Crushing Behavior of Thick Circular High Strength Aluminum Tube Against Quasi-static Axial Loading

  • Vivek PatelEmail author
  • Sanket Suresh Kalantre
  • Gaurav Tiwari
  • Ravikumar Dumpala
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The present study investigates the crushing performance of circular tube, made of high strength aluminum alloy AA-7005 and AA-7075 by numerically and experimentally. The tubular structures were exposed to quasi-static axial loading with variation in length (51, 68 and 85 mm) while diameter (34 mm) and thickness (3.55 mm) kept constant. The uni-axial tension tests for both the material were carried out to explore the behavior of stress–strain which was used as input for numerical simulations. The quasi-static compression test was conducted on Instron compressive testing machine while for simulation finite element code LS-Dyna was used. The crashworthiness parameters such as initial maximum peak load, crash force efficiency, energy absorption capacity, and specific energy were found from the obtained deformation behavior of structures. It is found that the tubular structures made of AA-7005 show higher crash force efficiency whereas the structures made of AA-7075 absorb significantly higher energy during the collapse.


Thick tubular structures Crashworthiness Quasi-static axial loading LS-Dyna 


  1. 1.
    Alexander JM (1960) An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading. Q J Mech Appl Math XIII:10MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pugsley SA, Macaulay M (1960) The large-scale crumpling of thin cylindrical columns. Q J Mech Appl Math 8:1MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrews KRF, England GL, Ghani E (1983) Classification of the axial collapse of cylindrical tubes under quasi-static loading. Int J Mech Sci 25:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones N, Abramowicz W (1985) Static and dynamic axial crushing of circular and square tubes. In: Proceedings of symposium on metal forming and impact mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 225Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karagiozova D, Jones N Dynamic effects on buckling and energy absorption of cylindrical shells under axial impact. Thin Wall StructGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reddy et al (2015) Multi-cornered thin-walled sheet metal members for enhanced crashworthiness and occupant protection. Thin Wall Struct 94:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abbasi et al (2015) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of multi-cornered thin-walled sheet metal members. Thin Wall Struct 89:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reyes A, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS (2003) Square aluminum tubes subjected to oblique loading. Int J Impact Eng 28(10):1077–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossi A, Fawaz Z, Behdinan K (2005) Numerical simulation of the axial collapse of thin-walled polygonal section tubes. Thin Wall Struct 43(10):1646–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang X, Huh H (2010) Crushing analysis of polygonal columns and angle elements. Int J Impact Eng 37(4):441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hallquist J (2006) L.-D.K.U.s. Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Google Scholar, 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations