Advertisement

In Neoliberal Times

  • Chris Dolan
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Educational Leadership Theory book series (ELT)

Abstract

The ‘meteoric’ expansion of academic inquiry into neoliberalism (Springer, 2012, p.135) over the last two decades has undone scholarly consensus about its meanings and effects. Disagreements have emerged over the way the ‘academic growth concept’ (Flew, 2012, p. 44) of neoliberalism should be apprehended and about its power and pervasiveness across social fields such as education. To commence this chapter, I flag an a priori concern about neoliberalism’s burgeoning literature catalogue and the enormous breadth and depth of its contexts and applications and the contemporaneous disappearance of unifying structure or coherent meaning.

References

  1. ACARA. (2013). MySchool. Retrieved from www.myschool.edu.au
  2. AITSL. (2015). Australian professional standard for principals. Retrieved from www.aitsl.edu.au/lead-develop/understand-the-principal-standard:
  3. Angus, L. (2012). Teaching within and against the circle of privilege: Reforming teachers, reforming schools. Journal of Education Policy, 27(2), 231–251.Google Scholar
  4. Angus, L. (2015). School choice: Neoliberal education policy and imagined futures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.Google Scholar
  6. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, P. L. J. (2013). The policy dispositif: Historical formation and method. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 807–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ball, S. J. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education ceremony: Towards the performative society. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 210–226). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class the selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011a). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639.Google Scholar
  12. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011b). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: Some necessary but insufficient analyses. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 611–624.Google Scholar
  13. Bansel, P. (2014). The subject of policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bartlett, L., Frederick, M., Gulbrandsen, T., & Murillo, E. (2002). The marketization of education: Public schools for private ends. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 33(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bates, A. (2013). Transcending systems thinking in education reform: Implications for policy-makers and school leaders. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernstein, B. B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Binkley, S. (2009). The work of neoliberal governmentality: Temporality and ethical substance in the tale of two dads. Foucault Studies, 6, 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  19. Buras, K. L., & Apple, M. W. (2005). School choice, neoliberal promises, and unpromising evidence. Educational Policy, 19(3), 550–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Butler, J. (2004). What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In S. Salih (Ed.), The Judith Butler reader (pp. 302–321). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2015). Making policy move: Towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarke, M. (2013). Terror/enjoyment: Performativity, resistance and the teacher’s psyche. London Review of Education, 11(3), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Davies, B., & Bansell, P. (2010). Governmentality and academic work: Shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26(3), 5–20.Google Scholar
  25. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Derrida, J., & Roudinesco, E. (2004). For what tomorrow: A dialogue. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dey, P. (2014). Governing the social through ‘social entrepreneurship’: A Foucauldian view of ‘the art of governing’ in advanced liberalism. In H. Douglas & S. Grant (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship and enterprise (pp. 55–72). Melbourne, Australia: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P.-L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flew, T. (2012). Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and contemporary neo-liberalism debates. Thesis Eleven, 108(1), 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flynn, T. (2006). Foucault’s mapping of history. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1, an introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M. (1980a). Confessions of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 194–228). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, M. (1980b). Questions of geography. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 63–77). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  37. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et écrits (Tome III, 1976–1979). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  39. Foucault, M. (1996). The archaeology of knowledge. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961–1984 (pp. 57–65). New York: Semiotext[e].Google Scholar
  40. Foucault, M. (1997). What is critique? In S. Lotringer & L. Hochroth (Eds.), The politics of truth (pp. 23–82). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  41. Foucault, M. (2000). Polemics, politics and problematizations (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 111–120). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Foucault, M. (2002). So is it important to think? In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power (pp. 454–458). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Gale, T. (2001). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Giroux, H. A. (2008). Against the terror of neoliberalism: Politics beyond the age of greed. London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Gobby, B. (2017). Problematisations, practices and subjectivation. In G. Lakomski, S. Eacott, & C. W. Evers (Eds.), Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organisations (pp. 86–99). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Gordon, C. (1991). Introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Grace, G. R. (1995). School leadership-beyond education management: An essay in policy scholarship. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  49. Graham, L. J. (2011). The product of text and ‘other’ statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gunter, H. (2013). Researching and conceptualising the field. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hattam, R., & Zipin, L. (2009). Towards pedagogical justice. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 297–301.Google Scholar
  52. Heffernan, A. (2018). The principal and school improvement: Theorising discourse, policy, and practice. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Higgins, C. (2011). The possibility of public education in an instrumentalist age. Educational Theory, 61(4), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). The active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 140–161). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Howarth, D. (2010). Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2011). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Keller, R. (2005). Analysing discourse. An approach from the sociology of knowledge. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  58. Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD). Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Knights, D. (2009). Power at work in organizations. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 144–165). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: The work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2007). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 17(2), 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lynch, K. (2014). New managerialism: The impact on education. Concept, 5(3), Article 11.Google Scholar
  66. MacBeath, J. (2007). Leadership as a subversive activity. Journal of Education Administration, 45(3), 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Maguire, M., Hoskins, K., Ball, S. J., & Braun, A. (2011). Policy discourses in school texts. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 597–609.Google Scholar
  68. Maguire, M., Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., & Braun, A. (2011). The ordinary school – What is it? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKay, J., & Garratt, D. (2013). Participation as governmentality? The effect of disciplinary technologies at the interface of service users and providers, families and the state. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 733–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Muijs, D. (2011). Leadership and organisational performance: From research to prescription? International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
  71. Oksala, J. (2013). From biopower to governmentality. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 320–336). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ozga, J. (1990). Policy research and policy theory: A comment on Fitz and Halpin. Journal of Education Policy, 5(4), 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Peter, T. (2018). Excellence: On the genealogical reconstruction of a rationality. In R. Bloch, A. Mitterle, C. Paradeise, & T. Peter (Eds.), Universities and the production of elites (pp. 33–51). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pignatelli, F. (2002). Mapping the terrain of a Foucauldian ethics: A response to the surveillance of schooling. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(2), 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Protevi, J. (2009). What does Foucault think is new about neo-liberalism? Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 21, 1–25.Google Scholar
  77. Rajagopal, I. (2014). Does the Internet shape a disciplinary society? The information-knowledge paradox. First Monday, 19(3), Article 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reynolds, D. (1998, February 20). The school effectiveness mission has only just begun. Times Educational Supplement, p. 20.Google Scholar
  79. Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rose, N. S., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rouse, J. (2006). Power/knowledge. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault (2nd ed., pp. 95–122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Savage, G. C. (2013). Governmentality in practice: Governing the self and others in a marketized education system. In D. Gillies (Ed.), Educational leadership and Michel Foucault (pp. 85–105). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  83. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). Our ‘will to learn’ and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning: Governing the subject (pp. 48–60). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Slater, G. B., & Griggs, C. B. (2015). Standardization and subjection: An autonomist critique of neoliberal school reform. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 37(5), 438–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2012). Sculpting a ‘social space’ for re-engaging disengaged ‘disadvantaged’ young people with learning. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 44(3), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smyth, J., & Shacklock, G. (2003). Re-making teaching ideology, policy, and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stickney, J. (2013). Judging teachers: Foucault, governance and agency during education reforms. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 649–662.Google Scholar
  89. Styhre, A. (2001). Kaizen, ethics, and care of the operations: Management after empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 795–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tamboukou, M. (2003). Genealogy/ethnography: Finding the rhythm. In M. Tamboukou (Ed.), Dangerous encounters: Genealogy and ethnography (pp. 195–216). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  91. Thomas, R. (2009). Critical management studies on identity: Mapping the terrain. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 166–185). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thomas, S., & Watson, L. (2011). Quality and accountability: Policy tensions for Australian school leaders. In International handbook of leadership for learning (Vol. 25, pp. 189–208). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thomson, P. (2001). How principals lose ‘face’: A disciplinary tale of educational administration and modern managerialism. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 22(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  94. Thomson, P. (2004). Severed heads and compliant bodies? A speculation about principal identities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  95. Thomson, P., Lingard, B., & Wrigley, T. (2012). Ideas for changing educational systems, educational policy and schools. Critical Studies in Education, 53(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thrupp, M., & Willmott, R. (2003). Educational management in managerialist times. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  97. Townsend, T. (2007). 20 years of ICSEI: The impact of school effectiveness and school improvement on school reform. In T. Townsend & B. Avalos (Eds.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Walkerdine, V., & Bansel, P. (2010). Neoliberalism, work and subjectivity: Towards a more complex account. In M. Wetherell & C. T. Mohanty (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 492–508). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wallenstein, S. (2013). Introduction: Foucault, biopolitics, and governmentality. In J. Nilsson & S. Wallenstein (Eds.), Foucault, biopolitics, and governmentality. Södertörns högskola: Stockholm.Google Scholar
  100. Webb, P. T. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(3), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Webb, P. T., Gulson, K., & Pitton, V. (2014). The neo-liberal education policies of epimeleia heautou: Caring for the self in school markets. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  102. Willmott, R. (1999). School effectiveness research: An ideological commitment? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(2), 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wright, N. (2001). Leadership,‘bastard leadership’and managerialism: Confronting twin paradoxes in the Blair education project. Educational Management & Administration, 29(3), 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Youdell, D. (2006). Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities (Vol. 3). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  105. Zipin, L., Sellar, S., & Hattam, R. (2012). Countering and exceeding ‘capital’: A ‘funds of knowledge’approach to re-imagining community. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(2), 179–192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Dolan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations