Advertisement

Measuring and Building Community Disaster Resilience: Essential for Achieving Sendai

  • Adriana KeatingEmail author
Chapter
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the Disaster and Risk Research: GADRI Book Series book series (DRRGBS)

Abstract

Disaster risk and resulting impacts are on the rise, threatening development gains. The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction seeks to tackle the underlying drivers of risk, namely increasing exposure, and promote well-being. Achieving the goals of Sendai requires a shift in practice, away from the status quo in DRM and toward a holistic and system-thinking approach to disaster resilience that is centered on development. This chapter outlines one such approach, that of the Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance, to measure and build community flood resilience in 118 communities across nine countries. The links between the Flood Resilience Measurement for Communities (FRMC) measurement tool and linked resilience-building interventions and the goals of the Sendai Framework are outlined to demonstrate the potential of resilience for tackling the underlying drivers of increasing disaster risk.

Keywords

Resilience Measurement Systems analysis Development 

References

  1. Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J (2005) Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander DE (2013) Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journal. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2707–2716.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2013) Investing in resilience: Ensuring a disaster-resistant future. Asian Development Bank, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson, C. and Twigg, J. (2004) Measuring Mitigation: Methodologies for assessing natural hazard risks and the net benefits of mitigation. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), ProVention ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  5. Bubeck P, Botzen W, Kreibich H, Aerts J (2012) Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: An analysis for the German part of the river Rhine. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12:3507–3518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bull-Kamanga L, Diagne K, Lavell A, Leon E, Lerise F, MacGregor H, Maskrey A, Meshack M, Pelling M, Reid H, Satterthwaite D, Songsore J, Westgate K, Yitambe A (2003) From Everyday Hazards to Disasters: The accumulation of risk in urban areas. Environment and Urbanization 15(1):193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell K, Laurien F, Czajkowski J, Keating A, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Mon-togomery M (2018) A large scale community flood resilience analysis: first in-sights from the flood resilience measurement tool. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101257
  8. Cardona O (2003) The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, development and people. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. CRED (2015) The Human Cost of Weather Related Disasters 1995–2015. Available via CRED. https://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/HCWRD_2015.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2018
  10. CRED (2018) Economic Losses, Poverty and Disasters 1998–2017. Available via CRED. https://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/CRED_Economic_Losses_10oct.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2018
  11. Cutter, S. (2016) “The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA” Natural Hazards 80(2): 741–758 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069–015-1993-2
  12. Cutter S, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DFID (1999) Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets, Department of International Development, United Kingdom, http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0901/section2.pdf
  14. DFID (2011) Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper, Department of International Development, United Kingdom, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/186874/defining-disaster-resilience-approach-paper.pdf
  15. Djalante R, Holley C, Thomalla F (2011) Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 2:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ESCAP (2013) Building Resilience to Natural Disasters and Major Economic Crises, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/ThemeStudy2013-full2.pdf
  17. Fernandez, R. and Sanahuj, H. (2012) Linkages Between Population Dynamics, Urbanization Processes and Disaster Risk: A regional vision of Latin America. Panama City: UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Regional Office for the Americas (UNISDR-AM), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), UNHABITATGoogle Scholar
  18. Gostelow, L., Desplats, G., Shoham, J., Dolan, C., and Hailey, P. (2016) “Nutrition and Resilience: A Scoping Study.” 1. Emergency Nutrition Network (ENN). https://www.ennonline.net/attachments/2450/Resilience-report-final.pdf
  19. Hallegatte, S. (2011) “How Economic Growth and Rational Decisions Can Make Disaster Losses Grow Faster than Wealth.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.5617.  https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5617
  20. Hoff H, Bouwer L, Berz G, Kron W, Loster T (2003) Risk Management in Water and Climate—the Role of Insurance and Other Financial Services. Munich Reinsurance Company, MunichGoogle Scholar
  21. Holling, C. S., (1996) “Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience” Engineering within Ecological Constraints 31:32Google Scholar
  22. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IFRC (2012) Understanding community resilience and program factors that strengthen them: A comprehensive study of Red Cross Red Crescent Societies tsunami operation, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, June 2012, https://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/96984/Final_Synthesis_Characteristics_Lessons_Tsunami.pdf
  24. IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [C.B. Field; V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor and P.M. Midgley (eds)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Keating A, Campbell K, Mechler R, Magnuszewski P, Mochizuki J, Liu W, Szoenyi M, McQuistan C (2016) Disaster resilience: What it is and how it can engender a meaningful change in development policy. Development Policy Review 35(1):65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keating A, Campbell K, Szoenyi M, Mcquistan C, Nash D, Burer M (2017) Development and Testing of a Community Flood Resilience Measurement Tool. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 17(1):77–101.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-77-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellett, J. and Caravani, A. (2013) Financing disaster risk reduction: A 20-year story of international aid, ODI and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery at the World Bank, London/ WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Kreibich H, Thieken A (2007) ‘Coping with floods in the city of Dresden. Germany’, Natural Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9200-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kundzewicz Z, Kanae S, Seneviratne S, Handmer J, Nicholls N, Peduzzi P, Mechler R, Bouwer L, Arnell N, Mach K, Muir-Wood R, Brakenridge G, Kron W, Benito G, Honda Y, Takahashi K, Sherstyukov B (2014) Flood risk and climate change—global and regional perspectives. Hydrol Sci J.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kunreuther H, Meyer R, Michel-Kerjan E (2013) Overcoming Decision Biases to Reduce Losses from Natural Catastrophes. In: Shafr E (ed) Behavioral Foundations of Policy. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  31. Laurien, F Keating A (2019) Evidence from measuring community flood resilience in Asia. ADB economics working paper series, No. 595. Asian Development Bank, Manila. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/WPS190484-2
  32. Laurien F, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Keating A, Campbell K, Mechler R, Czajkowski J (2020) A typology of community flood resilience. Reg Environ Change 20:24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10113-020-01593-x
  33. Lavell A, Maskrey A (2014) The Future of Disaster Risk Management. Environ Hazards 13(4):267–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mechler R (2016) ‘Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost–benefit analysis’, Natural Hazards. pp. 1-27Google Scholar
  35. Meerow S, Newell JP (2015) Resilience and Complexity: a Bibliometric Review and Prospects for Industrial Ecology. J Ind Ecol 19(2):236–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Research Council (NRC) (2012) Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Oddsdottir F, Lucas B, Combaz É (2013) Measuring Disaster Resilience, GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1045. University of Birmingham, UK, GSDRCGoogle Scholar
  38. Ostadtaghizadeh A, Ardalan A, Paton D, Jabbari H, Khankeh HR (2015) Community disaster resilience: a systematic review on assessment models and tools. PLOS Currents Disasters.  https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210edCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pasteur K (2011) From Vulnerability to Resilience. Practical Action Publishing, RugbyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schipper ELF, Langston L (2015) A Comparative Overview of Resilience Measurement Frameworks: Analysing Indicators and Approaches. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper, Issue 422Google Scholar
  41. Sharifi A (2016) A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators 69: 629–647 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X16302588
  42. Twigg J (2009) Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community, http://community.eldis.org/.59e907ee/Characteristics2EDITION.pdf
  43. UN (2005) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, 22 January 2005, A/CONF.206/6. United Nations. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/42b98a704.html
  44. UN (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. New York, NY: United NationsGoogle Scholar
  45. UNISDR (2011) Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  46. UNISDR (2013) From Shared Risk to Shared Value: The business case for disaster risk reduction. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  47. UNISDR (2015) Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Making development sustainable: the future of disaster risk management. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk ReductionGoogle Scholar
  48. van Aalst M, Kellett J, Pichon F, Mitchell T (2013) Incentives in Disaster Risk Management and Humanitarian Response. Background note for World Development Report May 2014, at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTNWDR2013/Resources/8258024-1352909193861/8936935-1356011448215/8986901-1380568255405/WDR14_bn_Incentives_in_disaster_risk_management_vanAalst.pdf
  49. Welsh M (2013) Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winderl T (2014) Disaster Resilience Measurements: Stocktaking of ongoing efforts in developing systems for measuring resilience. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations