Border Community and Border Management: A Case of Tawang Tract

  • Pushpita DasEmail author


Security and management of the international border are increasingly being viewed as a shared responsibility between the union government and the local community. However, given that the border areas are at the periphery of a state and often remote, the local people are, more often than not, subjected to powerful centrifugal forces. The situation is compounded further if the border areas are underdeveloped and the quality of life is poor. Tawang is of immense importance for India because of its strategic location as well as Chinese claims on it. Even though Tawang was administered by the Tibetans for centuries and Indian administration was established only in 1951, the Monpas has steadfastly remained loyal to India. The Indian government has also tried to instil a sense of loyalty among them through various training programmes. But in recent years, a sense of neglect is creeping among the local people given the pervasive underdevelopment in their area. They have started demanding separate autonomous district council to preserve their identity. Indian government needs to be mindful of this sense of neglect among local people and redouble its efforts to win back their trust by sustained developmental work and building a healthy relationship with the local people.


Border management Border community India–China border Tawang 


  1. Barooah Pisharoty, Sangeeta. 2017. When It Comes to Renaming Places in Tawang, China Is Not Alone, The Wire, Tawang, May 23, 2017, viewed July 19, 2018,
  2. Dutta, Sujit. 2008. Revisiting China’s Territorial Claims on Arunachal. Strategic Analysis 32 (4): 557.Google Scholar
  3. Guyot-Réchard, Bérénice. 2017. Shadow States: India, China and the Himalayas 1910–1962. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ishar, Brig J.S. 2018. History of Project Vartak, viewed July at 18, 2018,
  5. Marshall, Julie G. 2005. Britain and Tibet: 1765–1947, 462. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  6. Mullik, B.N. 1971. My Years with Nehru: The Chinese Betrayal, 491. Bombay: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Noorani, A.G. 2011. India-China Boundary Problem 1846–1947. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pillai Rajagopalan, Rajeswari, and Rahul Prakash. 2013. Sino-Indian Border Infrastructure: An Update. ORF Occasional Paper No. 42, New Delhi, May 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Pradhan, R.D. 2008. Dragons’s Shadow Over Arunachal: A Challenge to India’s Polity, 32–33. New Delhi: Rupa.Google Scholar
  10. Rose, Leo E. 1967. The North-Est Frontier Agency of India, 5. Berkeley: Institute of International Study.Google Scholar
  11. Shukla, Sonia. 2012. Forging New Frontiers: Integrating Tawang with India, 1951. China Report 48 (4): 413–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shukla, Ajai, and Sonia Trikha Shukla. 2012. The 1962 War: How China Lost the Battle for Hearts,, October 30, 2012, viewed July 18, 2018,
  13. Sibal, Kanwal. 2017. India Need Not Worry About China’s Bluster on Tawang and the Dalai Lama. The Wire, April 9, 2017, viewed July 16, 2018.
  14. Sinha, P.B., and A.A. Athale. 1992. History of the Conflict with China, 1962, 161–163. New Delhi: Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Defence Studies and AnalysisNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations