Advertisement

Open Educational Resources in South Africa

  • Tony MaysEmail author
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

Open and distance learning has been long-established in South Africa and continues to grow. There is also growing interest and examples of online learning, which may or may not be offered by distance education providers. Learning resources are central to both forms of provision and so it seems logical that there should be extensive interest in working with Open Educational Resources (OER). However, while South Africa has been active in the OER arena, and while there are a variety of innovative examples of OER development and use, it would be true to say that engagement with OER is not yet a mainstream practice. This chapter explores some of the examples of OER use and identifies a number of supporting and inhibiting factors.

Keywords

OER Open and distance and e-learning (ODeL) South Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

If you wish to acknowledge persons who contributed or sponsoring agencies, do so here in this optional section.

References

  1. African National Congress. (1994). A policy framework for education and training. Johannesburg: ANC Education Desk.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  3. Arinto, P. B., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., King, T., Cartmill, T., & Willmers, M. (2017). Research on open educational resources for development in the Global South: Project landscape. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 3–26). Cape Town and Ottawa: African Minds, International Development Research Centre, Research on Open Educational Resources for Development.Google Scholar
  4. Baijnath, N. (2014). Curricular innovation and digitisation at a mega university in the developing world—The UNISA ‘signature course’ project. Journal of Learning for Development (JL4D), 1(1).Google Scholar
  5. Bangura, A. K. (2005). Ubuntugogy: An Africa educational paradigm that transcends pedagogy, andragogy, ergonagy and heautagogy. Journal of Third World Studies, xx11(2), 13–54.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow-Zambodla, A., & Ferreira, F. (2012). Good practice in community engagement: A case study of household food security in Eastern Cape. Retrieved from https://www.nadeosa.org.za/documents/HFS.pdf.
  7. Chae, B., & Jenkins, M. (2015). A qualitative investigation of faculty Open Educational Resource usage in the Washington Community and Technical College System: Models for support and implementation. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/FINAL_OER_USE_WA_CTC.
  8. Christie, P. (2008). Changing schools in South Africa: Opening the doors of learning. Sandton: Heinemann Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Coetzee, P. H., & Roux, A. P. J. (Eds.). (2002). Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings (2nd ed.). Southern Africa: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Commonwealth of Learning. (2005). Creating learning materials for open and distance learning: A handbook for authors and instructional designers. Retrieved from https://www.col.org/resources/creating-learning-materials-open-and-distance-learning-handbook-authors-instructional.
  11. Cooney, C. (2017). What impacts do OER have on students? Students share their experiences with a health psychology OER at New York City College of Technology. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 18(4), 155–178.Google Scholar
  12. Council on Higher Education. (2014). Distance higher education programmes in a digital era: Good practice guide. Pretoria: CHE.Google Scholar
  13. Council on Higher Education. (2016). South African higher education reviewed: Two decades of democracy. Pretoria: CHE.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). Factors shaping lecturers’ adoption of OER at three South African universities. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 287–348). Cape Town & Ottawa: African Minds, International Development Research Centre, Research on Open Educational Resources for Development.Google Scholar
  15. De Hart, K., Chetty, Y., & Archer, E. (2015). Uptake of OER by staff in distance education in South Africa. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 16(2), 18–45.Google Scholar
  16. Department of Education. (1994). A policy framework for education and training. Pretoria: DoE.Google Scholar
  17. Department of Education. (1995). White paper on education and training, notice 196 of 1996. Pretoria: DoE.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Higher Education and Training. (2013a). White paper for post-school education and training: Building an expanded, effective and integrated post-school system. Pretoria: DHET.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Higher Education and Training. (2013b). Concept note: Open learning in post school education and training. Pretoria: DHET.Google Scholar
  20. Department of Higher Education and Training. (2014, July 7). Policy for the provision of distance education in South African universities in the context of an integrated post-school system. Government Gazette, No. 37811, 7 July 2014. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  21. Department of Higher Education and Training. (2015). Revised policy on the minimum requirements for teacher education qualifications. Retrieved from PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  22. Department of Higher Education and Training. (2017). Open learning policy framework for post-school education and training. Pretoria: DHET.Google Scholar
  23. Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services (DTPS). (2016). National integrated ICT policy white paper. Retrieved from Pretoria. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/40325_gon1212.pdf.
  24. Department of Trade and Industry. (2016). Copyright Amendment Bill, Government Gazette No. 40121 of 5 July 2016. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  25. Department of Trade and Industry. (2017). Copyright Amendment Bill. Retrieved from https://libguides.wits.ac.za/ld.php?content_id=32174808.
  26. Desai, R. (2019, April 11). Copyright bill: Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Daily Maverick. Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2019-04-11-copyright-bill-dont-throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bath-water/.
  27. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–44.Google Scholar
  28. Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  29. Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  30. Glennie, J., Harley, K., & Butcher, N. (2012). Conclusion: Reflections on practice. In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T. Wyk (Eds.), Open educational resources and change in higher education: Reflections from practice (pp. 283–291). Vancouver: COL.Google Scholar
  31. Goodier, S. (2017). Tracking the money for open educational resources in South African basic education: What we don't know. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 233–250). Cape Town & Ottawa: African Minds, International Development Research Centre, Research on Open Educational Resources for Development.Google Scholar
  32. Gray, E., & Czerniewicz, L. (2018). Access to learning resources in post-apartheid South Africa. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Shadow libraries: Access to knowledge in global higher education (pp. 107–157). Cambridge, MA; London and England: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Grewe, K. E., & Preston Davis, W. (2017). The impact of enrollment in an OER course on student learning outcomes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 18(4), Online.Google Scholar
  34. Heleta, S. (2016). Decolonisation of higher education: Dismantling epistemic violence and Eurocentrism in South Africa. Transformation in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgs, P., & Moeketsi, R. M. H. (2011). An African perspective on academic development: The University of South Africa’s College of Human Sciences’ scholars development programme. Pretoria: Unisa.Google Scholar
  36. Higgs, P., Vakalisa, N. C. G., Mda, T. V., & Assie-Lumumba, N. (2000). African voices in education. Lansdowne: Juta & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Arinto, P. B., Cartmill, T., & King, T. (2017). Factors influencing open educational practices and OER in the Global South: Meta-synthesis of the ROER4D project. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 27–68). Cape Town & Ottawa: African Minds, International Development Research Centre, Research on Open Educational Resources for Development.Google Scholar
  38. Holborn, L. (2013). Education in South Africa: Where did it go wrong? Retrieved from https://www.ngopulse.org/article/education-south-africa-where-did-it-go-wrong.
  39. Horsthemke, K. (2006). The idea of the African university in the twenty-first century: Some reflections on Afrocentrism and Afroscepticism. South African Journal of Higher education (SAJHE), 20(4), 449–465.Google Scholar
  40. Hülsmann, T. (2016). The impact of ICT on the costs and economics of distance education: A review of the literature. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.Google Scholar
  41. Hülsmann, T., & Shabalala, L. (2016). Workload and interaction: Unisa’s signature courses—A design template for transitioning to online DE? Distance Education, 37(2), 224–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1191408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Inamorato dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., & Castaño-Muñoz, J. (2016). Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions. JRC science for policy report, EUR 27938 EN. Seville, Spain: European Union.Google Scholar
  43. Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA). (2018). 3rd report on the state of the ICT sector in South Africa. Johannesburg: ICASA.Google Scholar
  44. Kanu, I. A. (2014). The meaning and nature of African philosophy in a globalising world. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(7), 86–94.Google Scholar
  45. Kanuka, H., & Brooks, C. (2010). Distance education in a post-Fordist time: Negotiating difference. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 69–90). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. King, T. W. (2017). Postgraduate students as OER capacitators. Open Praxis, 9(2), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Le Grange, L. (2006). The changing landscape of the contemporray university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 20(4), 367–371.Google Scholar
  48. Le Grange, L. (2016). Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  49. Letseka, M. (Ed.). (2016). Open Distance Learning (ODL) through the philosophy of Ubuntu. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Luckett, K. (2011). Knowledge claims and codes of legitimation: Implications for curriculum recontextualisation in South African higher education. Africanus, 40(1), 4–18.Google Scholar
  51. Makoe, M. (2018). Avoiding to fit a square peg into a round hole: A policy framework for operationalising open distance education in dual mode universities. Distance Education, 39(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mays, T. (2014). Teaching, learning and curriculum resources. In P. du Preez & Reddy, C. (Eds.), Curriculum studies: Visions and imaginings (pp. 110–133). Cape Town: Pearson.Google Scholar
  53. Mays, T. (2016). Designing and developing programmes in open, distance and e-learning. Progressio, 38(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/1025.
  54. Mays, T. (2017). Utilising open educational resources in support of curriculum transformation at Africa Nazarene University: A participatory action research approach (DEd). Pretoria: Unisa. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10500/22619.
  55. Mehaffy, G. L. (2012). Challenge and change. Retrieved from https://online.tarleton.edu/fdi/Documents/EDUCAUSE_Mehaffy.pdf.
  56. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, CENGAGE Learning.Google Scholar
  57. Ngugi, C. (2011). OER in Africa’s higher education institutions. Distance Education, 32(2), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nsamenang, A. B., & Tchombe, T. M. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of African educational theories and practices: A generative teacher education curriculum. Bamenda, Cameroon: Human Development Resource Centre (HDRC).Google Scholar
  59. OER Africa. (2012). Policy development and review toolkit. Retrieved from https://www.oerafrica.org/policy/PolicyReviewandDevelopmentHome/tabid/914/Default.aspx.
  60. Prinsloo, P. (2017). Talkin Bout a Revolution: (Re)claiming distance education as a revolutionary, humanising praxis. Keynote address. Paper presented at the Nadeosa Conference 2017, University of the Free State, South Campus, Bloemfontein.Google Scholar
  61. Rammutloa, M. (2013). From distance learning and ODL to ODeL: Unisa library’s journey to transformation and innovation. Retrieved from https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/12043.
  62. Randell, C. (2006). Resources for new ways of learning: A manual for developers of learning resources. Johannesburg: Saide.Google Scholar
  63. Randell, C. (2015). Learning activities and feedback. Developing curriculum and learning resources: Guidelines for effective practice (pp. 33–49). Abuja, Nigeria: NCCE & TDP.Google Scholar
  64. Rumble, G. (1997). Costs and economics of open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  65. Rumble, G. (Ed.). (2004). Papers and debates on the economics and costs of distance and online learning. Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
  66. Rumble, G. (2012). Financial management of distance learning in dual-mode institutions. Open Learning, 27(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Saide. (2015). Course design guide. Retrieved from https://www.saide.org.za/design-guide/.
  68. Salem, J. A. (2016). Open pathways to student success: Academic library partnerships for open educational resource and affordable course content creation and adoption. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing out students? The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Southern African Development Community. (2012). Regional open and distance learning policy framework. Retrieved from https://www.sadc.int/files/3113/7820/8525/Approved_Regional_ODL_Policy_Framework_June_2012_1.pdf.
  71. Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Enhancing student success in ODL: Unisa’s integrated student success and support frameworks and strategies. Paper presented at the Nadeosa 2011, Johannesburg. https://www.saide.org.za/resources/Nadeosa/Conf_2011/Subotzky%20and%20Prinsloo.pptx.
  72. The World Bank. (2016). Financing higher education in Africa. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.Google Scholar
  73. United Nations Educational, S. a. C. O. U. (2004). Higher education in a globalized society (UNESCO Education Position Paper). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  74. University of South Africa. (2008). Open distance learning policy. Pretoria: Unisa.Google Scholar
  75. Visser, M., Juan, A., & Feza, N. (2015). Home and school resources as predictors of mathematics performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Welch, T., & Reed, Y. (Eds.). (2005). Designing and delivering distance education: Quality criteria and case studies from South Africa. Johannesburg: Nadeosa.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for Distance Education, Faculty of EducationUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.University of PretoriaGroenkloof, PretoriaRepublic of South Africa
  3. 3.Unit for Distance Education, Faculty of EducationUniversity of PretoriaHatfieldRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations