Advertisement

Framing Professional Development Now

  • Dennis SaleEmail author
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the Cognitive Science and Technology book series (CSAT)

Abstract

This chapter offers an evidence-based approach to framing and implementing a professional development approach to address both issues of perceived usefulness by teaching professionals themselves, as well as viability in the real world of educational institutions. While we know what knowledge, strategies and methods are most likely to enhance teaching expertise, and how to conduct the professional development process to achieve positive outcomes, good professional learning comes at a cost in terms of time and resources. Hence, both individuals and institutions have to decide what is most viable in their personal and professional contexts.

References

  1. Bandler R, Grinder J (1990) Frogs into princes: the introduction to neuro-linguistic programming. Eden Grove Editions, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar
  2. Berliner DC (2004) Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bull Sci Technol Soc 24(3):200–212MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caine G, Caine R (2001) The brain education and the competitive edge. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MDzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Clouder DL (2000) Reflective practice: realising its potential. Physiotherapy 86(10):517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costa AL, Garmston RJ (2002) Cognitive coaching: a foundation for renaissance schools. Christopher-Gordon Publishers Inc, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa AL, Garmston RJ, Zimmerman DP (2014) Investing in teacher quality. Teacher College Press, New York Google Scholar
  7. Costa AL, Garmston RJ (2016) Cognitive coaching: developing self-directed leaders and learners. Rowman & Littlefield, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond L, Rothman R (2015) Teaching in the flat world: learning from high-performing systems. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickinson M (2015) Evolution of an e-learning developer guide instructional design and project management. In: Waldrop JB, Bowden MA (eds) Best practices for flipping the college classroom. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Dilts R et al (1980) Neuro-linguistic programming Vol. 1: the study of the structure of subjective experience. Meta Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas JD (1984) Creative interviewing. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  12. Downey M (2003) Effective coaching: lessons from the coaches’ coach. Texere Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Duffy GG (1993) Teachers’ progress toward becoming expert strategy teachers. Elementary Sch J 94:109–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy GG et al (2010) Teacher as metacognitive professionals. In: Hacker D, Dunlosky J, Graesser A (eds) Handbook of metacognition in education. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. Economist Magazine (2018) What other countries and learn from Singapore’s schools. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/08/30/what-other-countries-can-learn-from-singapores-schools
  16. Gallup Pool Organization (2014) The state of American schoolsGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallwey TW (1987) The inner game of tennis. Jonathan Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaser J (2014) Conversational intelligence: how great leaders build trust and get extraordinary results. Bibliomotion, Brookline, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Goh CT (1997) Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chook Tong at the opening of the 7th international conference on thinking on Monday, 2 June at The Suntec City Convention Centre, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  20. Gulamhussein A (2013) Teaching the teachers: effective professional development in an era of high stakes accountability. National School Boards Association, Centre for Public EducationGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall LM (2001) The spirit of NLP. Crown House Publishing, BethelGoogle Scholar
  22. Harari YN (2016) Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow. Vintage, Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hargreaves A, Evans R (1997) Beyond educational reform: bringing teachers back in. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  24. Hargreaves A, Fullan M (2012) Professional capital: transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris S (2010) The moral landscape: how science can determine human values. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hatano G, Inagaki K (1986) Two courses of expertise. Child development and education in Japan, pp 262–272Google Scholar
  27. Hattie J (2003) Teachers make a difference: what is the research evidence? Distinguishing expert teachers from novice and experienced teachers. Australian Council for Educational ResearchGoogle Scholar
  28. Hattie J (2009) Visible learning. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Huberman M (1990) Linkage between researchers and practitioners: a qualitative study. Am Educ Res J 27:363–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joyce BR, Showers B (2002) Student achievement through staff development, 3rd edn. ASCD, Alexandria, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Kabat-Zin J (2003) Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 10(2):144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahneman D (2012) Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Kanfer R, Kanfer F (1991) Goals and self-regulation: applications of theory to work settings. In: Maehr M, Pintrich PR (eds) Advances in metacognition and achievement, vol 7. JAI Press, Greenswich, CN, pp 287–326Google Scholar
  34. Kennedy M (1999) The role of preservice teacher education. In Darling-Hammond L, Sykes G (eds) Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  35. Knowles M (1984) Andragogy in action. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  36. Darling-Hammond et al. (2009) Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development CouncilGoogle Scholar
  37. Lave J, Wenger E (1993) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral engagement. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee YS (1995) The Straits Times, July 1Google Scholar
  39. Leithwood et al (2004) How leadership influences student learning. University of Minnesota Center for Applied Research and Educational ImprovementGoogle Scholar
  40. Levin B (2008) How to change 5000 schools. Harvard Education Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Lincoln YS (1990) The making of a constructivist: a remembrance of transformations past. In: Guba EG (ed) The paradigm dialog. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Lortie DL (1975) Schoolteacher. University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin R (2009) The design of business. Harvard Business Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  44. Pentland A (2014) Social physics: how good ideas spread—the lessons from a new science. Scribe Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Petty G (2015) Resources provided on Geoff Petty Homepage. Can be accessed at https://geoffpetty.com/
  46. Piaget J (2001) The psychology of intelligence. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Pinker S (2019) Enlightenment now. Penguin, U.K.Google Scholar
  48. Piper E (2017) Not a day care: the devastating consequences of abandoning truth. Salem, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  49. Powell W, Kusuma-Powell O (2013) The OIQ factor: raising your schools organizational intelligence. John Catt Educational Ltd, Melton, WoodbridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Powell W, Kusuma-Powell O (2015) Teacher self-supervision: why teacher evaluation has failed and what we can do about it. John Catt, Suffolk, UKGoogle Scholar
  51. Reimers FM, Chung CK (2016) Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  52. Research Alert (2014) Educational Leadership May 2014, vol 71, no 8. Professional learning reimagined. (https://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may14/vol71/num08/Double-Take.aspx). Last accessed 15 Nov 2019
  53. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C (2008) Mirrors in the mind: how we share our actions and emotions. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Robbins A (2001) Unlimited power. Pocket books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Rogers A (1998) Teaching adults. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2017) Self determination theory: basic needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Sale D (2004) Promoting thinking: a Singaporean response. SPGG JGoogle Scholar
  58. Sale D (2014) The challenge of reframing engineering education. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sale D, Cheah SM, Wan M (2018) 3 paper symposia on enhancing students’ intrinsic motivation: an evidence-based approach. In: ERAS-APERA international conference, Singapore, 12–14 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  60. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Schön DA (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  62. Singapore Infopedia. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/. Last accessed 7 Nov 2019
  63. Stigler JW, Hiebert J (1999) The teaching gap. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Stringer E (2004) Action research in education. Pearson, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  65. Swaab D (2015) We are our brains. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Tan J, Gopinathan S (2000) Education reform in Singapore: towards greater creativity and innovation. NIRA Rev 7(3):5–10Google Scholar
  67. Tan OS, Low EL (2016). Singapore’s systemic approach to teaching and learning twenty-first century competencies. In: Reimers FM, Chung CK (eds) Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century: educational goals, policies, and curricula from six nations. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts Google Scholar
  68. Timperley H et al (2008) Best evidence synthesis on professional learning and development. Report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  69. Treadwell M (2017) The future of learning. The Global Curriculum Project, Mount Maunganui, NZGoogle Scholar
  70. Willingham DT (2009) Why don’t students like school: a cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  71. Windschitl M (2002) Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: an analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Rev Educ Res 72:131–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Winget L (2017) What’s wrong with damn near everything!: how the collapse of core values is destroying us and how to fix it. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Singapore PolytechnicSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations