InECCE2019 pp 495-503 | Cite as

Intelligent Autism Screening Using Fuzzy Agent

  • Nurul Najihah Che Razali
  • Ngahzaifa Ab. GhaniEmail author
  • Syifak Izhar Hisham
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 632)


In the diagnosis of diseases, either physical or psychological, there are situations causing reaching for second independent opinion very hard. This is especially true in the diagnosis of Autism due to the complex process of diagnosis. Apart from the complex process, the challenges include cost and the availability of experts. This, however, does not change the fact that having regular independent second opinions is crucial. Hence, this study proposes an intelligent autism screening model using fuzzy agent, to assist the expert and non-expert in making the diagnosis. In this study, the fuzzy inputs are assigned based on five categories, which are Communication, Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Problem Solving, and Personal Social, and is specifically for three-year-old children only. The proposed model will be able to produce output in the form of sequences based on lowest to highest mark of the scores for each category. This output will then relate to the suggestion of activities to autistic children by priority (based on the scores obtained).


Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Agent-Based Fuzzy agent Autistic children Symptoms 


  1. 1.
    Filipek PA, Accardo PJ, Ashwal S, Baranek GT, Otr L, Cook EH, Volkmar FR (2000) Practice parameter: screening and diagnosis of autism report of the quality standards subcommittee of the american academy of neurology and the child neurology society 1–14Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tennyson MF, Kuester DA, Casteel J, Nikolopoulos C (2016) Accessible robots for improving social skills of individuals with autism as an intervention for individuals. J Artif Intell Soft Comput Res 6(4):267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahuja R, Kaur D (2014) Neuro-fuzzy methodology for diagnosis of autism 5(2):2171–2172Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    El Alami M, Tahiri N, De Arriaga F (2017) DIAUTIS: a fuzzy and affective multi-agent platform for the diagnosis of autism. Br J Appl Sci Technol 21(4):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hieu NV, Hien NLH (2018) Artificial neural network and fuzzy logic approach to diagnose autism spectrum disorder, Int Res J Eng Technol 5(6)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puerto E, Aguilar J, Lopez C, Chavez D (2019) Using multilayer fuzzy cognitive maps to diagnose autism spectrum disorder. Appl Soft Comput J 75:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pratap A, Kanimozhi CS, Pramod KV, Vijayakumar R (2014) Functional fuzzy based autism assessment support system. Int J Eng Technol 6(5):2105–2114Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Souza PVDC, Gumaraes AJ (2018) Using fuzzy neural networks for improving the prediction of children with autism through mobile devices. In: IEEE Symposium on computers and communications (ISCC), pp 1086–1089Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharma A, Khosla A, Khosla M, Rao Y (2018) Fast and accurate diagnosis of autism (FADA): a novel hierarchical fuzzy system based autism detection tool. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41:757–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thabtah F (2019) Machine learning in autistic spectrum disorder behavioral research: a reviews and ways forward. Informatics for Health and Social Care 44(3): 278–297Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bi XA, Liu YC, Jiang Q, Shu Q, Sun Q, Dai JH (2018) The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder based on the random neural network cluster. Front Hum Neurosci (12):257Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thabtah F, Peebles D (2019) A new machine learning model based on induction of rules for autism detection, Health Inform J, p 1–23Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tariq Q, Daniels J, Schwartz JN, Washington P, Kalantarian H, Wall DP (2018) Mobile detection of autism through machine learning on home video: a development and prospective validation study. PLoS Med 15(11)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gray PH (2017) M-CHAT autism screening may be inaccurate among toddlers born very preterm. J Pediatr 182:401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Vaan G, Vervloed MPJ, Den Boom MH-D, Antonissen A, Knoors H, Verhoeven L (2016) A critical review of screening and diagnostic instruments for autism spectrum disorders in people with sensory impairments in addition to intellectual disabilities. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil 9(1–2):36–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robins D, Dumont-Mathieu T (2006) Early screening for autism spectrum disorders: update on the modified checklist for autism in toddlers and other measures. J Dev Behav Pediatr JDBP 27(2 Suppl):S111–S119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wall D, Kosmicki J, DeLuca T, Harstad E, Fusaro V (2012a) Use of machine learning to shorten observation-based screening and diagnosis of autism, Tradit Psychiatry 2(4)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wall D, Dally R, Luyster R, Jund J, Deluca T (2012b) Use of artificial intelligence to shorten behavioural diagnosis of autism. Plos One 7(8)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al-diabat M (2018) Fuzzy data mining for autism classification of children. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 9(7):11–17Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fougères AJ (2013) A modelling approach based on fuzzy agents., pp 10
  21. 21.
    Jennings NR (2000) On agent-based software engineering 6, 117(September 1999):277–296Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ostrosi E, Fougères AJ (2011) Optimization of product configuration assisted by fuzzy agents. Int J Interact Des Manuf 5(1):29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nurul Najihah Che Razali
    • 1
  • Ngahzaifa Ab. Ghani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Syifak Izhar Hisham
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Systems & Software Engineering (FSKKP)Universiti Malaysia PahangKuantanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations