Advertisement

Textual Patterns of the Eight-Part Essays

  • Chunlan JinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

As discussed in previous chapters, traditional Chinese rhetoric and logic or the mode of argumentations were divergent inherently for its growing cultural and historical soils. It’s advisable to attach serious study to Chinese rhetoric and logic for the only existing non-Indo-European culture that preserves extensive archives for thousands of years.

References

  1. Elman, B. A. (1999). Classical reasoning in late imperial chinese civil examination essays. Journal of Humanities East/West, 20, 21, 361–420.Google Scholar
  2. Elman, B. A. (2009). Eight-legged essay. Berkshire encyclopedia of China (pp. 695). Berkshire Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Fu, H. (2017). From complete works of Zhu Xi and its inheritance (P. Wenguo, Annotated and Trans., pp. 181–182). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gong, Y., & Gao, M. (2007). Evaluative standard for the eight-legged essay in the imperial examinations of the Qing Dynasty. Frontiers of Literary Studies in China, 1(4), 610–631.Google Scholar
  5. Harbsmeier, C. (Ed.). (1998). Language and logic (Vol. 7). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Needham, J. (1956a). The neo-confucians. In Needham 1956c (pp. 455–95).Google Scholar
  7. Needham, J. (1956b). Chu Hsi, Leibniz, and the philosophy of organism. In Need ham 1956c (pp. 496–505).Google Scholar
  8. Needham, J. (Eds.). (1956c). History of scientific thought, volume 2 of science and civilization in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. The Cambridge history of Chinese literature: From 1375 (2010). In K. S. Chang & S. Owen (Eds.) (p. 25). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations