Fuzzy Logic Based Improved Control Design Strategy for MPPT of Solar PV Systems

  • Rahul Bisht
  • Newton Kumar
  • Afzal SikanderEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1154)


Nowadays renewable energy sources have significant contribution in electrical engineering. The solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are in great demand as a non-conventional energy source. The performance of solar PV system is highly affected by temperature and irradiance in the surroundings. This may also leads to change the maximum available power of PV system. To achieve maximum power, this paper contributes a new control design strategy for MPPT of solar PV systems. The concept of fuzzy logic is being employed to design suitable control law. The performance of designed controller is tested with wide range of environmental parameters change. It is observed that the obtained results not only provide the fast dynamics but also high accuracy in power is achieved.


Maximum power point tracking Photovoltaic solar system Fuzzy logic Controller design DC-DC converter 


  1. 1.
    Vasantharaj, S., Vinodhkumar, G., Sasikumar, M.: Development of a fuzzy logic based, photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control system using boost converter. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Intelligent System (SEİSCON 2012), VCTW, Tiruchengode, Tamilnadu, India, pp. 2–5 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hua, C., Shen, C.: Control of DC/DC converters for solar energy system with maximum power tracking. In: Proceedings of the IECON’97 23rd International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, vol. 2, pp. 827–832 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy, C.P., Vijaybhaskar, C., Maity, T.: Modellıng of fuzzy logıc controller for varıable step MPPT ın photovoltaıc system. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2(8), 426–428 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Othman, A.M., El-arini M.M.M., Ghitas A., Fathy A.: Real world maximum power point tracking simulation of PV system based on fuzzy logic control. NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 1(2), 186–194 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jana, J., Bhattacharya, K.D., Saha H.: Design & implementation of MPPT algorithm for battery charging with photovoltaic panel using FPGA. IEEE, 1–5 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh, D., Yadav, R., Jyotsana.: Perturb and observe method MATLAB simulink and design of PV system using buck boost converter. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res. (IJSETR) 3(6) 235–239 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suresh, H., Baskaran, A., Sudharsan, K.P., Vignesh, U., Viveknath, T., Sivraj, P., Vijith, K., Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham.: Efficient charging of battery and production of power from solar energy. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Systems (ICES 2014). pp. 231–7 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kjær, S.B.: Evaluation of the “hill climbing” and the “incremental conductance” maximum power point trackers for photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Trans. Energy Conv. 27(4), 922–929 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Efendi, M.Z., Murdianto, F.D., Setiawan, R.E., Mubarak R.H.: Performance evaluation of MPPT using modified PSO algorithm for battery charge application. Int. Electron. Symp. Eng. Technol. Appl. (IES-ETA) (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Subudhi, B., Pradhan, R.: A new adaptive maximum power point controller for a photovoltaic system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 10(4), 1625–1632 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Latif, T., Hussain Syed, R.: Design of a charge controller based on sepic and buck topology using modified incremental conductance MPPT. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dhaka, Bangladesh; 20–22 December, 2014, vol. 27 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agarwal, J., Parmar, G., Gupta, R., Sikander, A.: Analysis of grey wolf optimizer based fractional order PID controller in speed control of DC motor. Microsyst. Technol. 24(12), 4997–5006 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sikander, A., Thakur, P.: Reduced order modelling of linear time-invariant system using modified cuckoo search algorithm. Soft. Comput. 22(10), 3449–3459 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verma, P., Patel, N., Nair, C.K., Sikander A.: Design of PID controller using cuckoo search algorithm for buck-boost converter of LED driver circuit. In: proceedings of 2nd Annual Southern Power Electronics Conference (SPEC) pp. 1–6. IEEE, New Zealand (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sikander, A., Prasad, R.: New technique for system simplification using Cuckoo search and ESA. Sadhana 42(9), 1453–1458 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhatt, R., Parmar, G., Gupta, R., Sikander, A.: Application of stochastic fractal search in approximation and control of LTI systems. Microsyst. Technol. 25(1), 105–114 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vimalarani, C., Kamaraj, N., Chitti Babu, B.: Improved method of maximum power point tracking of PV array using hybrid intelligent controller. Elsevier J. OPTIK 168, 403–415 (2018).
  18. 18.
    Noman, A..M., Addoweesh, K.E., Mashaly, H.M. A fuzzy logic control method for MPPT of PV systems, pp. 875–377. İEEE (2012). 978-1-4673-2421-2/12Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taherbaneh, M., Menhaj, M.B.: A fuzzy-based maximum power point tracker for body mounted solar panels in LEO satellites. In: 2007 IEEE/IAS Industrial & Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolsi, S., Samet, H., Ben, Amar M.: Design analysis of DC-DC converters connected to a photovoltaic generator and controlled by MPPT for optimal energy transfer throughout a clear day. J. Power Energy Eng. 2, 27–34 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Texas Instruments: Application report SLVA372C; November 2009, Revised January 2014. pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cho, S.Y., Lee, I.O., Moon, S., Moon, G.W., Kim, B.C., Kim, K.Y.: Constant Current Charging in Series-Series Compensated Nonradiative Wireless Power Link, 2792–2795. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ahamad, N., Uniyal, S., Sikander, A., Singh, G.: A comparative study of PID controller tuning techniques for time delay processes. UPB Sci. Bull. Series C Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 81(3), 129–142 (2019)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dave Mitulkumar, R., Dave, K.C.: Analysis of boost converter using PI control algorithms. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 3, 71–73 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yilmaz, U., Kircay, A., Borekci, S.: PV system fuzzy logic MPPT method and PI control as a charge controller. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 994–1001 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Instrumentation and Control EngineeringDr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, JalandharJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations