The Accessibility of Global Mobility for Disabled Students

  • Armineh SoorenianEmail author


As the Western world continues to grapple with the political consequences of Brexit and the rise of right-wing, anti-globalisation politicians such as Donald Trump, creating extreme ideologies that threaten to limit individual and collective freedoms of people to study across borders, there has never been a more urgent time for Western universities to consider how they shape the experience of international students. Especially for disabled international students, the opportunity to spend an extended time residing and studying a wide range of courses in a different country is a valuable life experience. Yet, in the current political and social climate, students who have a greater set of disability or impairment-related needs but have access to limited support are generally overlooked in the university sector, more than they are in auspicious times. This chapter examined and documented the intersectional experiences of a group of 30 disabled international students in British universities. The focus of the project was the interaction of disabled international students’ multiple identities, addressing questions such as which barriers are encountered by disabled international students’ based on one of their single identities, and which other obstacles are grounded in the multiplicity of their identities. The research demonstrated that disabled international students face many of the same barriers as their disabled domestic peers and non-disabled international counterparts as well as some unique difficulties specific to disabled international students. The chapter will specifically focus on social experiences of this group of students in their university environment.


Disabled international students University social activities Intersectionality Barriers Inclusion 


  1. Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling imagery and the media: An exploration of the principles for media representations of disabled people. Derby: The British Council of Disabled People.Google Scholar
  2. Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conway, M., & McDow, M. (2010). Cultural diversity: Teaching all students, reaching all learners, presentation slides from the center on sisability studies. University of Hawai‘i at Manoa. Retrieved November 14, 2016, from
  4. Devine, M. A., & Lashua, B. (2002). Constructing social acceptance in inclusive leisure contexts: The role of individuals with disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 36(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
  5. Directgov. (2018). Disabled students’ allowances. Retrieved November 28, 2018, from
  6. ECU Equality Challenge Unit. (2012). Attracting international students: Equitable services and support, campus cohesion and community engagement. Retrieved December 22, 2017, from
  7. Graf, L. (2009). Applying the varieties of capitalism approach to higher education: Comparing the internationalisation of German and British universities. European Journal of Education, 44(4), 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham, L. (2012). Socialising through exercise perhaps is a gift from heaven: The relevance of a sport and recreation service to the needs of international students. International Journal of Sport & Society, 3(2), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, N., & Peacock, N. (2009). It’s so much easier to go with what’s easy: Mindfulness’ and the discourse between home and international students in the UK. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(4), 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasler, F. (2003). Philosophy of independent living. Retrieved July 12, 2010, from
  11. HESA Higher education Statistics Agency. (2017). Staff record [from 1994 onwards]. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from
  12. Holden, C., & Beresford, P. (2002). Globalization and disability. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Howard, D., & Young, M. (2002). Leisure: a pathway to love and intimacy. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(4), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO International Students office. (2018). Retrieved November 30, 2018, from
  15. Jones, F., & Bright, J. (2001). Stress: Myth, theory and research. New York: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. King, A. (undated). Experiences of twelve students with physical disabilities who were attending our colleges or third level education in the Republic of Ireland. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Trinity College, Dublin.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, S. (2011). Disability studies and the language of physical education curriculum. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(2), unpaged. Retrieved July 15, 2014, from
  18. Lomer, S. (2018). UK policy discourses and international student mobility: the deterrence and subjectification of international students. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(3), 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLean, P., Heagney, H., & Gardner, K. (2003). Going Global: The implications for students with a disability. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(2), 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Madriaga, M., Hanson, K., Heaton, C., Kay, H., Newitt, S., & Walker, A. (2010). Confronting similar challenges? disabled and non-disabled students’ learning and assessment experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray, P. (2002). Hello! Are you listening? Disabled teenagers’ experience of access to inclusive leisure. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved June 21, 2010, from!+Are+you+listening.
  22. Murray, P. (2004). Making connections: Developing inclusive leisure in policy and practice. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved June 21, 2010, from
  23. NUS National Union of Students. (2008). Student Experience Report. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from
  24. Philo, G., Briant, E., & Donald, P. (2013). Bad news for refugees. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  25. Pringle, G., Fischbacher, M. & Williams, A. (2008). Assisting international students to manage their transition to UK academic culture. Paper presented at U21 ‘Teaching and Learning’ conference: Does teaching and learning translate? University of Glasgow, UK. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from
  26. Robson, S. (2011). Internationalization: a transformative agenda for higher education? Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 17(6), 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudd, A. (2016). Conference speech. In conservative party conference. Manchester: Conservative Party.Google Scholar
  28. Sachs, D., & Schreuer, N. (2011). Inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: Performance and participation in student’s experiences. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(2), unpaged. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from
  29. Sawir, E., Marginson, S., Deumert, A., Nyland, C., & Ramia, G. (2008). Loneliness and international students: An Australian study. Journal of studies in international education, 12(2), 148–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soorenian, A. (2013). Disabled international students in British higher education: experiences and expectations. Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. SUs Students Unions. (2018). Retrieved November 29, 2018, from
  32. Thomas, L. (2003). Seeking and negotiating academic support in higher education: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of students with mental health problems. MA Thesis, University of Leeds. Available at:
  33. Vasey, S. (2004). Disability culture: The story so far. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barriers—enabling environments. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations