Advertisement

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness: Examining the Role of Personal and Country-Level Freedom in Well-Being

  • Sook Ning ChuaEmail author
  • Sefa Awaworyi Churchill
  • Richard Koestner
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors present a much-needed quantitative study that examines the individual and interactive effects of individual freedom and national freedom on well-being among the elderly. The study analyzes cross-country data from World Values Survey and Freedom House. The result shows that personal freedom does not benefit well-being in a country that is not free. The authors demonstrate that it is possible to experience individual freedom in an unfree country, or conversely, to lack personal freedom in a free country. The authors further highlight the importance of ensuring the political and civil liberties of nations to promote happiness even if one has secured personal freedom.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98, 808–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angner, E. (2010). Subjective well-being. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Stability and change in the Freedom House political rights and civil liberties measures. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Mishra, V. (2016). Trust, social networks and subjective wellbeing in China. Social Indicators Research, 132, 313–339.Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A. (1990). Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Collopy, B. J. (1988). Autonomy in long term care: Some crucial distinctions. The Gerontologist, 28(Suppl), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collopy, B., Dubler, N., Zuckerman, C., Crigger, B. J., & Campbell, C. S. (1990). Special supplement: The ethics of home care—Autonomy and accommodation. The Hastings Center Report, 20, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creed, P. A., & Klisch, J. (2005). Future outlook and financial strain: Testing the personal agency and latent deprivation models of unemployment and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeCharms, R. C. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (2009). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. In Culture and well-being (pp. 43–70). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downie, M., Koestner, R., & Chua, S. N. (2007). Political support for self-determination, wealth, and national subjective well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geeraert, N., Li, R., Ward, C., Gelfand, M., & Demes, K. A. (2019). A tight spot: How personality moderates the impact of social norms on sojourner adaptation. Psychological Science, 30, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., … & Aycan, Z. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.Google Scholar
  19. Heckhausen, J. (1997). Developmental regulation across adulthood: Primary and secondary control of age-related challenges. Developmental Psychology, 33, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2011). Trust and well-being. Journal of Wellbeing, 1, 42–78.Google Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasser, V. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 935–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lachman, M. E., & Leff, R. (1989). Perceived control and intellectual functioning in the elderly: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 25, 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau, S., Hiemisch, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). The experience of freedom in decisions–Questioning philosophical beliefs in favor of psychological determinants. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1024–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, E., Rosenberg, M. W., & Fitzgibbon, S. H. (1999). Activity limitation and chronic conditions in Canada’s elderly, 1986–2011. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Connor, B. P., & Vallerand, R. J. (1994). Motivation, self-determination, and person environment fit as predictors of psychological adjustment among nursing home residents. Psychology and Aging, 9, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Portela, M., Neira, I., & del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114, 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodin, J. (1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233, 1271–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Royall, D. R., Palmer, R., Chiodo, L. K., & Polk, M. J. (2004). Declining executive control in normal aging predicts change in functional status: The Freedom House Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, R. A. P., Woodward, N. J., Wallston, B. S., Wallston, K. A., Rye, P., & Zylstra, M. (1988). Health care implications of desire and expectancy for control in elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, P1–P7.Google Scholar
  36. Thomasma, D. C. (1984). Freedom, dependency, and the care of the very old. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 32, 906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations. (2008). The Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing: Guiding framework and toolkit for practitioners and policy makers. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations. (2017). World population ageing 2017—Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/397). New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 257–288). Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Verme, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom and control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2010). Agency, values, and well-being: A human development model. Social Indicators Research, 97, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Westcott, M. R. (1992). The discursive expression of human freedom. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkie, R., Peat, G., Thomas, E., & Croft, P. (2007). Factors associated with participation restriction in community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and over. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sook Ning Chua
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sefa Awaworyi Churchill
    • 2
  • Richard Koestner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychological ScienceNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.School of Economics, Finance & MarketingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations