Advertisement

Pressure Infiltration Characteristics of Foam for EPB Shield Tunnelling

  • Tao XuEmail author
  • Adam Bezuijen
  • Wan-Huan Zhou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 62)

Abstract

Infiltration of pressurised foam into saturated sand has been investigated in a laboratory setup that provides a comparable hydraulic gradient as in real tunnels. It appears that the permeability of sand for foam decreases as FER of the foam increases until a limit FER (approximately 15 for the foaming agent and sand used in this experiment). For higher FERs the permeability remains more or less constant. It was found that a ‘dry’ foam (FER = 20) is not essential for formation of a low permeable layer in the sand, even a ‘wet’ foam (FER = 5) can form a low permeable layer. When the discharge is less than that corresponding to the drilling velocity of a TBM, there will be no foam spurt and consequently no zone with low permeability. Without a low permeability plastering at the tunnel face the pressure applied through the foam will be less effective to stabilize the face.

Keywords

foam EPB shield infiltration permeability FER 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the scholarship funded by China Scholarship Council, the Mobility Fund of Ghent University, the University of Macau Research Fund MYRG2017-00198-FST and the Macau FDCT fund 193/2017/A3.

References

  1. Amoun, S., Sharifzadeh, M., Shahriar, K., Rostami, J. and Azali, S. T. (2017). Evaluation of tool wear in EPB tunneling of Tehran Metro, Line 7 Expansion. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 61, pp 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezuijen, A. and Schaminée, P. E. L. (2001). Simulation of the EPB-shield TBM in model tests with foam as additive. Proc. Int. Symp. on Modern Tunneling Science and Techn. Kyoto.Google Scholar
  3. Bezuijen, A. (2002). The influence of permeability on the properties of a foam mixture in a TBM. 4th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground – IS Toulouse 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Bezuijen, A. (2011). Foam used during EPB tunnelling in saturated sand, description of mechanisms, Proc. WTC 2011, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  5. Bezuijen, A. (2012). Foam used during EPB tunnelling in saturated sand, parameters determining foam consumption. Proceedings WTC 2012, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  6. Budach, C. (2012). Extended application ranges of EPB-Shields in coarse-grained soils. Doctoral thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar
  7. Budach, C. and Thewes, M. (2015). Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 50, pp 296-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Condat Lubricants. (2015). New high-tech foaming agent for TBM. https://www.condatlubricants.com/product/sealant-foam-lubricanttunnel-boring/foaming-agents-epb/.
  9. Galli, M. (2016). Bochum Rheological characterisation of Earth-Pressure-Balance (EPB) support medium composed of noncohesive soils and foam. Doctoral thesis, Ruhr-Universität, Germany.Google Scholar
  10. Maidl, U., Pierri, J. (2014). Innovative hybrid EPB tunnelling in Rio de Janeiro. Geomech. Tunn. 7, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merritt, A., Jefferis, S., Storry, R. and Brais, L. (2013). Soil conditioning laboratory trials for the Port of Miami Tunnel, Miami, Florida, USA. In: Proceedings of the ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress in Geneva.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merritt, A. S. and Mair, R. J. (2006). Mechanics of tunnelling machine screw conveyors: model tests. Géotechnique, 56(9), pp 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peila, D., Oggeri, C. and Vinai, R. (2007). Screw conveyor device for laboratory tests on conditioned soils for EPB tunneling operations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 133, pp 1622–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Talmon, A. M., Mastbergen, D. R., and Huisman, M. (2013). Invasion of pressurized clay suspensions into granular soil. Journal of Porous Media, 16, pp 351-365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Xu, T. and Bezuijen, A. (2018a). Pressure infiltration characteristics of bentonite slurry. Géotechnique.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.T.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu, T. and Bezuijen, A. (2018b). Analytical methods in predicting excess pore water pressure in front of slurry shield in saturated sandy ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 73, pp 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MacauMacaoChina
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations