Advertisement

Overarching Framework: Learning to Learn

  • Chong Ho Yu
  • Hyun Seo Lee
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

While Germany and Japan strongly responded to their unexpected low scores after their participation in PISA in 2000 and 2003, respectively, the first noticeable public discourse within the US about international assessments happened in 2010 (Martens and Niemann in German Polit 22: 314–332, 2013; Wiseman in How the world learns: comparative educational systems. The Teaching Company, Chantilly, VA, 2015)

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhus, D. A., & Thompson, K. W. (2006). Addressing the nature of science in preservice science teacher preparation programs: science educator perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boekaerts, M. (2009). Goal-directed behaviors in the classroom. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield Chan (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 105–122). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bransford, J. D. (Ed.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, K. K., & Rao, N. (2009). Moving beyond paradoxes: Understanding Chinese learners and their teachers. In C. K. K. Chan, & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education: CERC Studies in Comparative Education (Vol. 25, pp. 3–34). Hong Kong: Springer/Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  7. Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Learning to learn-The way forward in curriculum development. Hong Kong: Author. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/mobile/en/curriculum-development/cs-curriculum-doc-report/wf-in-cur/index.html.
  8. Curriculum Development Council. (2015). Promotion of STEM education: Unleashing potential in innovation. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/Brief%20on%20STEM%20(Overview)_eng_20151105.pdf.
  9. Delors, J., et al. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001095/109590eo.pdf.
  10. Duncan, A. (2010). The vision of education reform in the United States. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/vision-education-reform-united-states-secretary-arne-duncans-remarks-united-nations-ed.
  11. Duncan, A. (2011). Lessons from high-performing countries. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/lessons-high-performing-countries.
  12. Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22, 2109–2139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Regaining focus in Irish junior cycle science: Potential new directions for curriculum and assessment development on nature of science. Irish Educational Studies, 33, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forestier, K. (2018). Hong Kong education reform continues, but Beijing’s role presents new challenges. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2131727/hong-kong-education-reform-continues-beijings-role-presents.
  15. Forestier, K., & Crossley, M. (2015). International education policy transfer–borrowing both ways: the Hong Kong and England experience. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45, 664–685,  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.928508.
  16. Gove, M. (2013). Written statement to Parliament: Education Secretary Michael Gove sets out plans for the new national curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/education-reform-schools.
  17. Grobler, G. C. (2016a). Interdisciplinary forensic science programme. Hong Kong Science Teachers’ Journal, 31, 14–18.Google Scholar
  18. Grobler, G. C. (2016b). Let our students teach! Teaching as a way of mastering knowledge. Hong Kong Teacher’s Journal, 32, 79–83.Google Scholar
  19. Holton, G., Rutherford, J., & Watson, F. (1970). Project physics: Handbook. Cambridge, MA: Project Physics.Google Scholar
  20. Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2015). Science education key learning area: Physics curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/science-edu/Phy_C&A_Guide_updated_e_20151126.pdf.
  21. Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2017a). Secondary education curriculum guide: Ongoing renewal of the school curriculum. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  22. Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2017b). Secondary education curriculum guide: Information technology for interactive learning: Towards self-directed learning. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2017c). Mathematics education. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/ma/index.html.
  24. Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2017d). Supplement to the science education key learning area curriculum guide. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/science-edu/IS_C&A_Guide_updated_e_151126.pdf.
  25. Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2018). Ongoing renewal of the school curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/renewal/index.html.
  26. Hong Kong Education Commission. (1999). Review of education system: Framework for education reform. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  27. Hong Kong Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Author. Retrieved from https://www.e-c.edu.hk/doc/en/publications_and_related_documents/education_reform/Edu-reform-eng.pdf.
  28. Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2016). Category A: Senior secondary subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/hkdse/assessment/subject_information/category_a_subjects/hkdse_subj.html?A1&1&4.
  29. Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2018). Assessment Framework for 2021 HKDSE. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/hkdse/hkdse_subj.html?A1&1&4_1.
  30. Jones, L., & Moore, R. (1995). Appropriating competence: The competency movement, the new right and the ‘culture change’ project. British Journal of Education and Work, 8(2), 78–92.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0269000950080206.
  31. Kennedy, K. J. (2011). Changing schools for changing times: New directions for the school curriculum in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Is nature of science going, going, going, gone? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu, C. K. (2016). The positive impact of teaching nature of science on students via scientific experiments. Hong Kong Science Teachers Journal, 32, 84–119.Google Scholar
  34. Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on education policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22, 314–332.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2013.794455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. May, T., & Qin, A. (2019). The high school course Beijing accuses of radicalizing Hong Kong. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/01/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-education-china.html.
  36. McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  37. McComas, W. F. (2002). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies.Google Scholar
  39. Olson, J. K. (2018). The inclusion of the Nature of Science in nine recent international science education standards documents. Science & Education, 27, 637–660.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9993-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development [OECD]. (1996). Lifelong learning for all: Meeting of the education committee at ministerial level. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  41. Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development [OECD]. (2009). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn: Student engagement, strategies, and practices. Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852630.pdf.
  42. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2012). Lessons from PISA for the United States; Shanghai and Hong Kong. Paris: Author. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-5-en.
  43. Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development [OECD]. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris; Author. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
  44. Poon, A., & Wong, Y. C. (2005). Equity vs excellence: A preliminary exploration of Hong Kong’s education reform. Centre for Asian Pacific Studies. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a0b0/ed0cca549370ecb3b040539fedf9c7c20dc5.pdf.
  45. Poon, A. Y. K., & Wong, Y.-C. (2008). Education reform in Hong Kong: The “through-road” model and its societal consequences. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 54(1), 33–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-007-9073-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 71–196). New York, NY: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
  47. Sieh, M. (2019). Hong Kong school course promotes critical thinking on rule of law. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/families/article/1826831/secondary-school-course-promotes-critical-thinking-rule-law.
  48. Sawyer, K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tan, C. (2019). Competence or performance? A Bernsteinian analysis of basic competency assessment in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Studies, 67, 235–250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1423461.
  50. Tsatsaroni, A., & Evans, J. (2014). Adult numeracy and the totally pedagogised society: PIAAC and other international surveys in the context of global educational policy on lifelong learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 167–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9470-x.
  51. Tuijnman, A., & Boström, A. K. (2002). Changing notions of lifelong education and lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 48, 93–109.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015601909731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiseman, A. (2015). How the world learns: Comparative educational systems. Chantilly, VA: The Teaching Company.Google Scholar
  53. Wong, P. W. (2018). STEM for parents. Hong Kong: Shing Tao Publisher.Google Scholar
  54. Wong, M. W. K, & Wong, C. H. (2019). Extradition protests a chance for Hong Kong schools to teach critical thinking and polite debate. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/3014911/extradition-protests-chance-hong-kong-schools-teach-critical.
  55. Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2009). Motives to self-regulate learning: A social cognitive account. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 1247–1264). New York, NY: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chong Ho Yu
    • 1
  • Hyun Seo Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Azusa Pacific UniversityAzusaUSA
  2. 2.Azusa Pacific UniversityAzusaUSA

Personalised recommendations