Advertisement

Keynote Lecture: Soil-water-tunnel interaction at the front face of a TBM

  • Adam BezuijenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 62)

Abstract

Tunnelling induced groundwater flow is important for the stability of the tunnel face and the time it will take to create and low permeable tunnel face. Infiltration of slurry or foam at the tunnel face has been tested in the past without considering the influence of groundwater flow, resulting in too high infiltration velocities. The contribution first analyses the groundwater flow during tunnelling in both an unconfined and semi-confined sandy aquifer, followed by studying the relation between the groundwater flow and infiltration of slurry and foam at the tunnel face. Consequences will be discussed.

Keywords

bored tunnelling pore water pressures EPB slurry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aime, R., Aristaghes, P., Autuori, P. and Minec, S. (2004). 15 m Diameter Tunneling under Netherlands Polders. Proc. Underground Space for Sustainable Urban Development, Proc WTC Singapore, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Autuori, P. and Minec, S. (2005). Large diameter tunnelling under polders. Proc. 5th Int. Symposium on Underground Construction in soft Ground, IS-Amsterdam 2005, pp 181-186Google Scholar
  3. Bezuijen, A. (2012). Foam used during EPB tunnelling in saturated sand, parameters determining foam consumption. Proc. WTC 2012, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  4. Bezuijen, A. (2002), The influence of permeability on the properties of a foam mixture in a TBM. Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground – IS Toulouse.Google Scholar
  5. Bezuijen, A. and Xu T. (2018). Excess pore water pressures in front of a tunnel face when drilling in a semiconfined aquifer. Proc. WTC 2018, Dubai.Google Scholar
  6. Bezuijen, A. and Dias, T. G. S. (2017). EPB, chamber pressure dissipation during standstill. Proc. IV Int. Conf. on Computational methods in tunneling and subsurface engineering, Innsbruck.Google Scholar
  7. Bezuijen, A., Steeneken, S.P. and Ruigrok, J.A.T. (2016). Monitoring and Analysing Pressures around a TBM. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Underground Construction Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  8. Bezuijen A. and Talmon A.M. (2008). Processes around a TBM. Proc. 6th Int. conf. Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, Shanghai, China pp: 19-30Google Scholar
  9. Bezuijen A., Pruiksma J.P. and Meerten H.H. van (2001). Pore pressures in front of tunnel, measurements, calculations and consequences for stability of tunnel face. Proc. Int. Symp. on Modern Tunneling Science and Techn. Kyoto.Google Scholar
  10. Broere, W. (2001) Tunnel Face Stability & & New CPT Applications. PhD thesis. Delft: Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. COB commission 100 (1999), Monitoring during construction of the second Heinenoord Tunnel. Report of large-scale research for bored tunnels. COBGoogle Scholar
  12. Dias, T. G. S. and Bezuijen, A. (2016). A different view on TBM face equilibrium in permeable ground. In Proceedings of the ITA world tunnel congress 2016 – uniting an industry, vol. 1, pp. 94–103. Englewood, CO, USA: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.Google Scholar
  13. Hoefsloot, F.J.M. (2001). Pore pressures in front of the bore front: A simple hydrological model (in Dutch). Geotechniek, October. pp. 26-33.Google Scholar
  14. Kaalberg, Nijs R.E.P. de, and Ruigrok J.A.T., (2014). TBM face stability & excess pore presssures in close proximity of piled bridge foundations controlled with 3D FEM. Proc. of 8th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, ISSeoul.Google Scholar
  15. Krause, T. (1987): Schildvortrieb flüssigkeitsgestuetzte Ortsbrust. (in German) Dissertation. Technische Universität, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
  16. Xu, T. (2019). Infiltration and excess pore water pressures in front of a TBM: experiments, mechanisms and computational models. PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
  17. Xu, T. and Bezuijen A. (2019). Experimental study on the mechanisms of bentonite slurry penetration in front of a slurry TBM. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 93,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zizka, Z. (2018) Stability of a slurry supported tunnel face considering the transient support mechanism during excavation in non-cohesive soil. PhD thesis, Bochum University, Germany.Google Scholar
  19. Zizka, Z., Schoesser, B., Popovic, I. and Thewes, M. (2017). Excess Pore Pressures in Front of the Tunnel Face During Slurry Shield Excavations due to Different Time Scales for Excavation Sequence of Cutting Tools and Penetration Time of Support Fluid. EURO: TUN 2017, Innsbruck University, Austria.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations