Advertisement

Media Science and Practice

  • Glen J. NowakEmail author
  • Michael A. Cacciatore
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Given their influence and visibility, understanding how news media cover topics involving medicines and how they provide information to their target audiences is essential when it comes to medicinal product risk communication research. While information about health and medicine are found in entertainment and social media, this chapter introduces media science with a focus, albeit not exclusively, on journalist-based news media. It presents an overview of relevant theories as well as methods that academics, government agencies, professional societies and pharmaceutical companies can use to understand communication flows in the media and their potential effects. Particularly, it reviews in more depth, the methodological aspects of content analyses as well as discusses research approaches, including those involving journalists, which could be used to guide or strengthen medicinal product risk communication. Media science-based research can inform the preparations of communication strategies and materials; and studying what is actually happening in the news media is relevant to establishing communication models and evaluating communication interventions in a rapidly changing media landscape.

References

  1. Association of Health Care Journalists (2018) Statement of principles of the Association of Health Care Journalists. https://healthjournalism.org/secondarypage-details.php?id=56. Accessed 6 July 2018
  2. Babbie E (2007) The practice of social research, 11th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahri P (2010) Public pharmacovigilance communication: a process calling for evidence-based objective driven strategies. Drug Saf 33(12):1065–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahri P, Fogd J, Morales D, Kurz X, ADVANCE Consortium (2017) Application of real-time global media monitoring and ‘derived questions’ for enhancing communication by regulatory bodies: the case of human papillomavirus vaccines. BMC Med 15:91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry DC, Michas IC, Bersellini E (2003) Communicating information about medication: the benefits of making it personal. Psychol Health 18(1):127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casciotti DM, Smith KC, Klassen AC (2014) Topics associated with conflict in print news coverage of the HPV vaccine during 2005 to 2009. Hum Vaccin Immunother 10(12):3466–3474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. duPre A (2017) Communicating about health: current issues and perspectives, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Frey LR, Botan CH, Kreps GL (2000) Investigating communication: an introduction to research methods, 2nd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham HeightsGoogle Scholar
  11. Hicks NJ, Nichols CM (2017) Health industry communication: new media, new methods, new message, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilton S, Hunt K, Langan M, Bedford H, Petticrew M (2010) Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer in the U.K. (2005–2008). Soc Sci Med 70(6):942–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinnant A, Len-Rios ME, Young R (2013) Journalistic use of exemplars to humanize health news. Journal Stud 14(4):539–554Google Scholar
  14. Hussain H, Omer SB, Manganello JA, Kromm EE et al (2011) Immunization safety in US print media. Pediatrics 127:S100–S106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  16. Larson HJ (2016) Vaccine trust and the limits of information. Science 353(6305):1207–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lattimore D, Baskin O, Heiman S, Toth E (2012) Public relations: the profession and the practice, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis I, Watson B, White KM (2016) The Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT): a conceptual framework to guide the development and evaluation of persuasive health messages. Accid Anal Prev 97:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundgren RE, McMakin AH (2013) Risk communication: a handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks, 5th edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendel-Van Alstyne JA, Nowak GJ, Aikin AL (2017) What is ‘confidence’ and what could affect it? A qualitative study of mothers who are hesitant about vaccines. Vaccine.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.007
  21. Moy P, Scheufele DA, Eveland WP, McLeod JM (2001) Support for the death penalty and rehabilitation: question order or communication effect? J Appl Soc Psychol 31(11):2230–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicols CM (2017) The communication planning process. In: Hicks NJ, Nicols CM (eds) Health industry communication: new media, new methods, new message, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, pp 53–86Google Scholar
  23. Nowak GJ, Gellin BG, NE MD, Butler R, SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (2015) Addressing vaccine hesitancy: the potential value of commercial and social marketing principles and practices. Vaccine 33:4204–4211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nowak GJ, Shen AK, Schwartz JL (2017) Using campaigns to improve perceptions of the value of adult vaccination in the United States: health communication considerations and insights. Vaccine 35:5543–5550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nyhan B, Reifler J, Richey S, Freed GL (2014) Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 133(4):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parvanta CF, Nelson DE, Harner RN (2018) Public health communication: critical tools and strategies. Jones & Bartlett Learning, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. Reyna VF (2008) A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Med Decis Mak 28(6):850–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rickard LN, McComas KA, Clarke CE, Stedman RC, Decker DJ (2013) Exploring risk attenuation and crisis communication after a plague death in Grand Canyon. J Risk Res 16(2):145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schiavo R (2014) Health communication: from theory to practice, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  30. Schinkel S, Van Weert JCM, Kester JAM, Smit EG, Schouten BC (2015) Does media use result in more active communicators? Differences between native Dutch and Turkish-Dutch patients in information-seeking behavior and participation during consultations with general practitioners. J Health Commun 20:910–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Su LY-F, Cacciatore MA, Liang X, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA (2017) Analyzing public sentiments online: a new content analysis tool combining human- and computer-based coding. Inf Commun Soc 20(3):406–427.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1182197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. US Food and Drug Administration (2011) Communicating risks and benefits: an evidence-based user’s guide. FDA, Washington, D.C. http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RiskCommunication/default.htm
  33. Viswanath K, Blake KD, Meissner HI, Saiontz NG et al (2008) Occupational practices and the making of health news: a national survey of U.S. health and medical science journalists. J Health Commun 13:759–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilcox DL, Cameron GT, Reber BH (2015) Public relations: strategies and tactics, 11th edn. Pearson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Wimmer RD, Dominick JR (2011) Mass media research: an introduction. Wadsworth, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, Grady College Center for Health and Risk CommunicationAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations