Advertisement

Monitoring and Modelling of Urban Sprawl Using Geospatial Techniques—A Case Study of Shimla City, India

  • Pawan Kumar ThakurEmail author
  • Manish Kumar
  • Vaibhav E. Gosavi
Chapter
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences book series (AGES)

Abstract

Urban Sprawl, a burning global phenomenon, refers to that extent of city or urbanisation, which may driven by industrialisation, population growth, settlement on the periphery of the city and large-scale migration. India, with population of over one billion, which is one-sixth of the world’s total population, phenomenon of Urban Sprawl is affecting its natural resources like never before. This results in multiple problems such as unmanageable transportation, unemployment which results in poverty, illegal housing colonies, slums, etc. This study illustrates the use of Geospatial and Statistical Techniques to highlight the extent of Urban Sprawl in Shimla Municipal Corporation, Himachal Pradesh, India; at a detailed level. In the present work, four temporal satellite images of Landsat Thematic Mapper have been used over a period of nearly two decades (i.e. 1991–2011). Landsat imageries of two time periods (Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) of 1991 and 2011; and ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper) 2001), were used and quantified for studying the decadal change in land use/land cover. Supervised classification methods have been employed using Support Vector Machine in ENVI 5.0 and ERDAS 2014. The study area is categorized into five different classes, viz. water bodies, forest area, built-up area, agriculture and open space. The results indicate that built-up area is the major land use in study area. During the period 1991–2011, the area under built-up land has increased by 529.65 ha (26.48)% due to construction of new buildings on forest land, agricultural land and open spaces. As a result, the area under vegetation (forest), open space and water bodies decreased by −361.71 ha (−18 09%), −178.02 ha (−8.90%), 0.36 ha (0.02%) respectively. Urban built-up density was calculated in percentage (%) for 25 wards of the city for 1991, 2001 and 2011. Depending on the density levels, it categorized as low, medium and high density. The process of urban expansion in the Shimla City during 1991, 2001 and 2011 are further studied by examining a distance decay concept from a major road. The study also highlights the nature, rate and location of change; and the importance of digital change detection techniques in land use planning for sustainable growth of the study area. The Shannon’s Entropy Index and Landscape Metrics have been computed in order to quantify the urban growth using built-up area as a spatial unit. Further, Stepwise Regression techniques were used to explore the relationship between the urban growth and its contributory factors. Further, Stepwise Regression was used to study the impact of Independent Variables (population density, female literacy rate, road density, total workers, sex ratio, α-population, number of HH, β-population) and Dependent Variables (percentage of built-Up area) factors on urban growth. The result shows that the growing population triggers the increase in built-up area in study area. This study also demonstrates the potentials of geospatial data in mapping, measuring and modelling the urban sprawl, which could be helpful to decision makers to form/make particular decision support system for sustainable growth of hilly urban areas or in making Smart City planning.

Keywords

Urban sprawl SVM Digital change detection Built-up density Shannon’s entropy Stepwise regression Shimla city 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Vice Chancellor, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand for providing facilities in SSJ Campus of University at Almora, where the present work has been done for Master Dissertation. Authors are also like to acknowledge the Director, G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttrakhand for providing facilities in Himachal Regional Centre of the Institute where we could modify and finalize the present work.

References

  1. Alexakis D, Hadjimitsis D, Agapiou A, Themistokleous K, Retalis A (2011) Monitoring urban land cover with the use of satellite remote sensing techniques as a means of flood risk assessment in Cyprus. Sens Syst Next-Gener Satell XV, vol 8176.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.898185
  2. Araya YH (2009) Urban land use change analysis and modeling: a case study of Setúbal and Sesimbra, Portugal. Master thesis, Institute for Geinformatics, University of MünsterGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey KD (2009) Entropy systems theory. Systems Science and Cybernetics, Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK, pp 152–169. http://www.eolss.net/ebooks/Sample%20Chapters/C02/E6-46-01-04.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2008
  4. Barnes KB, Morgan JM III, Roberge MC, Lowe S (2001) Sprawl development: its patterns, consequences, and measurement. Towson University, Towson. http://www.chesapeake.towson.edu/landscape/urbansprawl/download/Sprawl.whitepaper.pdf
  5. Batty M, Howes D (2001) Predicting temporal patterns in urban development from remote imagery. In: Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (eds) Remote sensing and urban analysis. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 185 204Google Scholar
  6. Batty M, Xie Y, Sun Z (1999) The dynamics of urban sprawl. Working paper series, paper 15, centre for advanced spatial analysis, University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabral P, Geroyannis H, Gilg JP, Painho M (2005) Analysis and modelling of land-use and land-cover change in Sintra-Cascais area In: Proceedings of 8th agile conference, Estoril, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  8. Census of India (2001) http://www.censusindia.net
  9. Census of India (2011) http://www.censusindia.net
  10. Cheng J, Masser I (2003) Urban growth pattern modelling: a case study of Wuhan City, PR China. Landsc Urban Plan 62:199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Civco DL, Hurd JD, Wilson EH, Arnold CL, Prisloe M (2002) Quantifying and describing urbanizing landscapes in the Northeast United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(10):1083–1090Google Scholar
  12. Clarke KC, Parks BO, Crane MP (2002) Geographic information systems and environmental modeling. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1996) Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a cellular automation model of urban growth. In: Proceedings of the third international conference/workshop on integrating GIS and environmental modelling, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 21–25 Jan 1996Google Scholar
  14. Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (2001) Remote sensing and urban analysis. In: Donnay JP, Barnsley MJ, Longley PA (eds) Remote sensing and urban analysis. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  15. Eiden G, Kayadjanian M, Vidal C (2012) Capturing landscape structures: tools. The European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/landscape/ch1.htm. Accessed 8 June 2015
  16. Epstein J, Payne K, Kramer E (2002) Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63(9):913–918Google Scholar
  17. Gomarasca MA, Brivio PA, Pagnoni F, Galli A (1993) One century of land use changes in the metropolitan area of Milan (Italy). Int J Remote Sens 14(2):211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green K, Kempka D, Lackey L (1994) Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land/cover and land/use change. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60:331–337Google Scholar
  19. Haack BN, Rafter A (2006) Urban growth analysis and modelling in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal. Habitat Int 30(4):1056–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herold M, Clarke KC, Scepan J (2002) Remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land use. Environ Plan A 34:1443–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herold M, Menz G, Clarke KC (2001) Remote sensing and urban growth models demands and perspectives. In: Symposium on remote sensing of urban areas, Regensburg, Germany, vol 35Google Scholar
  22. Hurd JD, Wilson EH, Lammey SG, Civco DL (2001) Characterisation of forest fragmentation and urban sprawl using time sequential Landsat Imagery. In: Proceedings of the ASPRS annual convention, St. Louis, MO, 23–27 AprGoogle Scholar
  23. ICIMOD (1999) Integration of GIS, remote sensing and ecological methods for biodiversity inventory and assessment. In: Issues in mountain development. http://www.icimodgis.net/web/publications/IssuesMountain61999.pdf
  24. Jantz CA, Goetz, Scott J (2005) Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land/use- change model. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(2):217–241Google Scholar
  25. Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D (2008) Modeling of urban growth using spatial analysis techniques: a case study of Ajmer city (India). Int J Remote Sens 29(2):543–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D (2007) Monitoring and modeling urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 10(1):26– 43Google Scholar
  27. Jensen JR, Cowen DC (1999) Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio economic attributes. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65(5):611–622Google Scholar
  28. Jha R, Singh VP, Vatsa V (2008) Analysis of urban development of Haridwar, India, using entropy approach. J Civil Eng 12(4):281–288Google Scholar
  29. Joshi PK, Lele N, Agarwal SP (2006) Entropy as an indicator of fragmented landscape. Curr Sci 91(3):276–278Google Scholar
  30. Jothimani P (1997) Operational urban sprawl monitoring using satellite remote sensing: excerpts from the studies of Ahmedabad, Vadodara and Surat, India. Paper presented at 18th Asian conference on remote sensing held during 20–24 Oct 1997, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar JAV, Pathan SK, Bhanderi RJ (2007) Spatio-temporal analysis for monitoring urban growth-a case study of Indore city. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35(1):11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lata KM, Sankar Rao CH, Krishna Prasad V, Badrinath KVS, Raghavaswamy (2001). Measuring urban sprawl: a case study of Hyderabad. GIS Dev 5(12):22–25Google Scholar
  33. Lo CP, Yang X (2002) Drivers of land-use/land-cover changes and dynamic modelling for the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(10):1062–1073Google Scholar
  34. Pontius RG Jr, Claessens L, Hopkinson C Jr, Marzouk A, Rastetter EB, Schneider LC, Vallino J (2000) Scenarios of land-use change and nitrogen release in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Paper presented at 4th international conference on integrating GIS and environmental modelling (GIS/EM4): problems, prospects and research needs. Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2–8 Sept 2000. http://www.colorado.edu/research/cires/banff/pubpapers/165/
  35. Punia M, Singh L (2012) Entropy approach for assessment of urban growth: a case study of Jaipur, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40(2):231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Punia, M., and Singh, L., (2011), Entropy Approach for Assessment of Urban Growth: A Case Study of Jaipur, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0141-z
  37. Rawat JS, Kumar M (2015) Monitoring land use/cover change using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Hawalbagh block, district Almora, Uttarakhand, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.02.002
  38. Sierra Club (1998) The dark side of the American dream: the costs and consequences of suburban sprawl. (http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report98/)
  39. Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Jagadish KS (2004) Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. Int J Appl Earth Obs 5:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Jagadish KS (2003) Urban sprawl pattern recognition and modelling using GIS. Paper presented at Map India, 2003, New Delhi, 28–31 Jan 2003Google Scholar
  41. The Regionalist (1997) Debate on theories of david rusk, vol 2, no 3. http://scpp.ubalt.edu/public/regional/detail.htm. issue3v2
  42. Torrens PM, Alberti M (2000) Measuring sprawl. Working paper no. 27, Centre for advanced spatial analysis, University College, London. http://www.casa.ac.uk/workingpapers/
  43. Torrens PM, O’ Sullivan D (2001) Cellular automata and urban simulation: where do we go from here? Environ Plann B 28:163–168Google Scholar
  44. Trani MK, Giles RH (1999) An analysis of deforestation: metrics used to describe pattern change. For Ecol Manage 114(2):459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waddell P (2002) Urban Sim: modelling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. J Am Plann Assoc 68(3):297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weijers D (2012) The suitability of GIS methods for analyzing urban sprawl, and the influence of scale. Master degree thesis geographical information management & applications, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  47. Weng Q (2001) Modelling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. Environ Manage 28(6):737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xi F, He HS, Hu Y, Wu X, Bu R, Chang Y, Liu M, Yu J (2009) Simulate urban growth based on RS, GIS, and SLEUTH model in Shenyang-Fushun metropolitan area north-eastern China. Urban Remote Sens Jt Event 1(3):959–968Google Scholar
  49. Yang X, Liu Z (2005) Use of satellite derived landscape imperviousness index to characterize urban spatial growth. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29:524–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang X, Lo CP (2003) Modelling urban growth and landscape changes in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(5):463–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeh AGO, Li X (2001) Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67(1):83–90Google Scholar
  52. Yu XJ, Ng CN (2007) Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects: a case study of Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan 79:96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pawan Kumar Thakur
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manish Kumar
    • 2
  • Vaibhav E. Gosavi
    • 1
  1. 1.G. B. Pant, National Institute of Himalayan Environmental & Sustainable Development, Himachal Regional CentreMohal-KulluIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKalindi College, University of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations