Advertisement

Adaptation of Halophytes to the Gradient Conditions on the Northern Seas Coast

  • Evgeniya Markovskaya
  • Anatoly Kosobryukhov
  • Elena Gulyaeva
  • Anastasiia Starodubtseva
Chapter
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Nowadays, it is relevant to study the mechanisms of rhythmic processes that are the basis of the vital activity of all organisms. From this point of view, it is necessary to study the functioning of organisms living in tidal conditions on the coastal zone of the northern seas. Twice a day, plants are flooded with water on the intertidal zone, and then they go out for drying—there is a change in the water and air environment, which is accompanied by changes in light, temperature, oxygen and CO2  concentrations, pressure, and other parameters. These conditions have led to the formation of a unique halophyte complex of higher terrestrial plants, which have formed various adaptive mechanisms that provide the possibilities for normal existence. Three zones are distinguished on the coastal zone of the White Sea: supratidal, intertidal, and subtidal zones. For each zone, the following species was investigated: for supratidal—Alopecurus arundinaceus, Atriplex glabriuscula, Carex subspathacea; for intertidal—Tripolium vulgare, Triglochin maritima, Salicornia europaea, and three species of Plantago genus; for subtidal—Zostera marina. Species growing on intertidal and subtidal zones are resistant to flooding and have various structural and functional adaptations. The photosynthetic characteristics (CO2 rate of gas exchange, transpiration, stomatal conductivity, and CO2 concentration in the intercellular spaces of the leaves) were studied using the LCPro + portable gas analyzer at natural light intensity and air temperature. Analysis of CO2 exchange curves by the model of Farquhar et al. showed a difference in the values of the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax), the electron transport rate at light saturation (Jmax), the utilization rate of triose phosphate, and a number of other parameters in plants of different zones. A comparative study of physiological parameters showed the highest functional activity in plants in the intertidal zone, which undergo daily tidal dynamics. The influence of environmental factors on the content of chlorophylls a and b and the amount of carotenoids was estimated. Evaluation of the implementation of photosynthetic activity in natural habitats in relation to the maximum values at saturating concentration of CO2 showed that the species of higher vascular plants realize their potential in the range of 6–20% on the supratidal zone, from 10 to 70% on the intertidal zone, and from 30 to 60% on the subtidal zone. In the case of a global increase of CO2 concentration, we can expect a significant increase in CO2 absorption by the following halophytes: T. vulgare, Plantago maritima, Z. marina, Al. arundinaceus, and At. glabriuscula, as well as an increase in productivity of P. maritima and Z. marina among the studied halophytes of the coastal zones of the northern Holarctic seas.

Keywords

Halophytes Supratidal zone Intertidal zone Subtidal zone—photosynthesis Pigments—ecological factors Daily rhythm 

Abbreviations

DM

Dry mass

ETR

Electron transport rate

Jmax

Electron transport rate at light saturation

LHC

Light-harvesting complex

RuBisCO

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

SP

Sample plot

TPU

Triose phosphate utilization

Vcmax

Maximum carboxylation rate

References

  1. Adam P (1990) Saltmarsh ecology. Cambridge studies in ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleksandrova VD, Yurkovskaya TK (1989) Geobotanical zoning of the nonblack earth soil of the European part of the Russian soviet federative socialist republic. Science, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong W, Wright EJ, Lythe S, Gaynard TJ (1985) Plant zonation and the effects of the spring-neap tidal cycle on soil aeration in a Humber salt marsh. J Ecol 73:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlas of the Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (1989) Moscow: main department of geodesy and cartographyGoogle Scholar
  5. Atlas of the USSR (1985) Moscow: main department of geodesy and cartographyGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin MP (1990) Community theory and competition in vegetation. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic, New York, pp 215–238Google Scholar
  7. Bakker M, Govers G, Kosmas C, Vanacker V, Oost K, Rounsevell M (2005) Soil erosion as a driver of land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger V (1995) White sea. Biological resources and problems of their rational use. Part I. St. PeterburgGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger V (2007) Productive potential of the White Sea. ZIN RAN, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertness MD (1991) Zonation of Spartina spp. in New England salt marshes. Ecol 72:138–148Google Scholar
  11. Bockelmann AC, Neuhaus R (1999) Competitive exclusion of Elymus athericus from a high-stress habitat in a European salt marsh. J Ecol 87:503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowes G, Rao SK, Estavillo GM, Reiskind JB (2002) C4 mechanisms in aquatic angiosperms: comparisons with terrestrial C4 systems. Funct Plant Biol 29:379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brouwer R (1962) Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. J Agric Sci 10:399–408Google Scholar
  14. Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1982) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange rates of leaves. Planta 153:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carty S (2003) Zostera marina and Neotrypaea californiensis as indicators of ecosystem integrity in Grice Bay, British Columbia. Master’s thesis, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Colmer TD, Pedersen O (2008) Underwater photosynthesis and respiration in leaves of submerged wetland plants: gas films improve CO2 and O2 exchange. New Phytol 177:918–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies P, Morvan C, Sire O, Baley C (2007) Structure and properties of fibres from sea-grass (Zostera marina). J Mater Sci 42(13):4850–4857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawes CJ (1998) Marine botany. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  19. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 plants. Planta 149(1):78–90Google Scholar
  20. Gorham J, Hughes L, Wyn Jones R (1980) Chemical composition of salt-marsh plants from Ynys Mon (Angelesey): the concept of physiotypes. Plant Cell Environ 3:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grigore MN, Toma C (2017) Anatomical adaptation of halophytes. A review of classic literature and recent findings, Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  22. Grigore MN, Ivanescu L, Toma C (2014) Halophytes: an integrative anatomical study. Springer, BaselGoogle Scholar
  23. Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991) An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate re-entry into the chloroplast. Photosynth Res 27:169–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jagels R (1983) Further evidence for osmoregulation in epidermal leaf cells of seagrasses. Am J Bot 70(3):327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khaitov VM, Zaychikova AA, Poloskin AV, Skazina MA (2013) Nature monument—long bay of the big Solovetsky Island: features of the benthic population (review of works by EA Nienburg and his students). In: Materials of the scientific conference “Marine biology, geology, oceanology—interdisciplinary research at marine stations”. Moscow, pp 311–3316Google Scholar
  26. Kinzel H (1982) Pflanzenokologie und Mineralstoffwechsel. UlmerVerlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirillova NR (2013) Populations of Triglochin maritima L (Juncagináceae) in the marsh communities of the Murmansk region. In: Materials of the scientific conference “Biodiversity and cultural cenoses in extreme conditions”, Apatity. 205 pGoogle Scholar
  28. Kravchenko AB (2007) Сonspectus of the Karelian flora. KarRC, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurokawa Y, Nagai K, Huan PD et al (2018) Rice leaf hydrophobicity and gas films are conferred by a wax synthesis gene (LGF1) and contribute to flood tolerance. New Phytol 218:1558–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larkum A (2006) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Springer, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Larkum A, Davey P, Kuo J et al (2017) Carbon-concentrating mechanisms in seagrasses. J Exp Bot 68:3773–3784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leontyev OK (1991) Coast of the Arctic ocean. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids—pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maberly SC, Madsen TV (2002) Freshwater angiosperm carbon concentrating mechanisms: processes and patterns. Funct Plant Biol 29:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maksimovich NV, Ivanov MV, Bukina MV (2004) Modern status and prospects for trade of sea grass Zostera marina L. in coastal waters of the Karelian coast of the White Sea. In: The study, sustainable use and conservation of natural resources of the White Sea. Proceedings of the IXth International Conference. KarRC, Petrozavodsk, pp 208–210Google Scholar
  36. Markovskaya EF, Shmakova NY (2017) Plants and Lichens of Western Svalbard: ecology, physiology. PetrSU, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  37. Markovskaya EF, Sergienko LA, Shklyarevich GA, Sonina AV, Starodubtseva AA, Smolkova OV (2010) Natural complex of the White Sea coast: schoolbook. PetrSU, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  38. Markovskaya EF, Kosobryukhov AA, Morosova KV, Gulyaeva EN (2015) Photosynthesis and anatomico-morphological characteristics of the sea aster leaves on the White Sea coast. Russ J Plant Physiol 62(6):830–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maslova TG, Popova IA, Popova OR (1986) Critical evaluation of the spectrophotometric method for quantification of carotenoids. Russ J Plant Physiol 33(3):615–619Google Scholar
  40. Minden V, Andratschke S, Spalke J, Timmermann H, Kleyer M (2012) Plant trait–environment relationships in salt marshes: deviations from predictions by ecological concepts. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mokronosov AT (1999) Global photosynthesis and vegetation biodiversity. In: Global environmental and climate change: the carbon cycle in Russia. Science, Moscow, pp 19–62Google Scholar
  42. Neinhuis С, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79:667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parsons R, Ogston S (1999) Photosyn Assistant Ver. 1.1.2. Dundee Scientific, DundeeGoogle Scholar
  44. Pedersen O, Sand-Jensen K, Revsbech NP (1995) Diel pulses of O2 and CO2 in in sandy lake sediments inhabited by Lobelia dortmanna. Ecology 76:1536–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennings SC, Callaway RM (1992) Salt marsh plant zonation: the relative importance of competition and physical factors. Ecology 73:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramenskaya ML, Shubin VI (1975) Natural zoning in relation to reforestation. In the Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic and the Murmansk region. KarRC, Petrozavodsk, pp 180–198Google Scholar
  47. Romanov AA (1961) About the climate of Karelia. Gosizdat Karel, ASSR, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  48. Rozema J, Bijwaard P, Prast G, Broekman R (1985) Ecophysiological adaptations of coastal halophytes from foredunes and salt marshes. Vegetation 62:499–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sapozhnikov DI, Maslova TG, Popov OF et al (1978) Leaf fixation and storage method for the quantitative determination of plastid pigments. Bot J 63(11):1586–1592Google Scholar
  50. Schirmer U, Breckle SW (1982) The role of bladders for saltremoval in some Chenopodiaceae (mainly Atriplex species). In: Sen DN, Rajpurohit KS (eds) Contribution to the ecology of halophytes. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Hague, pp 215–231Google Scholar
  51. Scholten M, Blaauw PA, Stroetenga M, Rozema J (1987) The impact of competitive interactions on the growth and distribution of plant species in salt marshes. In: Huiskes AHL, Blom CWPM, Rozema J (eds) Vegetation between land and sea. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Hague, pp 270–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sekretareva ON (2004) Vascular plants of the Russian Arctic and adjacent territories. KMK Scientific Press Ltd, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  53. Sergienko LA (2008) Flora and vegetation of the Russian Arctic coasts and adjacent territories. PetrSU, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith J (2008) Zostera marina L. Available from http://depts.washington.edu/fhl/mb/Zostera_Jess2/SingleCS.jpgfree
  55. Starodubtseva AA, Kozrubukhov AA, Markovskaya EF (2011) The influence of light conditions on photosynthesis of Zostera marina L in the littoral zone of the White Sea. Modern problems of science and education. Biol Sci 6:6Google Scholar
  56. Tolmachev AI, Yurtsev BA (1970) The history of the Arctic flora and its relationship with the history of the Arctic ocean. In: Arctic ocean and its coast in Cenozoic. Hydrometeorological Publishing House, Leningrad, pp 87–100Google Scholar
  57. Touchette BW (2007) Seagrass-salinity interactions: physiological mechanisms used by submersed marine angiosperms for a life at sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 350:194–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Diggelen J, Rozema J, Dickson DMJ, Broekman R (1986) b-3-dimethylsulphoniopropionate, proline and quaternary ammonium compounds in Spartina anglica in relation to sodium chloride, nitrogen and sulphur. New Phytol 103:573–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vekhov VN (1992) Zostera marina L. of the White Sea. Moscow University Press, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamlaev S (2010) Changes in the regulation on the state natural reserve “Birch Islands” as a result of a comprehensive environmental study of sites. Available from http://oopt.aari.ru/system/files/documents/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evgeniya Markovskaya
    • 1
  • Anatoly Kosobryukhov
    • 2
  • Elena Gulyaeva
    • 1
  • Anastasiia Starodubtseva
    • 1
  1. 1.Petrozavodsk State UniversityPetrozavodskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Basic Biological Problems, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow RegionRussia

Personalised recommendations