Advertisement

Inherent Mapping Analysis of Agile Development Methodology Through Design Thinking

  • Archana MagareEmail author
  • Madonna Lamin
  • Prasun Chakrabarti
Conference paper
  • 26 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 52)

Abstract

Software engineering is a systematic set of activities which leads to the development of software solutions of the user’s requirement. In today’s information era, there is a need to fulfill the user’s requirements quickly in a swift and systematic manner, which is done through agile development methodology. Design thinking facilitates the software development team not only to identify the explicit requirements but also the implicit requirements very keenly. This paper introduces the new framework—Intelli-A, which inherently maps the design thinking approach in agile methodology.

Keywords

Agile development Design thinking Software development Story boarding Intelli-A 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbas N, Gravell AM, Wills GB (2008) Historical roots of agile methods: where did “Agile thinking” come from?. In: International conference on agile processes and extreme programming in software engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 94–103Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buzan T, Griffiths C (2013) Mind maps for business. In: Using the ultimate thinking tool to revolutionise how you work, 2nd edn. Pearson, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bella M, Hanington B (2012) Universal methods of design. Rockport Publishers, Beverly, p 204Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roman P (2013) The product canvas—a lean tool for creating new products. Cambridge Product Management NetworkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin KS (2012) Essential scrum: a practical guide to the most popular agile process. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beck K (1999) Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer 32(10):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Highsmith J, Cockburn A (2001) Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer 34(9):120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ambler S (2002) Agile modeling: effective practices for extreme programming and the unified process. WileyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magare A, Lamin M (2017) Cognitive evolution in software development life cycle through design thinking. Comput Model New Technol 21(3):31–34Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sohaib O, Solanki H, Dhaliwa N, Hussain W, Asif M (2019) Integrating design thinking into extreme programming. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 10(6):2485–2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pereira JC, de FSM Russo R (2018) Design thinking integrated in agile software development: a systematic literature review. Procedia Comput Sci 138:775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dobrigkeit F, de Paula D (2019) Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM joint meeting on European software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering, pp 1059–1069Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    dos Santos Braz R, Merlin JR, Trindade DFG, Ribeiro CE, Sgarbi EM, de Sordi Jr F (2019) Design thinking and scrum in software requirements elicitation: a case study. In: International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Cham, pp 179–194Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown T, Wyatt J (2010) Design thinking for social innovation. Dev Outreach 12(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hendricks S, Conrad N, Douglas TS, Mutsvangwa T (2018) A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation. In: Healthcare, vol 6(3). Elsevier, pp 191–196Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cárdenas LFS, Ibarra ERB, Díaz-Piraquive FN, Rojas IR, González-Crespo R, Calvo A (2018) Design thinking application methodology for pediatric service innovation. In: International conference on knowledge management in organizations. Springer, Cham, pp 215–222Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kinnunen S (2018) The inferences between design thinking and innovation managementGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woudhuysen J (2011) The craze for design thinking: roots, a critique, and toward an alternative. Des Principles Practices 5(6):235–248Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson MS, Cheville RA (2018) Navigating process-product tensions using a design canvas. In: ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedingsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Archana Magare
    • 1
    Email author
  • Madonna Lamin
    • 1
  • Prasun Chakrabarti
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Assistant Professor, Dept. of Computer Science and EngineeringITM(SLS) Baroda UniversityVadodaraIndia
  2. 2.Executive Dean (Research and International Linkage) and Institute Distinguished Senior Chair ProfessorTechno India NJR Institute of TechnologyUdaipurIndia
  3. 3.Adjunct Distinguished ProfessorITM(SLS) Baroda UniversityVadodaraIndia

Personalised recommendations