Advertisement

A Review on Interference Management in Millimeter-Wave MIMO Systems for Future 5G Networks

  • E. UdayakumarEmail author
  • V. Krishnaveni
Conference paper
  • 16 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 626)

Abstract

Millimeter-wave (mm-wave) communication systems provide data rates in gigabits-per-second, due to large bandwidth availability used or 5G applications. Where the absorption and path loss are high in mm waves, it introduces poor propagation of sending the information. The shadowing can affect the millimeter wave to travel at long distances. Because of the high attenuation, the receiver provides low SNR value. Due to the oscillators, it causes a high interference. The interference occurred in mm wave such as inter-carrier interference, inter-block interference, phase noise, IQTM, etc. The various techniques are implemented at transmitter and receiver side to reduce the interferences. These waves are called a shorter wavelength wave, also has need to use a more number of antenna elements. Anyway, this mm-wave system has more spectral efficiency which was used for reducing the traffic demands. To overcome these problems, the beamforming was used with MIMO technology. This survey shows the effect of various interference and the cancelation techniques in downlink communications.

Keywords

IQ imbalance Phase noise PAPR Zero forcing Beamforming 

References

  1. 1.
    G. Zhu, K. Huang, V.K.N. Lau, B. Xia, X. Li, S. Zhang, Hybrid interference cancellation in millimeter-wave MIMO systems, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS), pp. 1–6 (Shenzhen, 2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.U. Dayakumar, V. Krishnaveni, Analysing of various interference in Mmwave comm system: a survey, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conf on Computing, Comm & Networking Technology (ICCCNT ‘19), pp. 1–6 (Kanpur, 2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Wu, T. Chang, Interference reduction of MmWave technology of 5G-based green Comm. IEEE Access 4, 10228–10234 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Zhu, K. Huang, V.K.N. Lau, B. Xia, X. Li, S. Zhang, Beamforming the Kronecker decomposition of interference cancel in the analog domain, in 2017 Global Communication Conference, pp. 1–6 (Singapore, 2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Yang, M. Xiao, Performance analysis of MMwave relaying, beamwidth and self-interference. IEEE Trans. Comm. 66(2), 589–600 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Niknam, B. Natarajan, R. Barazideh, Interference analysis for finite-area 5G millimeter-wave net consider block effect. IEEE Access 6, 23470–23479 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Wang, C. Qin, Y. Yao, Y. Li, Low complex interference alignment for millimeter wave MIMO channels in 3-cell mobile net. J. Areas Comm 35(7), 1513–1523 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Maltsev et al., Performance of interference mitigation in the overlaying Millimeter Wave small cell net, in IEEE Conference on Communications and Networking (CSCN), pp. 130–136 (Tokyo, 2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Modiano et al., Interference model index and applications to MMwave networks. IEEE Access on Wireless Comm 17, 71–85 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Hu, Channel estimation for interference mitigation in millimeter-wave multi-cell beamspace MIMO systems. J. Comm and Netw. 19(4), 371–383 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Gao, Decorrelating receiver of interference mitigation in MMwave small cells networks. IEEE Access. 6, 7772–7779 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Wang, R. Song, S. Leung, Removal of ICI & IBI of wireless heterogeneous net. Timing Mismatch. IEEE Comm. Letters. 21(5), 1195–1198 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Wang, S. Leung, R. Song, Analysing of the uplink IBI & ICI in heterogeneous net with multiple macrocells. IEEE Comm Lett. 21, 212–215 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Yu, H. Sun, X.-W. Zhu, W. Hong, A. Zhu, A channel sideband distortion model to suppress Q-band mMwave TX, in 2016 MTT-S Microwave Symposium, pp. 1–3 (San Francisco, CA, 2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Khansefid, H. Minn, Q. Zhan, et al., Waveform design and comparisons for MmWave Massive MIMO system to RF distortions, in 2016 Globecom workshops, pp. 1–6 (Washington, DC, 2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Chen et al., Influence of white local oscillator noise on wideband Comm. IEEE Microw. Theory & Tech. 66(7), 3349–3359 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Al-Dhahir et al., Reduced complex joint compensate phase noise & IQ imbalance of MIMO-OFDM systems. Trans. Wirel. Comm. 9(11), 3450–3460 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Svensson, T. et al., A Beamforming MIMO system in the phase noises at Mmwave frequencies, in 2017 Conference on Wireless Communication & Networking Workshops (WCNCW), pp. 1–6 (San Francisco, CA, 2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Minn, H. Huang, In phase and quadrature mismatch estimation and compensation of MmWave comm system. Trans. Wirel. Comm. 16(7), 4317–4331 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Wu, Y. Li, M. Zhao, Estimation of transmitter IQ imbalance at the receiver with receiver IQ imbalance & carrier offset of OFDM systems, in 2014 Globecom Workshops, pp. 960–965 (Austin 2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Chung, M. Ben Rejeb, Y. Beltagy, A.M. Darwish, H.A. Hung, S. Boumaiza, IQ imbalance & digital predistortions of Mmwave TX using reduced sample rate observations. Trans. Microw. Theory & Tech. 66(7), 3433–3442 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Udayakumar, P. Vetrivelan, PAPR Reduction of OQAM-OFDM Signals using neural network. Int. J. Appl. Engg Res. (RI Publications) 10(41), 30292–30297 (2015) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Udayakumar, P. Vetrivelan, PAPR reduction of OQAM-OFDM signal using optimized clipping and filter technique, in 2015 International Conference on Soft-computing & Network Security, pp. 1–6 (Coimbatore, 2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Z. Guo, Y. Yılmaz, X. Wang, TX centric channel estimation & low PAPR Precode for Mmwave MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Comm. 64, 2925–2938 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K.M. Mora Navarro, E. Costa Interference between millimeter wave radio links due to rain scatter, in 2016 Radio and Science Meeting, pp. 115–116 (Fajardo, 2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A.H. Jafari, J. Park, R.W. Heath, Analysis of interference mitigation in mmWave communications, in 2017 International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6 (Paris, 2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Liuv et al., Multiple-beam selection with limit F/b of hybrid beamforming for massive MIMO systems. IEEE Access. 5, 13327–13335 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Wang, J. Bian, J. Sun, W. Zhang, M. Zhang, A survey of 5G channel measurements and models. Comm Surv. Tutor. 20, 3142–3168 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Kutty, D. Sen, Beamforming for mmWave comm: an inclusive survey. Comm Surv. Tutorials. 18, 949–973 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECEKIT-Kalaignarkarunanidhi Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECEPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations