Advertisement

Performance of Support Vector Machines, Artificial Neural Network, and Random Forest for Identifying Banana Fusarium Wilt Using UAV-Based Multi-spectral Imagery

  • Huichun YeEmail author
  • Bei Cui
  • Shanyu Huang
  • Yingying Dong
  • Wenjiang HuangEmail author
  • Anting Guo
  • Yu Ren
  • Yu Jin
Conference paper
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 657)

Abstract

The Fusarium wilt of bananas currently threatens to the banana production areas worldwide. Timely monitoring of Fusarium wilt disease is very important for the disease treatment and crop planting adjustment. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the performance of support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multi-spectral imagery to identify the locations that were infested or not infested with banana Fusarium wilt. A total of 139 ground samples were surveyed to assess the occurrence of banana Fusarium wilt. The results showed that the overall accuracies of SVM, RF, and ANN were higher than 90% for the pixel based. Among the classifiers, SVM had the best performance, followed by ANN and RF. The maps generated by SVM, RF, and ANN appeared a similar distribution trend with regard to the occurrence of Fusarium wilt. The areas of the occurrence of Fusarium wilt were between 5.21 and 5.75 ha, accounting for 36.3–40.1% of the total planting area of bananas in the study area. The results also showed that the inclusion of the red-edge band had 2.9–3.0% increases in overall accuracy. The results of this study indicate that the SVM, RF, and ANN with UAV-based remote sensing imagery have the potential to identify and map the banana Fusarium wilt.

Keywords

Fusarium wilt Multi-spectral remote sensing Support vector machines Artificial neural network Random forest 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author expresses the appreciation of funds received from the Hainan Provincial Key R&D Program of China (ZDYF2018073), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41801352), Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation of Sanya, China (2016NK16), National Special Support Program for High-level Personnel Recruitment (Ten-thousand Talents Program) (Wenjiang Huang), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2017085).

References

  1. 1.
    Shen Z, Xue C, Penton CR, Thomashow LS, Zhang N, Wang B, Ruan Y, Li R, Shen Q (2019) Suppression of banana Panama disease induced by soil microbiome reconstruction through an integrated agricultural strategy. Soil Biol Biochem 128:164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ordonez N, Seidl MF, Waalwijk C, Drenth A, Kilian A, Thomma BPHJ, Ploetz RC, Kema GHJ (2015) Worse comes to worst: bananas and Panama disease-when plant and pathogen clones meet. PloS Pathog 11:e1005197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van den Berg N, Berger DK, Hein I, Birch PR, Wingfield MJ, Viljoen A (2007) Tolerance in banana to Fusarium wilt is associated with early up-regulation of cell wall-strengthening genes in the roots. Mol Plant Pathol 8:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin B, Shen H (2017) Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cubense. In: Wan F, Jiang M, Zhan A, (eds) Biological invasions and its management in China, vol 2. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 225–236Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shi Y, Huang W, Ye H, Ruan C, Xing N, Geng Y, Dong Y, Peng D (2018) Partial least square discriminant analysis based on normalized two-stage vegetation indices for mapping damage from rice diseases using PlanetScope datasets. Sensors 18:1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin X, Jie L, Wang S, Qi HJ, Li SW (2018) Classifying wheat hyperspectral pixels of healthy heads and Fusarium head blight disease using a deep neural network in the wild field. Remote Sens 10:395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahlein AK, Alisaac E, Al Masri A, Behmann J, Dehne HW, Oerke EC (2019) Comparison and combination of thermal, fluorescence, and hyperspectral imaging for monitoring Fusarium head blight of wheat on spikelet scale. Sensors 19:2281Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang W, Lamb DW, Niu Z, Zhang Y, Liu L, Wang J (2007) Identification of yellow rust in wheat using in-situ spectral reflectance measurements and airborne hyperspectral imaging. Precis Agric 8:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang W, Guan Q, Luo J, Zhang J, Zhao J, Liang D, Huang L, Zhang D (2014) New optimized spectral indices for identifying and monitoring winter wheat diseases. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7:2516–2524Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shi Y, Huang W, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Luke B, Dong Y, Zheng Q, Ma H, Liu L (2018) Wavelet-based rust spectral feature set (WRSFs): a novel spectral feature set based on continuous wavelet transformation for tracking progressive host-pathogen interaction of yellow rust on wheat. Remote Sens 10:525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang J, Liao H, Zhu Y, Sun J, Sun Q, Liu X (2012) Hyperspectral detection of rice damaged by rice leaf folder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis). Comput Electron Agr 82:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang CM (2010) Assessment of the severity of bacterial leaf blight in rice using canopy hyperspectral reflectance. Precis Agric 11:61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dhau I, Adam E, Mutanga O, Ayisi K, Abdel-Rahman EM, Odindi J, Masocha M (2018) Testing the capability of spectral resolution of the new multispectral sensors on detecting the severity of grey leaf spot disease in maize crop. Geocarto Int 33:1223–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xie Q, Dash J, Huang W, Peng D, Qin QM, Mortimer H, Casa R, Pignatti S, Laneve G, Pascucci S, Dong Y, Ye H (2018) Vegetation indices combining the red and red-edge spectral information for leaf area index retrieval. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 11:1482–1493Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Filella I, Penuelas J (1994) The red edge position and shape as indicators of plant chlorophyll content, biomass and hydric status. Int J Remote Sens 15:1459–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dash J, Curran PJ (2004) The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index. Int J Remote Sens 25:5403–5413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng Q, Huang W, Cui X, Shi Y, Liu L (2018) New spectral index for detecting wheat yellow rust using Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery. Sensors 18:868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ma H, Jing Y, Huang W, Shi Y, Dong Y, Zhang J, Liu L (2018) Integrating early growth information to monitor winter wheat powdery mildew using multi-temporal Landsat-8 imagery. Sensors 18:3290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thanh Noi P, Kappas M (2018) Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors 18:18Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rumpf T, Mahlein AK, Steiner U, Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Plümer L (2010) Early detection and classification of plant diseases with support vector machines based on hyperspectral reflectance. Comput Electron Agr 74:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chemura A, Mutanga O, Dube T (2017) Separability of coffee leaf rust infection levels with machine learning methods at Sentinel-2 MSI spectral resolutions. Precis Agric 18:859–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raczko E, Zagajewski B (2017) Comparison of support vector machine, random forest and neural network classifiers for tree species classification on airborne hyperspectral APEX images. Eur J Remote Sens 50:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun LY, Schulz K (2015) The improvement of land cover classification by thermal remote sensing. Remote Sens 7:8368–8390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feng Q, Liu J, Gong J (2015) UAV remote sensing for urban vegetation mapping using random forest and texture analysis. Remote Sens 7:1074–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheng G, Han JW, Zhou PC, Guo L (2014) Multi-class geospatial object detection and geographic image classification based on collection of part detectors. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 98:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    George R, Padalia H, Kushwaha SPS (2014) Forest tree species discrimination in western Himalaya using EO-1 Hyperion. J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 28:140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ma L, Fu T, Blaschke T, Li M, Tiede D, Zhou Z, Ma X, Chen D (2017) Evaluation of feature selection methods for object-based land cover mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery using random forest and support vector machine classifiers. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dixon B, Candade N (2008) Multispectral land use classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both? Int J Remote Sens 29:1185–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang C, Davis LS, Townshend JRG (2002) An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 23:725–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Omer G, Mutanga O, Abdel-Rahman EM, Adam E (2015) Performance of support vector machines and artificial neural network for mapping endangered tree species using worldview-2 data in Dukuduku Forest, South Africa. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8:4825–4840Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Foody GM (2009) Classification accuracy comparison: hypothesis tests and the use of confidence intervals in evaluations of difference, equivalence and non-inferiority. Remote Sens Environ 113:1658–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huichun Ye
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bei Cui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shanyu Huang
    • 3
  • Yingying Dong
    • 1
  • Wenjiang Huang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anting Guo
    • 1
    • 4
  • Yu Ren
    • 1
    • 4
  • Yu Jin
    • 5
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Digital Earth ScienceAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Earth ObservationSanyaChina
  3. 3.Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering Planning and DesignBeijingChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.School of Electronics and Information EngineeringAnhui UniversityHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations