Psychosocial Factors Associated with Death Penalty: Impact on Families of Victims, Families of Defendants and the “Others”

  • Sanjeev P. SahniEmail author
  • Mohita Junnarkar


The extant literature on death penalty is mostly focused upon arguments in favor or in opposition to death penalty as a punishment for heinous crimes such as murder.


  1. Adcock, C. F. (2010). The collateral anti-therapeutic effects of the death penalty. Florida Coastal Law Review, 11(2), 289–320.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., Veronen, L. J., & Smith, S. (1989). Family survivors of homicide victims: Theoretical perspectives and an exploratory study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
  4. Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., & Resnick, H. S. (1991). Homicide as a risk factor for PTSD among surviving family members. Behavior Modification, 15(4), 545–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amnesty International. (2007). The death penalty v. human rights: Why abolish the death penalty? Retrieved from
  6. Antonio, M. E. (2006). I didn’t know it'd be so hard-jurors’ emotional reactions to serving on a capital trial. Judicature, 89(5), 282–288.Google Scholar
  7. Antonio, M. E. (2008). Stress and the capital jury: How male and female jurors react to serving on a murder trial. Justice System Journal, 29(3), 396–407.Google Scholar
  8. Armour, M. P. (2002). Journey of family members of homicide victims: A qualitative study of their posthomicide experience. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(3), 372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asaro, M. R. (2001). Working with adult homicide survivors, part I: Impact and sequelae of murder. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 37(3), 95–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandes, S. (2000). When victims seek closure: Forgiveness, vengeance and the role of government. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 27(5), 1599–1606.Google Scholar
  11. Bandes, S. (2009). Victims, “closure”, and the sociology of emotion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  12. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of moral education, 31(2), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bandura, A. (2008). Moral disengagement in state executions. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law (pp. 515–518). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Barnett, C. (1995). Covering executions. American Journalism Review, 17, 27–39.Google Scholar
  16. Beck, E., Blackwell, B. S., Leonard, P. B., & Mears, M. (2002). Seeking sanctuary: Interviews with family members of capital defendants. Cornell Law Review, 88(2), 382–418.Google Scholar
  17. Berns, N. (2009). Contesting the victim card: Closure discourse and emotion in death penalty rhetoric. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(3), 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bienen, L. B. (1992). Helping jurors out: Post-verdict debriefing for jurors in emotionally disturbing trials. Indiana Law Journal, 68(4), 1333–1355.Google Scholar
  19. Burns, J. L. (2006). Families of homicide victims speak: An examination of perceptions of the criminal justice system and capital punishment (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University). Retrieved from
  20. Chinni, D., & Grier, P. (2001, June 11). For survivors, execution isn’t the end. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from
  21. Death Penalty Information Center. (2015). International polls and studies. Retrieved from
  22. DeLilly, L. M. (2014). Antithetical to human dignity: Secondary trauma, evolving standards of decency, and the unconstitutional consequences of state-sanctioned executions. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 23, 107–145.Google Scholar
  23. Doka, K. J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief. In K. J. Doka (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow (pp. 3–11). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. Eaton, J., & Christensen, T. (2014). Closure and its myths: Victims’ families, the death penalty, and the closure argument. International Review of Victimology, 20(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eschholz, S., Reed, M. D., Beck, E., & Leonard, P. B. (2003). Offenders’ family members’ responses to capital crimes: The need for restorative justice initiatives. Homicide studies, 7(2), 154–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freinkel, A., Koopman, C., & Speigel, D. (1994). Dissociative symptoms in media eyewitnesses of an execution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(9), 1335–1339.Google Scholar
  27. Gil, A., Johnson, M. B., & Johnson, I. (2006). Secondary trauma associated with state executions: Testimony regarding execution procedures. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 34(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodwin, M. L. (1997). An eyeful for an eye-an argument against allowing the families of murder victims to view executions. Brandeis Journal of Family Law, 36(4), 585–608.Google Scholar
  29. Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2009). Abolishing the death penalty worldwide: The impact of a “new dynamic”. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, R. (2005). Death work a study of the modern execution process (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, R. (2016). Executioners at work: Collateral consequences of executions for officers working on death row and in the death house. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 307–324). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from
  32. Jones, S. J., & Beck, E. (2007). Disenfranchised grief and nonfinite loss as experienced by the families of death row inmates. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 54(4), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, R. (2003). Don’t kill in our names: Families of murder victims speak out against the death penalty. New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  34. King, K. (2004). It hurts so bad: Comparing grieving patterns of the families of murder victims with those of families of death row inmates. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, R. (2006). The impact of capital punishment on families of defendants and murder victims’ family members. Judicature, 89(5), 292–296.Google Scholar
  36. King, R., & Norgard, K. (1999). What about our families-using the impact on death row defendants’ family members as a mitigating factor in death penalty sentencing hearings. Florida State University Law Review, 26(4), 1119–1176.Google Scholar
  37. Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York, USA: Scribner.Google Scholar
  38. Lacock, T., & Radelet, M. (2009). Do executions lower homicide rates?: The views of leading criminologists. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 99(2), 489–508.Google Scholar
  39. Lifton, R. J., & Mitchell, G. (2000). Who owns death? Capital punishment, the American conscience, and the end of executions. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  40. Logan, W. A. (1999). Declaring life at the crossroads of death: Victims’ anti-death penalty views and prosecutors’ charging decisions. Criminal Justice Ethics, 18(2), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Madeira, J. L. (2010). “Why rebottle the genie?”: Capitalizing on closure in death penalty proceedings. Indiana Law Journal, 85(4), 1477–1525.Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell, P. (2013, October 25). The weight of capital punishment on jurors, justices, governors, & executioners. Verdict. Retrieved from
  43. Nicolau, I. (2013). Historical evolution of the death penalty abolition as a fundamental human right. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5(2), 278.Google Scholar
  44. Osofsky, M. J., & Osofsky, H. J. (2002). The psychological experience of security officers who work with executions. Psychiatry, 65(4), 358–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Osofsky, M. J., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 371–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Penal Reform International. (2014). Fighting for clients’ lives: The impact of the death penalty on defence lawyers. Retrieved from
  47. Penal Reform International. (2015a). UN Secretary-General’s 2015 report to the Human Rights Council on the death penalty Submission by Penal Reform International (PRI). Retrieved from
  48. Penal Reform International. (2015b). Prison guards and the death penalty. Retrieved from
  49. Radelet, M. L., & Borg, M. J. (2000). The changing nature of death penalty debates. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rainer, J. (2013). Life after loss: Contemporary grief counseling and therapy. Eau Claire, USA: PESI Publishing & Media.Google Scholar
  51. Robertson, O., & Brett, R. (2013). Lightening the load of the parental death penalty on children. Quaker United Nations Office.Google Scholar
  52. Seemungal, F., Seal, L., & Black, L. (2016). Death penalty and its impact on the professionals involved in the execution process. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 295–306). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from
  53. Shaheed, A., & Sanei, F. (2016). Outlier: Iran and its use of the death penalty. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 181–209). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from
  54. Sharp, S. F. (2005). Hidden victims: The effects of the death penalty on families of the accused. New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sharp, S. F. (2016). Hidden victims: The families of those facing the death penalty. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 222–235). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from
  56. Sheffer, S. (2013). Fighting for their lives: Inside the experience of capital defense attorneys. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ssuubi, F. (2016). The impact of the death penalty on the children with a parent on death row or executed. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 236–251). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from
  58. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2012). Moving away from the death penalty: Lessons from national experience. Retrieved from
  59. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2013, July 24). Question of the death penalty—Report of the Secretary-General (Report no: A/HRC/24/18). Retrieved from
  60. Vandiver, M. (1998). The impact of the death penalty on the families of homicide victims and of condemned prisoners. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 477–505). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  61. Vandiver, M., & Berardo, F. M. (2000). ‘It’s like dying every day’: The families of condemned prisoners. Families, Crime and Criminal Justice, 2, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhigang, Y. (2009). Abolition or retention: Rethinking the death penalty in China. Social Sciences in China, 30(2), 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zinzow, H. M., Rheingold, A. A., Hawkins, A. O., Saunders, B. E., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2009). Losing a loved one to homicide: Prevalence and mental health correlates in a national sample of young adults. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(1), 20–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jindal Institute of Behavioural SciencesO. P. Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations