Advertisement

Drilling Process Quality Improvement by Grey Relation Analysis

  • Janak Suthar
  • S. N. TeliEmail author
  • Siddesh Lad
  • Vijaya Kumar N. Kottur
Conference paper
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

It is very important to take an optimum process parameter to improve the quality of machined products with a maximum tool life and less defects. Production of hole by drilling operation is a key process in composite manufacturing because drilling operation is being performed after cure/solidification process. Poor hole quality leads to rejections up to 60% of all products manufactured. Carbon fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite have large range of application in aircraft, automotive and medical industries. This work deals with a selection of optimum process parameters in drilling of CFRP to minimize defect, thrust and torque by using grey relational analysis (GRA). After conducting the study using multi-objective GRA, gave optimum process parameters such as spindle speed—3200 rpm, feed rate—0.15 mm/rev., delamination—1.2311, torque—1.483331 N-m and thrust—7.897 N.

Keywords

CFRP GRA Torque Thrust 

References

  1. 1.
    Adsit NR (1983) In: Compression Testing of homogeneous materials and composites, symposium. ASTM Special Technical Publication, pp 175–186 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suthar J, Teli SN, Lad S (2017) Review of machining on composite and connected optimisation techniques. Int J Sci Eng Res 8(3):259–261Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garnier C, Pastor ML, Eyma F, Lorrain B (2011) The detection of aeronautical defects in situ on composite structures using non destructive testing. Compos Struct 93:1328–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abrate S, Walton DA (1992) Machining of composite materials. Part I: traditional methods. Compos. Manuf. 3:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin SC, Chen IK (1996) Drilling carbon fiber-reinforced composite material at high speed. Wear 194:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turki Y, Habak M, Velasco R, Laurent JN, Vantomme P (2013) An experimental study of drilling parameters effect on composite carbon/epoxy damage. Key Eng Mater 554–557:2038–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh D, Venkateswara Rao P (2007) Optimization of tool geometry and cutting parameters for hard turning. Mater Manuf Process 22:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panchagnula KK, Palaniyandi K (2018) Drilling on fiber reinforced polymer/nanopolymer composite laminates: a review. J Mater Res Technol 7:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davim JP, Reis P, António CC (2004) Experimental study of drilling glass fiber reinforced plastics (GFRP) manufactured by hand lay-up. Compos Sci Technol 64:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsao CC, Hocheng H (2003) The effect of chisel length and associated pilot hole on delamination when drilling composite materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhatnagar N, Ramakrishnan N, Naik NK, Komanduri R (1995) On the machining of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) composite laminates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:701–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rahman M, Ramakrishna S, Prakash JRS, Tan DCG (1999) Machinability study of carbon fiber reinforced composite. J Mater Process Technol 89–90:292–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piquet R, Ferret B, Lachaud F, Swider P (2000) Experimental analysis of drilling damage in thin carbon/epoxy plate using special drills. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 31:1107–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davim JP (2009) Book Review: machining of polymer composites by Jamal Y Sheikh-Ahmad. Int J Mach Mach Mater 6:322Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faraz A, Biermann D, Weinert K (2009) Cutting edge rounding: An innovative tool wear criterion in drilling CFRP composite laminates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:1185–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shyha IS, Aspinwall DK, Soo SL, Bradley S (2009) Drill geometry and operating effects when cutting small diameter holes in CFRP. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:1008–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lazar MB, Xirouchakis P (2011) Experimental analysis of drilling fiber reinforced composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krishnamoorthy A, Rajendra Boopathy S, Palanikumar K, Paulo Davim J (2012) Application of grey fuzzy logic for the optimization of drilling parameters for CFRP composites with multiple performance characteristics. Meas J Int Meas Confed 45:1286–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Rubio JC, Correia AE, Abrão AM, Davim JP (2008) Analysis of parametric influence on delamination in high-speed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastic composites. J Mater Process Technol 203:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suthar J, Teli SN, Lad S (2018) Application of response surface methodology in drilling of carbon fiber application of response surface methodology in drilling of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite (CFRP). Int J Sci Eng Res 9:347–350Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhowmik S, Jagadis KG (2019) Modeling and optimization of advanced manufacturing processes. Springer International Publishing, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhushi U, Suthar J., Teli SN (2020) Performance analysis of metaheuristics optimization techniques for drilling process on CFRP composites. Mat Today ProcGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Öktem H, Erzurumlu T, Kurtaran H (2005) Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness. J Mater Process Technol 170:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palanisamy P, Rajendran I, Shanmugasundaram S (2007) Optimization of machining parameters using genetic algorithm and experimental validation for end-milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:644–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Callister WD Jr (2000) Materials science and engineering—an introduction, 5th edn. In: Anti-corrosion methods, materials, vol 47Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kyratsis P, Markopoulos AP, Efkolidis N, Maliagkas V, Kakoulis K (2018) Prediction of thrust force and cutting torque in drilling based on the response surface methodology. Machines 6:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arul S, Vijayaraghavan L, Malhotra SK, Krishnamurthy R (2006) The effect of vibratory drilling on hole quality in polymeric composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:252–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haq AN, Kannan G (2006) An integrated approach for selecting a vendor using grey relational analysis. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 5:277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janak Suthar
    • 1
  • S. N. Teli
    • 2
    Email author
  • Siddesh Lad
    • 3
  • Vijaya Kumar N. Kottur
    • 4
  1. 1.Vishwatmak Om Gurudev College of EngineeringThaneIndia
  2. 2.Bharati Vidyapeeth College of EngineeringNavi MumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Saraswati College of EngineeringNavi MumbaiIndia
  4. 4.D. J. Sanghvi College of EngineeringMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations