Advertisement

An Effective Machine Learning-Based File Malware Detection—A Survey

  • Ashwin A. Kumar
  • G. P. Anoosh
  • M. S. Abhishek
  • C. Shraddha
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 637)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to enable computers to learn on their own, identify malicious activities, increase scanner efficiency and sensitivity. The machine learning algorithm enables the identification of patterns in observed data, the development of models that explains the world and the prediction of things without explicitly preprogrammed rules and models. There have been huge research interests in the cybersecurity industry as well as in universities in the subjects of how to effectively block malicious documentation without a sign of slowing down. The main aim of the paper is to investigate the efficiency of large files and increase sensitivity in malware detection.

Keywords

Malware Machine learning Scanner Vulnerabilities 

References

  1. 1.
    Mukkamala, S., Sung, A., Abraham, A.: Cyber security challenges: designing efficient intrusion detection systems and antivirus tools. Enhancing Comput. Secur. Smart Technol. 125–163 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, J., Rabaiotti, J.: The PDF exploit: same crime, different face. https://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/pdf-exploit-same-crime-different-face/. Last accessed 18 March 2018
  3. 3.
    Tzermias, Z., Sykiotakis, G., Polychronakis, M., Markatos, E.P.: Combining static and dynamic analysis for the detection of malicious documents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on System Security. EUROSEC’11, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ratanaworabhan, P., Livshits, B., Zorn, B.: NOZZLE: a defense against heap spraying code injection attacks. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium. SSYM’09. Berkeley, CA USA (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Willems, G., Holz, T., Freiling, F.: Toward automated dynamic malware analysis using CWSandbox. IEEE Secur. Priv. 5, 32–39 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, F.X.: Phenoelit: attacking networked embedded devices. Presented in Black Hat USA 2002. http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-02/bh-us02-phenoelit-network.pdf. Last accessed 18 March 2018
  7. 7.
    Adrian, C.: Hacking network printers. http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=security/networkprinterhacking. Last accessed 18 March 2018 (2017)
  8. 8.
    Sibert, W.O.: Malicious data and computer security. In: Proceedings of the 19th National Information Systems Security Conference (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muller, J., Mladenov, V., Somorovsky, J., Schwenk, J.: SoK: exploiting network printers. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 213–230 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cui, A., Costello, M., Stolfo, S.J.: When firmware modifications attack: a case study of embedded exploitation. Ndss (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, J.: MLPdf: an effective machine learning based approach for PDF malware detection, pp. 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, X., Li, C., Wang, D., Wen, S., Zhang, J., Nepal, S., Xiang, Y., Ren, K.: Android HIV: a study of repackaging malware for evading machine-learning detection (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hecht, A., Sagi, A.: PIDS: a behavioral framework for analysis and detection of network printer attacks, pp. 1–20 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Hou, D., Liu, Y., Zha, H., Yu, N.: Detection based defense against adversarial examples from the steganalysis point to view (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clements, J., Lao, Y.: Hardware trojan attacks on neural networks (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sohi, S.M., Ganji, F., Seifert, J.-P.: Recurrent neural networks for enhancement of signature-based network intrusion detection systems (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alkasassbeh, M., Almseidin, M.: Machine learning methods for network intrusion detection and intrusion prevention systems. Pro. Quest Diss. Theses. 106 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, J., Su, H.: Machine learning attack and defense on voltage over-scaling-based lightweight authentication, pp. 1–12 (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cai, H.: a preliminary study on the sustainability of android malware detection. arXiv Comput. Sci. (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashwin A. Kumar
    • 1
  • G. P. Anoosh
    • 1
  • M. S. Abhishek
    • 1
  • C. Shraddha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringVidyavardhaka College of EngineeringMysuruIndia

Personalised recommendations