Advertisement

InECCE2019 pp 691-703 | Cite as

Direct Power Control Method of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Algorithm for Pico-Hydrokinetic River Energy Conversion System

  • W. I. IbrahimEmail author
  • M. R. Mohamed
  • R. M. T. R. Ismail
Conference paper
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 632)

Abstract

In this paper, a design of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for the pico-hydrokinetic system in river application has been proposed. The design topology consists of the permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG), a three-phase bridge rectifier and a DC boost converter. The proposed MPPT algorithm is a combination of modified hill-climbing search algorithm (MHCS) with the current PI-controller. The MPPT concept is based on measuring the rectifier output voltage and current respectively to produce the reference current (IMPP). The PI-controller has been used to tune the error signal between IMPP and actual inductance current (Idc) to provide the duty-cycle of the boost converter. A comparison is performed between the fixed step HCS and the proposed MPPT to investigate the performance of the algorithm. The results show the proposed algorithm able to harness the maximum power with 96.32% efficiency.

Keywords

MPPT Hill climbing search algorithm Hydrokinetic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank to Universiti Malaysia Pahang for funding support under UMP Postgraduate Research Scheme (PGRS190318).

References

  1. 1.
    Yazici İ, Yaylaci EK (2017) Maximum power point tracking for the permanent magnet synchronous generator-based WECS by using the discrete-time integral sliding mode controller with a chattering-free reaching law. IET Power Electron 1751–1758Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alvarez Alvarez E, Rico-Secades M, Corominas EL, Huerta-Medina N, Soler Guitart J (2018) Design and control strategies for a modular hydroKinetic smart grid. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 95:137–145Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yuce MI, Muratoglu A (2015) Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems: a technology status review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koko SP, Kusakana K, Vermaak HJ (2017) Optimal energy management of a grid-connected micro-hydrokinetic with pumped hydro storage system. J Energy Storage 14:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar D, Chatterjee K (2016) A review of conventional and advanced MPPT algorithms for wind energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:957–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganjefar S, Ghassemi AA, Ahmadi MM (2014) Improving efficiency of two-type maximum power point tracking methods of tip-speed ratio and optimum torque in wind turbine system using a quantum neural network. Energy 67:444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalala ZM, Zahid ZU, Yu W, Cho Y, Lai JS (2013) Design and analysis of an MPPT technique for small-scale wind energy conversion systems. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 28(3):756–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raza Kazmi SM, Goto H, Guo HJ, Ichinokura O (2011) A novel algorithm for fast and efficient speed-sensorless maximum power point tracking in wind energy conversion systems. Ind Electron IEEE Trans 58(1):29–36Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mousa HHH, Youssef A, Mohamed EEM (2019) Electrical power and energy systems variable step size P & O MPPT algorithm for optimal power extraction of multi-phase PMSG based wind generation system. Electr Power Energy Syst 108(2018):218–231Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong CM, Chen CH, Tu CS (2013) Maximum power point tracking-based control algorithm for PMSG wind generation system without mechanical sensors. Energy Convers Manag 69:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdullah MA, Al-Hadhrami T, Tan CW, Yatim AHM (2018) Towards green energy for smart cities: particle swarm optimization based MPPT approach. IEEE Access 6:1–1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar K, Babu RN, Prabhu KR (2017) Design and analysis of RBFN-based single MPPT controller for hybrid solar and wind energy system. IEEE Access 5:15308–15317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li S, Wang H, Tian Y, Aitouche A (2015) A RBF neural network based MPPT method for variable speed wind turbine system. IFAC-PapersOnLine 28(21):244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messalti S, Harrag A, Loukriz A (2017) A new variable step size neural networks MPPT controller: review, simulation and hardware implementation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68(2015):221–233Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tiwari R, Babu NR (2016) Fuzzy logic based MPPT for permanent magnet synchronous generator in wind energy conversion system. Int Fed Autom Control 49(1):462–467Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xia Y, Ahmed KH, Williams BW (2011) A new maximum power point tracking technique for permanent magnet synchronous generator based wind energy conversion system. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(12):3609–3620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hussain J (2016) Adaptive maximum power point tracking control algorithm for wind energy conversion systems. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 31(2):697–705Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Licari J, Zammit D, Staines CS, Micallef A, Maurice A (2017) Incremental current based MPPT for a PMSG micro wind turbine in a grid-connected DC microgrid. Energy Procedia 142:2284–2294Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdullah MA, Yatim AHM, Tan CW, Saidur R (2012) A review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for wind energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):3220–3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Energy & Power Electronics Research Group, Faculty of Electrical & Electronics EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia PahangPekanMalaysia
  2. 2.Instrumentation & Control Engineering (ICE), Faculty of Electrical & Electronics EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia PahangPekanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations