Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Sarah Moulds
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter concludes by reflecting on the central theme of this book, and argues that understanding parliamentary committees working together as a system provides the most fertile opportunity to identify options to improve Australia’s parliamentary model of rights protection. It also explains that the findings made in Part II and the recommendations made in Part III are of particular relevance to rights advocates because they provide a persuasive counterpoint to those who have expressed scepticism about the capacity of the parliamentary committee system to deliver meaningful rights protection. In this way, this chapter brings a new perspective to the broader discussion on how rights should be protected in Australia, whilst reflecting on the particular contribution these committees of influence have made to the content and contours of counter-terrorism laws in Australia.

References

Books/Articles/ Reports/Speeches

  1. Appleby, G. (2015). The 2014 counter-terrorism reforms in review. Public Law Review, 26(1), 4–7.Google Scholar
  2. Byrnes, A. (2014). Human rights under the microscope: Reflections on parliamentary scrutiny. Speech delivered at Law Society of South Australia Continuing Professional Development Program, Adelaide, 11 December 2014. http://www.ahrcentre.org/sites/ahrcentre.org/files/mdocs/Byrnes%20%2D%2D%20%20PJCHR%20-%20handout%20for%20Adelaide%20talk%20December%202014%20revised.pdf
  3. Byrnes, A. (2020). Economic and social rights in the Australian parliamentary human rights scrutiny process. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 135–171). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, T. (2006). Human rights strategies: An Australian alternative. In T. Campbell, J. Goldsworthy, & A. Stone (Eds.), Protecting rights without a bill of rights (pp. 319–334). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, T., & Morris, S. (2015). Human rights for democracies: A provisional assessment of the Australian human rights (Parliamentary scrutiny) act 2011. University of Queensland Law Journal, 34(1), 7–27.Google Scholar
  6. Carne, G. (2015). Re-orientating human rights meanings and understandings? Reviving and revisiting Australian human rights exceptionalism through a Liberal democratic rights agenda. Flinders Law Review Journal, 17, 1–67. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/FlinLawJl/2015/1.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Charlesworth, H. (2002). Writing in rights: Australia and the protection of human rights. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dalla-Pozza, D. (2016). Refining the Australian counter-terrorism legislative framework: How deliberative has parliament been? Public Law Review, 27(4), 271.Google Scholar
  9. Dalla-Pozza, D. (2020). A dual scrutiny mechanism for Australia’s counter- terrorism law landscape: The INSLM and the PJCIS. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 673–700). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  10. Debeljak, J., & Grenfell, L. (2020a). Contextualising law making and human rights. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 2–28). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  11. Debeljak, J., & Grenfell, L. (2020b). Future directions for engaging with human rights in law- making: Is a culture of justification emerging across Australian jurisdictions? In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 789–818). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, C. & Evans, S. (2006a). Australian parliaments and the protection of human rights. Paper presented in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series, Canberra, 8 December 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, C., & Evans, S. (2006b). Evaluating the human rights performance of legislatures. Human Rights Law Review, 6, 545–569.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngl012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, C., & Evans, S. (2006c). Legislative scrutiny committees and parliamentary conceptions of human rights. Public Law, 785.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, C. & Evans, S. (2007), Australian Parliaments and the protection of human rights, Parl Paper No 47. Canberra: Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/~/~/link.aspx?_id=8B6C280930C4453C92CA146B82B01CE6&_z=z
  16. Fletcher, A. (2018). Australia’s human rights scrutiny regime. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fletcher, A. (2020). Human rights scrutiny in the Federal Parliament: Smokescreen or democratic solution? In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law- making and human rights (pp. 31–63). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  18. Foot, R. (2007). The United Nations, counter terrorism and human rights: Institutional adaptation and embedded ideas. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 489–514.  https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halligan, J. (2008). Parliamentary committee roles in facilitating public policy at the commonwealth level. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 23(2), 135–156.Google Scholar
  20. Hiebert, J. L. (2015). Legislative rights review: Addressing the gap between ideals and constraints. In Hunt, M. Hooper, H. J & Yowell, P. (Eds.), Parliaments and human rights: Redressing the democratic deficit (pp. 39–52). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Hunt, M., Hooper, H. J., & Yowell, P. (Eds.). (2015). Parliaments and human rights: Redressing the democratic deficit. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Kinley, D. (1999). Parliamentary scrutiny of human rights: A duty neglected. In P. Alston (Ed.), Promoting human rights through bills of rights: Comparative perspectives (pp. 158–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kinley, D., & Ernst, C. (2012). Exile on main street: Australia’s legislative agenda for human rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 58–70.Google Scholar
  24. Levy, R. & Orr, G. (2016) The law of deliberative democracy. London: Routledge. pp. 4, 22-23.Google Scholar
  25. Lynch, A., & McGarrity, N. (2008). Counter-terrorism laws: How neutral laws create fear and anxiety in Australia’s Muslim communities. Alternative Law Journal, 33(4), 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsh, I. (2004, November 26). Australia’s representation gap: A role for parliamentary committees? Speech delivered at the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series, Parliament House, Canberra.Google Scholar
  27. Monk, D. (2010). A framework for evaluating the performance of committees in Westminster parliaments. Journal of Legislative Studies, 16, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903541904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moulds, S. P. (2019). Parliamentary rights scrutiny and counter-terrorism lawmaking in Australia. Journal of South East Asian Human Rights, 3(2), 185–230.  https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v3i2.13461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moulds, S. P. (2020). Parliamentary committees facilitating parliamentary deliberation: A case study of marriage equality reform. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 745–786). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  30. Rajanayagam, S. (2020). Urgent Law-Making and the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law-making and human rights (pp. 647–672). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, D., & Williams, G. (2017). A charter of rights for Australia (4th ed.). Sydney: NewSouth Books.Google Scholar
  32. Reynolds, D., & Williams, G. (2020). Evaluating the impact of Australia’s federal human rights scrutiny regime. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 67–96). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  33. Rice, S. (2020). Allowing for dissent: Opening up human rights dialogue in the Australian parliament. In J. Debeljak & L. Grenfell (Eds.), Law making and human rights (pp. 99–134). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
  34. Roach, K. (Ed.). (2015). Comparative counter-terrorism law (pp. 650–688). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stephenson, S. (2016). From dialogue to disagreement in comparative rights constitutionalism. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  36. Uhr, J. (1998). Deliberative democracy in Australia: The changing place of parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, G. (2011). A decade of Australian anti-terror laws. Melbourne University Law Review, 35(3), 1136. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/2011/38.html.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, G. (2012). Anti-terror legislation in Australia and New Zealand. In V. Ramraj, M. Hor, K. Roach, & G. Williams (Eds.), Global anti-terrorism law and policy (p. 541). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, G. (2015). The legal assault on Australian democracy: The annual Blackburn lecture. Ethos, 236, 18–23.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, G. (2016). Scrutiny of primary legislation principles and challenges: Where are we now and where are we headed? Speech delivered at the Australia-New Zealand Scrutiny of Legislation Conference, Parliament House, Perth, 12 July 2016. http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/WebCMS/WebCMS.nsf/resources/file-anzslc-provisional-conference-program/$file/ANZSLC%20Provisional%20Conference%20Program%20V5.pdf
  41. Williams, G., & Burton, L. (2015). Australia’s parliamentary scrutiny act: An exclusive parliamentary model of rights protection. In M. Hunt, H. J. Hooper, & P. Yowell (Eds.), Parliaments and human rights: Redressing the democratic deficit (pp. 258–279). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, G., & Reynolds, D. (2016). The operation and impact of Australia’s parliamentary scrutiny regime for human rights. Monash University Law Review, 41(2), 469–508.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, G., Davis, F., & McGarrity, N. (Eds.). (2014). Surveillance, counter-terrorism and comparative constitutionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Zifcak, S. (2015). Counter-terrorism and human rights. In J. Menadue & M. Keating (Eds.), Fairness, opportunity and security. Adelaide: ATF Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Moulds
    • 1
  1. 1.Justice and SocietyUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations