Advertisement

Assessing Career Life Skills Self-efficacy of Students with Special Educational Needs: A Comparative Study in Hong Kong

  • Lan YangEmail author
  • Mantak Yuen
  • Hui Wang
  • Zhuoying Wang
  • Kuen Fung Sin
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the Advancing Inclusive and Special Education in the Asia-Pacific book series (AISEAP)

Abstract

The psychological construct of self-efficacy plays a salient role in students’ pursuit of a career path. Career-related self-efficacy is strongly associated with life satisfaction and emotional well-being. Most of what is known about this construct has come from research with mainstream students in the West, and considerably less attention has focused on students with special educational needs. The limited knowledge we have of SEN students’ career-related self-efficacy may be due to lack of appropriate assessment instruments with sound psychometric properties that can be used across cultures. This chapter reports steps taken to validate such an instrument, the Career Development Self-Efficacy Inventory (CD-SEI), for assessing career life skills self-efficacy in SEN students. The authors describe the use of a short form of CD-SEI in Hong Kong with a sample of SEN students and a comparison group without special needs. Theoretical and practical implications of using this instrument to assess career life skills self-efficacy of SEN students are discussed in light of current career development theories.

Keywords

Career development Inclusive education Measurement scales Students with special educational needs 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Preparation of this chapter was partially supported by Early Career Scheme funded by University Grant Council, Hong Kong SAR to Dr. Yang Lan, The Education University of Hong Kong (Project number: 28611618).

References

  1. Arbona C (2005) Promoting the career development and academic achievement of at-risk youth: college access programs. In: Brown SD, Lent RW (eds) Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 525–550Google Scholar
  2. Audit Commission (2018) Audit Commission, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Chapter three of Report No. 70 of the Director of Audit. Retrieved from https://www.aud.gov.hk/pdf_e/e70ch03.pdf
  3. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura A (1986) Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. Am Psychol 41(12):1389–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura A (1989) Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Dev Psychol 25(5):729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett P (2007) Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Pers Individ Differ 42(5):815–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Betz NE, Hackett G (1986) Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior. J Soc Clin Psychol 4(3):279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betz NE, Hackett G (2006) Career self-efficacy theory: back to the future. J Career Assess 14(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgen FH, Betz NE (2008) Career self-efficacy and personality: linking career confidence and healthy personality. J Career Assess 16(1):22–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Britner SL, Pajares F (2006) Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. J Res Sci Teach: Off J Natl Assoc Res Sci Teach 43(5):485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown SD (2015) On statistical wizardry, construct proliferation, and other challenges for our science. Couns Psychol 43(4):614–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ, Muthén B (1989) Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychol Bull 105:456–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 14:464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 9:233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi Y, Kim J, Kim S (2015) Career development and school success in adolescents: the role of career interventions. Career Dev Q 63(2):171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cobb RB, Alwell M (2009) Transition planning/coordinating interventions for youth with disabilities: a systematic review. Career Dev Except Individ 32(2):70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummings R, Maddux CD, Casey J (2000) Individualized transition planning for students with learning disabilities. Career Dev Q 49(1):60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Fabio A, Kenny ME (2011) Promoting emotional intelligence and career decision making among Italian high school students. J Career Assess 19(1):21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enders C (2010) Applied missing data analysis. Guilford, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Glessner K, Rockinson-Szapkiw AJ, Lopez ML (2017) “Yes, I Can”: testing an intervention to increase middle school students’ college and career self-efficacy. Career Dev Q 65(4):315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomez C (2015) Prepare students with hearing impairments for world of work. Disabil Compliance High Educ 20(6):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gysbers NC, Henderson P (2000) Developing and managing your school counseling program, 3rd edn. Am Couns Assoc, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. Hackett G, Betz NE (1981) A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. J Vocat Behav 18(3):326–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hackett G, Betz NE (1995) Self-efficacy and career choice and development. Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 249–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hampton NZ, Mason E (2003) Learning disabilities, gender, sources of efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students. J Sch Psychol 41(2):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Müllen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6(1):53–60Google Scholar
  27. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hua CB (2002) Career self-efficacy of the student who is gifted/learning disabled: a case study. J Educ Gift 25(4):375–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langley A (2000) Emotional intelligence—a new evaluation for management development? Career Dev Int 5(3):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lapan RT, Turner SL (1997) Mapping vocational challenges (computer software)Google Scholar
  31. Lapan RT, Gysbers NC, Multon KD, Pike GR (1997) Developing guidance competency self-efficacy scales for high school and middle school students. Meas Eval Couns Dev 30(1):4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lent RW (2005) A social cognitive view of career development and counseling. In: Brown SD, Lent RW (eds) Career development and counseling: putting theory and research to work. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 101–130Google Scholar
  33. Lent RW, Hackett G (1987) Career self-efficacy: empirical status and future directions. J Vocat Behav 30(3):347–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lent RW, Brown SD, Larkin KC (1986) Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. J Couns Psychol 33(3):265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G (1996) Career development from a social cognitive perspective. In: Brown D, Brooks L et al (eds) Career choice and development, 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 373–421Google Scholar
  36. Lent RW, Ireland GW, Penn LT, Morris TR, Sappington R (2017) Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: a test of the social cognitive model of career self-management. J Vocat Behav 99:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luzzo DA, Hitchings WE, Retish P, Shoemaker A (1999) Evaluating differences in college students’ career decision making on the basis of disability status. Career Dev Q 48(2):142–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Grayson D (2005) Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In: Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle J (eds) Contemporary psychometrics: a festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 275–340Google Scholar
  39. Maurer TJ (2001) Career-relevant learning and development, worker age, and beliefs about self-efficacy for development. J Manag 27(2):123–140Google Scholar
  40. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2017) Mplus user’s guide, 8th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  41. Nagy G, Köller O, Heckhausen J (2005) The transition from school to vocational education: avoiding worry does not pay. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 37:156–167Google Scholar
  42. Niles SG, Harris-Bowlsbey J (2005) Career development interventions in the 21st century. Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Brien KM, Dukstein RD, Jackson SL, Tomlinson MJ, Kamatuka NA (1999) Broadening career horizons for students in at-risk environments. Career Dev Q 47(3):215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osipow SH (1987) Manual for the career decision scale. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FLGoogle Scholar
  45. Panagos RJ, DuBois DL (1999) Career self-efficacy development and students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract 14(1):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patton W, McMahon M (2014) Career development and systems theory: connecting theory and practice, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, GermanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rojewski JW (2005) Occupational aspirations: constructs, meanings, and application. In: Brown SD, Lent RW (eds) Career development and counseling: putting theory and research to work. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 131–154Google Scholar
  48. Rojewski JW, Lee IH, Gregg N, Gemici S (2012) Development patterns of occupational aspirations in adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Except Child 78:157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res 8(2):23–74Google Scholar
  50. Sin KF, Yang L (2018) Post-school transition of students with special educational needs in Hong Kong. In: Pavlova M, Lee JK, Maclean R (eds) Transitions to post-school life. Springer, Singapore, pp 183–195Google Scholar
  51. Steenkamp JEM, Baumgartner H (1998) Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J Consum Res 25:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steger MF (2006) An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. J Pers Assess 86(3):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Talapatra D, Roach AT, Varjas K, Houchins DE, Crimmins DB (2019) Transition services for students with intellectual disabilities: school psychologists’ perceptions. Psychol Sch 56(1):56–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor KM, Betz NE (1983) Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. J Vocat Behav 22(1):63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turner S, Lapan RT (2002) Career self-efficacy and perceptions of parent support in adolescent career development. Career Dev Q 51(1):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (1994) The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/000984/098427eo.pdf
  57. Vasalampi K, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi J-E (2009) Adolescents’ self-concordance, school engagement, and burnout predict their educational trajectories. Eur Psychol 14:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Westwood P (2009) What teachers need to know about students with disabilities. Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  59. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (date if possible) Report No. 70 of the Direct of Audit. Retrieved from https://www.aud.gov.hk/pdf_e/e70ch03.pdf
  60. Yang L, Sin KF, Cheng SY, Gao FZ (2015) Developing a short form of career development self-efficacy inventory (SF-CD-SEI) for students with special educational needs. Hong Kong J Spec Educ 17:28–39Google Scholar
  61. Yuen M, Gysbers NC, Chan RM, Lau PS, Leung TK, Hui EK, Shea PM (2005) Developing a career development self-efficacy instrument for Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Int J Educ Vocat Guid 5(1):57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lan Yang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mantak Yuen
    • 2
  • Hui Wang
    • 3
  • Zhuoying Wang
    • 4
  • Kuen Fung Sin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  2. 2.The University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  3. 3.Department of Special Education and CounsellingThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  4. 4.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations