the objective is to build a cheaper yet simpler high-lift system. This presents a challenge to the high-lift aerodynamicist: to design a less complex flap that maintains high-lift and meanwhile lowers the flow separation. Furthermore, by designing the high-lift system to achieve longer attachment of flow onto the flap, aircraft noise will be reduced. This research article presents the design, analysis and prototyping and testing of aerofoil which was carried out after performing a literature survey on the performance of many aerofoils at low Reynolds number. This research was achieved using Vortex generators for high lifts. The prototype was tested in the wind tunnel.

Keywords

Lift to drag ratio CFD Wind tunnel 

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ (1997) High-lift low Reynolds number airfoil design. J Aircr 34(1):72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Merabet A, Necib B (2003) Characterisation of wings with NACA 0012 airfoils. Rev. énergies Renouvelables 2:131–137Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kunz PJ, Kroo I (2001) Analysis and design of aerofoil’s for use at ultra low Reynolds numbers. Prog Astronaut Aeronaut 195:35–60 (Mueller TJ (ed))Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rumsey CL, Gatski TB, Ying SX, Bertelrud A (1998) Prediction of high-lift flows using turbulent closure models. AIAA J 36:765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCullough ME, Kilpatrick SD, Emmons RA, Larson DB (2004) Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychol Bull 127:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carmichael BH (1981) Low Reynolds number aerofoil survey, vol 1. NASA contractor report 165803, Nov 1981Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guilmineau E, Piquet J, Queutey P (1997) Two-dimensional turbulent viscous flow. Comput Fluids 26(2):135–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loftin LK, Poteat MI. Aerodynamic characteristics of several NACA airfoil sections at seven Reynolds numbers from 0.7 × 10 (exp 6) to 9.0 × 10(exp 6)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srivastav D (2012) Flow control over airfoils using different shaped dimples, vol 33, no. Fdtt, pp 92–97 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson JD Jr (2001) Fundamentals of aerodynamics. McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sathaye SS (2004) Lift distributions on low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers, MayGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mirzaei M, Ardekani MA, Doosttalab M (2009) Numerical and experimental study of flow field characteristics of an iced airfoil. Aerosp Sci Technol 13:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emami MR (2007) Aerodynamics forces on an aerofoil. Presented at Aerospace Undergraduate Laboratories-University of Toronto in 2007, for research on lift on aerofoil and forces acting on aerofoilGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    You D, Moin P (2008) Active control of flow separation over an airfoil using synthetic jets in 2008. J Fluids Struct 24:1349–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoerner SF (1965) Fluid dynamic drag. In: Hoerner fluid dynamics, Brick Town, NJ, pp 7.16–7.21Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gad-el-Hak M (2001) Micro-air-vehicles: can they be controlled better. J Aircr 38(3):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlichting H (1979) Aerodynamics of the airplane. Mc-Graw-Hill International Book Company, pp 143–161Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Torres G, Mueller TJ (2001) Aerodynamic characteristics of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds number. Prog Astronaut Aeronaut 195:115–141 (Mueller TJ (ed))Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pelletier A, Mueller TJ (2000) Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings. J Aircr 37(5):825–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spalart PR, Allamaras SR (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flow. AIAA Pap 92:0439Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Open∇FOAM, the Open Source CFD Toolbox user guide, version 1.4.1, 1 Aug 2007, copyright 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 OpenCFD limitedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghia U, Ghia KN, Shin CT (1982) High-Re solutions for incompressible flows using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J Comput Phys 48:387–411 (in the Langley 8-foot transonic pressure tunnel, NASA TM 81927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mangler (1939) Induced drag analysis in small aspect ratios. Yearbook D.Lufo, p.I 139Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringDwarkadas J. Sanghvi College of EngineeringMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations