Advertisement

Curating an Affective Push: Indian Women’s Facebook Profile Pictures and their Affective Turns

  • Benson Rajan
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The Facebook profile picture of an Indian woman has a specific affective turn in a digital environment. The digital life embodies immersions into bits governed by software and accessed through hardware. It is a lifestyle managed and reduced to bits of information that we store and exchange for our virtual existence. The digital space has expanded the range of the body beyond its biological existence. The participation in the virtual gives an openness to the body, where it is not just about what happens to bodies in encounters, but also what can it be made to do in mixed reality. The digitized curation of a women’s profile picture on social media caters to a culture of absent presence. This chapter engages with the functioning of absent presence in the digital representation of women’s bodies on Facebook in Bangalore. This explorative study portrays an assemblage of affect and sensory semiotics to explain the affective intensity of sensory mediation online and its interpretation in engaging with the concept of lack (absent) that is surrounded by desire and human representations (presence) (Deleuze and Guattari in Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Books, New York, 2009). Symbolism and its semiotic properties of curation were prioritized as the highest analytical concern for this study on Facebook profile pictures. The study showed that Indian women spend a significant amount of time and effort to create the perfect profile picture as part of an affective push they feel from their environment.

Keywords

Profile picture Curation Affective push Social status Indian women Identity 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In G. J. Seigworth & M. Gregg (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–52). London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arps, B. (2018, July 17). A model is being accused of Photoshopping this swimsuit photo on Instagram. This Is Insider..Google Scholar
  3. Bell, B. T., & Dittmar, H. (2011). Does media type matter? The role of identification in adolescent girls’ media consumption and the impact of different thin-ideal media on body image. Sex Roles, 65 (1), 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2014). A content analysis of healthy living blogs: Evidence of content thematically consistent with dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47 (4), 362–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2016). A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49 (1), 98–101.Google Scholar
  6. Botta, R. (1999). Television images and adolescent girls’ body image disturbance. Journal of Communication, 49(2), 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Calvino, I. (1984). The adventure of a photographer. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  9. Cecchetto, D. (2011). Deconstructing affect: Post-humanism and Mark Hansen’s media theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(5), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Light Books.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. (1997). Essays critical and clinical. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dimulescu, V. (2015). Contemporary representations of the female body: Consumerism and the normative discourse of beauty. Phil Archive. https://philarchive.org/archive/DIMCRO-2. Accessed June 15, 2019.
  15. Dissanayake, W. (2009). Asian cinema and the social imaginary. Educational Perspectives, 42, 10–14.Google Scholar
  16. Featherstone, M. (2010). Body, image and affect in consumer culture. Body & Society, 16 (1), 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossberg, L. (2010). Affect’s future: Rediscovering the virtual in actual. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 309–339). London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guattari, F., & Bains, P. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, S. (1996). When was ‘the post-colonial’? Thinking at the limit. In I. Chambers & L. Curti (Eds.), The Post-colonial Question. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, M. B. N. (2006). Bodies in code: Interfaces with digital media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, K., & Hefner, V. (2006). Media exposure, current and future body ideals, and disordered eating among preadolescent girls: A longitudinal panel study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35 (2), 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). “Strong beats skinny every time”: Disordered eating and compulsive exercise in women who post fitspiration on Instagram. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 76–79.Google Scholar
  24. Honko, L. (1996). Epic and identity: National, regional, communal, individual. Oral Tradition, 1 (1), 18–36.Google Scholar
  25. Kasch, M. D. (2013). Social media selves: College students’ curation of self and others through Facebook (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  26. Kellner, D. (2003). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the post-modern. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishnan, R., & Chandrashekhar, A. (2019, June 22). Facebook may abort Libra launch in India. The Economic Times.Google Scholar
  28. Lacau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Levine, M. P., & Harrison, K. (2009). Effects of media on eating disorders and body image. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 490–517). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. London, B. (2015, January 27). The celebrities facing a backlash over ‘Photoshopped’ snaps. Daily Mail.Google Scholar
  31. Massumi, B. (2010). The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In G. J. Seigworth & M. Gregg (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 52–71). London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mooney, P. (2016). ‘Exposing fitness’ Instagram photos call out photoshop fakes: ‘Devin Physique’ posts 15-Second Ab clapback. Inquisiter.Google Scholar
  33. Mulvey, L. (1975). Narrative cinema and visual pleasure. Screen, 16 (3), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Odden, L. (2016, December 1). Lee Odden on influencer marketing strategy. Funnel Cake.Google Scholar
  35. Probyn, E. (2010). Writing shame. In G. J. Seigworth & M. Gregg (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 71–93). London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rajan, B. (2018a). Fitness selfie and anorexia: A study of ‘fitness’ selfies of women on Instagram and its contribution to anorexia nervosa. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 4(2), 66–89.Google Scholar
  37. Rajan, B. (2018b). The digital showcase: A study on affective encounters with women’s body representation as profile pictures on Facebook. Revista Académica sobre Documentación Digitaly Comunicación Interactiva, 17, 64–73.Google Scholar
  38. Rajan, B. (2018c). A Picture is worth a thousand words: A Study on millennial women’s curation of self on Facebook profile pictures. Comunicación y Género, 1(2),173–191.  https://doi.org/10.5209/cgen.62674.
  39. Scharrer, E. L. (2013). Representations of gender in the media. In K. E. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of media psychology (pp. 267–284). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Spinoza, B. (1677). Ethica. English Edition: Spinoza, B. (2000). Spinoza ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2016). ‘Strong is the new skinny’: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram. Journal of Health Psychology, 23 (8), 1003–1011.Google Scholar
  43. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2019, June 18). Facebook’s Libra launch will extend its global domination. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  44. Walther, J., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34 (1), 28–49.Google Scholar
  45. Waterworth, A. J., Waterworth, H. E., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G. (2010). On feeling (the) present: An evolutionary account of the sense of presence in physical and electronically-mediated environments. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17 (1–2), 167–188.Google Scholar
  46. Yang, C.-C., Holden, S. M., & Carter, Mollie D. K. (2018). Social media social comparison of ability (but not opinion) predicts lower identity clarity: Identity processing style as a mediator. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47 (10), 2114–2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benson Rajan
    • 1
  1. 1.Jindal School of Journalism and CommunicationO.P. Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations