Advertisement

Flipped Instruction Among Medical Students in Singapore

  • Noi Keng KohEmail author
  • Barry J. Fraser
  • Wai-Han Hoi
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Springer Texts in Education book series (SPTE)

Abstract

The work described in this chapter was carried out in a teaching hospital and was led by a team of senior medical doctors/instructors. Self-regulated learning was fostered among a group of 168 medical students through the use of a mobile learning application together with flipped instruction, as part of a larger project on a multi-modal, seamless learning environment. The effectiveness of this instruction was evaluated using a questionnaire assessing perceived Personal Relevance, Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy, together with focus-group interviews. Comparison of flipped with conventional instruction or pretest with posttest scores revealed statistically-significant differences for each scale with effect sizes that were small for Personal Relevance, medium for Satisfaction and large for Self-Efficacy. Focus groups suggested that while the convenience of learning-on-the-go is appreciated for its convenience and flexibility in terms of learning anytime and anywhere, it is still not unanimously embraced because of reasons like the traditional mode of having protected time for learning and face-to-face instant clarifications.

Keywords

Learning environment Technology Mobile applications Healthcare education Flipped instruction Medical practitioners 

References

  1. Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131–150.Google Scholar
  2. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Chen, C. C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a crossnational study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37–55.Google Scholar
  3. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Sebela, M. P. (2004). Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environments in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 24(4), 245–253.Google Scholar
  4. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Boston: Allyn & Bacon Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action approach. Reading, MA: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge Series on Theory and Practice of Adult Education in North America. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Brookfield, S. (1995). Adult learning: An overview. International Encyclopedia of Education, 10, 375–380.Google Scholar
  8. Boston, W. E., Ice, P., Díaz, S. R., Richardson, J., Gibson, A. M., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  9. Boston, W. E., Ice, P., & Gibson, A. M. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of student retention in online learning environments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from https://www.learntechib.org/p/526271.
  10. Chen, F., Lui, A. M., & Martinelli, S. M. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical Education, 51(6), 585–597.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta‐analysis. Medical education, 52(9), 910–924.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Cohn, S. T., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Effectiveness of student response systems in terms of learning environment, attitudes and achievement. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 153–167.Google Scholar
  14. Crews, T., & Butterfield, J. B. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38.Google Scholar
  15. Essex, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from “distressed” students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233–239.Google Scholar
  16. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Fraser, B. (2014). Classroom learning environments: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education Volume II (pp. 104–119). USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
  19. Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., Takaro, T. K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 181.Google Scholar
  20. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33.Google Scholar
  21. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of Distance Education, 1, 113–127.Google Scholar
  22. Hammond, M., & Collins, R. (1991). Self-directed learning: Critical practice. East Brunswick, NJ: Nichols/GP Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Hasan, A., & Fraser, B. J. (2015). Effectiveness of teaching strategies for engaging adults who experienced childhood difficulties in learning mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 18(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  24. Helding, K. A., & Fraser, B. J. (2013). Effectiveness of National Board Certified (NBC) teachers in terms of classroom environment, attitudes and achievement among secondary science students. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  25. Hennink, M. M. (2007). International focus group research: A handbook for the health and social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38.Google Scholar
  27. Hills, H. (2017). Individual preferences in e-learning. Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Houston, L. S., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2008). An evaluation of elementary school science kits in terms of classroom environment and student attitudes. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(4), 29–47.Google Scholar
  29. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.Google Scholar
  30. Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.Google Scholar
  31. Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Kim, K. J. (2009). Motivational challenges of adult learners in self-directed e-learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(3), 317.Google Scholar
  33. Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of constructivist science learning environments in Korea. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(2), 239–249.Google Scholar
  34. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.Google Scholar
  35. Koh, N. K., & Fraser, B. J. (2014a). Learning environment associated with use of mixed mode delivery model among secondary business studies students in Singapore. Learning Environments Research, 17(2), 157–171.Google Scholar
  36. Koh, N. K., & Fraser, B. J. (2014b). Determinants of financial attitudes among secondary-school students in Singapore. World Studies in Education, 15(2), 41–52.Google Scholar
  37. Kroll, T., Barbour, R., & Harris, J. (2007). Using focus groups in disability research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(5), 690–698.Google Scholar
  38. Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17.Google Scholar
  39. Long, H. B. (1989). Self-directed learning: Emerging theory & practice. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  40. Long, H. B., & Redding, T. R. (1991). Self-directed learning dissertation abstracts 1966–1991. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  41. Majeed, A., Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. M. (2002). Learning environment and its association with student satisfaction among mathematics students in Brunei Darussalam. Learning Environments Research, 5(2), 203–226.Google Scholar
  42. Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 25, 17–30.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, D. L. (2002). Focus group interviewing. In Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 141–159).Google Scholar
  44. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.Google Scholar
  45. Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). The role of expectancy and self-efficacy beliefs. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research & Applications (3).Google Scholar
  46. Reeve, J., Ryan, R., Deci, E. L., & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications, (pp. 223–244).Google Scholar
  47. Relan, A. (1992). Motivational strategies in computer-based instruction: Some lessons from theories and models of motivation.Google Scholar
  48. Robertson, J. (2011). The educational affordances of blogs for self-directed learning. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1628–1644.Google Scholar
  49. Rowe, G. W., & Gregor, P. (1999). A computer based learning system for teaching computing: Implementation and evaluation. Computers & Education, 33(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  50. Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B. H. (2012). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 28(4), 366–378.Google Scholar
  51. Sink, C. A., & Spencer, L. R. (2005). My Class Inventory-Short Form as an accountability tool for elementary school counselors to measure classroom climate. Professional School Counseling, 9(1), 2156759X0500900112.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, B. (1998). Five methodology errors in educational research: The pantheon of statistical significance and other faux pas.Google Scholar
  54. Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  55. Tough, A. (1979). The adult’s learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning.Google Scholar
  56. Vogel, D., Kennedy, D., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2009). Does using mobile device applications lead to learning? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(4), 469–485.Google Scholar
  57. Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19–26.Google Scholar
  58. Wegener, R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Peer creation of e-learning materials to enhance learning success and satisfaction in an information systems course. In ECIS 2012 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  59. Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in science education, 38(3), 321–341.Google Scholar
  60. Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 749–768).Google Scholar
  61. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329.Google Scholar
  62. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39).Google Scholar
  63. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martínez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. Student perceptions in the classroom, 185–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Tan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations