Advertisement

Welfare Effects of Investments and Input Subsidies

  • Seema BathlaEmail author
  • Pramod Kumar Joshi
  • Anjani Kumar
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

This chapter measures the effects of various types of public expenditure on welfare at the disaggregate state level, in terms of agricultural productivity and rural poverty.

References

  1. Ahluwalia, M. S. (1985). Rural Poverty, Agricultural Production, and Prices: A Re-Examination. In J. W. Mellor & G. M. Desai (Eds.), Agricultural change and rural poverty. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bathla, S. (2014). Public and private capital formation and agricultural growth: State-wise analysis of inter-linkages during pre- and Post-reform periods. Agriculture Economics Research Review, 27(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathla, S., P. K. Joshi, & A. Kumar. (2019). Targeting agricultural investments and input subsidies in the low-income and lagging regions of India. The European Journal of Development Research.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00207-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desai, S., Vashishtha, P., & Joshi, O. (2015). Mahatma gandhi national rural employment guarantee act: A catalyst for rural transformation. New Delhi: National Council of Applied Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Dhawan, B. D. (1998). Studies in agricultural investments and rural Savings. New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Fan, S., P. Hazell, & S. K. Thorat. (1999). Linkages between government spending, growth and poverty in rural India. Research Report 10. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. http://www.ifpri.org/publication/linkages-between-government-spending-growth-and-poverty-rural-india-0.
  8. Fan, S. (Ed.). (2008). Public expenditures, growth and poverty: Lessons from developing countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fan, S., Gulati, A., & Thorat, S. (2008). Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India. Agricultural Economics, 39(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Haque, T. (2000). Targeting public investments by agroecological zone to achieve growth and poverty alleviation goals in rural India. Food Policy, 25(4), 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulati, A., & S. Bathla. (2002). Capital formation in Indian agriculture: Trends, composition and implications for growth. Occasional Paper No. 24. Mumbai, India: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.Google Scholar
  12. Himanshu. (2016). A decade of MGNREGA. Livemint, Feb 3. http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/IfCOJJUL4MrKmsJgV0LiCM/A-decade-of-MGNREGA.html.
  13. India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Agricultural statistics at a glance (1980 to 2014). New Delhi, India: Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Department of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  14. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kumar, A., Kumar, P., & Sharma, A. N. (2011). Rural poverty and agricultural growth in India: Implications for the twelth five year plan. Indian Journal of Agriculture Economics, 66(3), 269–278.Google Scholar
  16. Manjunatha, A. V., & Kumar, P. (2015). Impact of national food security mission (NFSM) on input use, production, yield and income in Karnataka. Bangalore: Institute of Social and Economic Change.Google Scholar
  17. Mogues, T., Fan, S., & Benin, S. (2015). Public investments in and for agriculture. The European Journal of Development Research, 27, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). Why should we use sem? Pros and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research-online, 8(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
  19. Saith, A. (1981). Production, prices and poverty in rural India. Journal of Development Studies, 19, 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Srinivasan, T. N. (1985). Agricultural Production, Relative Prices, Entitlements and Poverty. In J. W. Mellor & B. M. Desai (Eds.), Agricultural change and rural poverty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modelling. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seema Bathla
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pramod Kumar Joshi
    • 2
  • Anjani Kumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Regional DevelopmentJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.South Asia RegionInternational Food Policy Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.South Asia RegionInternational Food Policy Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations