Advertisement

Analyzing the settlement of adjacent buildings with shallow foundation based on the horizontal displacement of retaining wall

  • Quoc Thien HuynhEmail author
  • Van Qui Lai
  • Viet Thai Tran
  • Minh Tam Nguyen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 62)

Abstract

This paper concentrated on analysing the settlement of adjacent buildings with shallow foundation (Uy) based on the maximum horizontal displacement of retaining wall (δmax). The Finite element method (FEM) with Hardening Soil model (HSM) were employed to predict the horizontal displacement of retaining wall and the settlement of adjacent buildings of 7 projects having deep excavation in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC). Following the comparisons among the results of modeling and field measurements, a close correlation between δmax/H and Uy was proposed in term of δmax/H = -αUy, in which α was unit coefficient varying according to excavation depth, H was the excavation depth. Besides, based on allowable and limited settlement values for adjacent buildings, the allowable values of δmax were also proposed. Furthermore, to confirm the proposed results, another case of deep excavation in Hanoi City was selected for application.

Keywords

deep excavation adjacent buildings Ho Chi Minh City 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eurocode 7 (EN 1997-1): Geotechnical design – Part 1 (1997): General rules.Google Scholar
  2. Hsiung, B.C.B. (2009). A case study on the behaviour of a deep excavation in sand. Computers and Geotechnics, pp 665–675.Google Scholar
  3. Hung, N.K., and Phienwej, N. (2016). Practice and experience in deep excavations in soft soil of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(6), pp 2221–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. IS: 1904 – 1966, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)Google Scholar
  5. Lim, A., Ou, C.Y., and Hsieh, P.G. (2010). Evaluation of clay constitutive models for analysis of deep excavation under undrained conditions. Journal of GeoEngineering, 5(1), pp 9–20.Google Scholar
  6. Lin, H.D., Mendy, S., Liao, H.C., Dang, P.H., Hsieh, Y.M., and Chen, C.C. (2016). Responses of 3D excavation and adjacent buildings in sagging and hogging Zones using Decoupled Analysis Method. Journal of GeoEngineering, pp 85–96.Google Scholar
  7. Ou, C.Y., Shiau, B.Y., and Wang, I.W. (2000). Three-dimensional deformation behavior of The Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC) excavation case history. Canadian Geotechnical Journal.Google Scholar
  8. Sowers, G.F. (1979). Introductory Soil Mechanics and Foundations. Geotechnical engineering, 114–117.Google Scholar
  9. Rankin, W.J. Ground Movements Resulting from Urban Tunnelling: Predictions and Effects. Eng. Geol. of Underground Movements (1988).Google Scholar
  10. Tan, Y.C., and Chow, C.M. (2008). Design of retaining wall and support systems for deep basement construction–a Malaysian experience. In Seminar on “Deep Excavation and Retaining Walls”, IEM-HKIE, Malaysia (Vol. 24).Google Scholar
  11. Tang, Y.G., and Kung, G.T.C. (2012). Risk assessment of building damage potential adjacent to a braced excavation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quoc Thien Huynh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Van Qui Lai
    • 1
  • Viet Thai Tran
    • 2
  • Minh Tam Nguyen
    • 1
  1. 1.HCMC University of Technology, VNU-HCM, HCMCHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Hoa Binh Construction Group Joint Stock Company, HCMCHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations