Advertisement

Perfecting Family

  • Maznah MohamadEmail author
Chapter
  • 16 Downloads
Part of the Contestations in Contemporary Southeast Asia book series (CCSA)

Abstract

This chapter explores premises that underscore the quest for ‘perfecting’ the Islamic family, as envisioned by the Divine Bureaucracy, where one of its foremost priorities is the reformulation of syariah to embody a new Malay-Muslim masculinity and femininity. The chapter examines contentious male-female syariah litigation, the teaching and learning of marriage and the judicial displacement of Muslim-non-Muslim family units, where one partner is Muslim and the other a non-Muslim. It documents and analyses the evolution of syariah family laws over different periods of social reform. Then it explores how the perfection of the new Muslim family has also involved more affable routes such as the certification of mandatory marriage education courses before any Muslim marriage can take place. Through these courses, marriage is objectified as a set of skills and conduct that is teachable and learnt. The judicialisation of the Muslim-non-Muslim family is shown to have worked towards the disruption rather than the protection of family, and highlights the Divine Bureaucracy as the key agent of both family-making and unmaking.

Keywords

Malay-Muslim masculinity Malay-Muslim femininity Masculine protectionism Marriage education Islamic family Muslim-non-Muslim family 

References

  1. Abdul Monir, Yaacob (2016) Perkembangan Pentadbiran Undang-Undang Islam di Malaysia, Cyberjaya: Universiti Islam Malaysia.Google Scholar
  2. Ahilemah, Jonet (1981) “Aspek Perkahwinan dan Perceraian: Harta, nafkah dan warisan – undang-undang Islam”, paper presented at the Seminar Wanita dan Undang-Undang, organised by University Women’s Association, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 24–26 August.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, Ibrahim (1986) “Undang-Undang Kekeluargaan Islam Yang Baru”, paper presented at Seminar Perundangan Islam, organised by Abim, Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, 24 August.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad Ibrahim (1965) Islamic Law in Malaya, Singapore: Malaysian Sociological Research Institute Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Asmah, Haji Omar (1978) “Poligami”, paper presented at Seminar Pentadbiran Undang-Undang Syariah Jenayah dan Keluarga in Kedah, 28–30 April.Google Scholar
  6. Berita Harian (2014) “Jaij tidak cadang tambah tempoh kursus praperkahwinan”, 16 November.Google Scholar
  7. ——— (2018) “Modul baharu kursus perkahwinan akan diperkenal”, 3 August.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Judith (1988) “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory”, Theatre Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell, RW (2008) “Gender as a Social Practice”, in Steven Seidman and Jeffrey C Alexander (eds) The New Social Theory Reader (Second Edition), London and New York: Routledge, 369–375.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, Miriam (2007) “The Muslimwoman”, Contemporary Islam, Vol. 1, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Djamour, Judith (1959) Malay Kinship and Marriage in Singapore, London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, No. 21, London: University of London, The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dunn, Shannon and Rosemary B Kellison (2010) “At the Intersection of Scripture and Law: Qur’an 4:34 and violence against women”, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, Vol. 26, No. 2, 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farah, Madelain (trans.) (2012) Al-Ghazali: Marriage and Sexuality in Islam, Petaling Jaya: Islamic Book Trust.Google Scholar
  14. Feldman, G (2005) Development in Theory: Essential crises; a performative approach to migrants, minorities, and the European nation-state. Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 1, 213–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedland, Roger (2009) “The Endless Fields of Pierre Bourdieu”, Organization, Vol. 16, No. 6, 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geissinger, Aisha (2015) Gender and Muslim Constructions of Exegetical Authority: A rereading of the classical genre of Qur’an commentary, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hafiz, Yatim (2018) “Apex court rules in favour of Indira Gandhi in unilateral conversion case”, Malaysiakini, 29 January.Google Scholar
  18. Hijjas, Mulaika (2013) “Guides for Mrs Nawawi”, Indonesia and the Malay World, Vol. 41, No. 120, 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holland, Muhtar (trans.) (2012) Adab Al-Nikah: The proper conduct of marriage in Islam, Kuala Lumpur: Dar Al Wahi Publication.Google Scholar
  20. Horowitz, DL (1994) “The Qur’an and the Common Law: Islamic law reform and the theory of legal change”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 3, 543–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jakim (2008) Memasuki Gerbang Perkahwinan (Edisi Kedua), Putrajaya: Jabatan Kemajuan Islam.Google Scholar
  22. ——— (2012) Keputusan Muzakarah Jawatankuas Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia, Putrajaya: Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia.Google Scholar
  23. Karim, Wazir-Jahan (1987) “The Status of Malay Women in Malaysia: From culture to Islam and industrialization”, International Journal of Sociology of the Family, Vol. 17, No. 1, 41–55.Google Scholar
  24. ——— (1992) Women and Culture: Between adat and Islam, Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kuppusamy, Baradan (2004) “Call grow to declare marital rape a crime”, South China Morning Post, 24 August.Google Scholar
  26. Lamrabert, Asma (2018) Women and Men in the Quran, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malaysiakini (2014) “Indira fails to get IGP to execute court order”, 17 December.Google Scholar
  28. ——— (2018a) “What guarantee Prasana will be a practising Muslim under Indira?”, 1 February.Google Scholar
  29. ——— (2018b) “Perkasa: Ruling on child conversion not based on Islamic interpretation”, 30 January.Google Scholar
  30. ——— (2018c) “Indira Gandhi: Dear Harapan gov’t, IGP, is my daughter alive?”, 17 November.Google Scholar
  31. ——— (2019) “No new leads on Indira’s child, ex-husband, says Fuzi”, 26 February.Google Scholar
  32. Maznah, Mohamad (2011) “The Islamic Divorce Contract and a Flawed Axiom of Masculine Protectionism”, Asian Journal of Social Science, Vol. 39, 821–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ——— (2012) “Gender Battles and the Syariah: Translating Islamic marital law into everyday practice In Malaysia”, in Gavin Jones, Terrence Hull and Maznah Mohamad (eds), Changing Marriage Patterns in Southeast Asia: Economic and socio-cultural dimensions, London: Routledge, 171–184.Google Scholar
  34. McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (2001) (ed) Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, Brill Reference Online, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  35. Mir-Hosseini, Ziba (1993) Marriage on Trial: A study of Islamic family law, Iran and Morocco compared, London: IB Tauris and Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Mohd Siddiq, Azani (2016) “Let Indira hug all her children again”, Malaysiakini 30 April.Google Scholar
  37. Muslihah Hasbullah @ Abdullah, Najibah Mohd Zin’ and Saodah Wok (2009) “Relationships between Satisfaction of Muslim Women on Financial Supports After Divorce and Ex-Husbands’ Compliance to the Supports with Post-Divorce Welfare”, Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, Vol. 17, No. 2, 153–166.Google Scholar
  38. Nafisah, M (2005) “Mystified over law’s aim”, New Straits Times Online, http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/nst/Friday/Letters/200512300, accessed 30 May 2009.
  39. New Straits Times (1995a) “The main causes of marital break-ups”, 16 February.Google Scholar
  40. ——— (1995b) “When divorce is inevitable”, 16 February.Google Scholar
  41. ——— (1995c) “Enforcement chief swore to destroy Talib, says wife”, 12 April.Google Scholar
  42. ——— (1995d) “Local Syariah court has no right, says accused”, 17 May.Google Scholar
  43. ——— (1995e) “Be wary of Syiah teachings, says FT delegate”, 27 November.Google Scholar
  44. ——— (1995f) “Islamic course on family harmony”, 8 May.Google Scholar
  45. ——— (1995g) “Longer marriage courses to create better Islamic families”, 15 May.Google Scholar
  46. ——— (1996a) “Dr Siti Hasmah saddened by polygamy ruling”, 28 October.Google Scholar
  47. ——— (1996b) “For women, a step backwards”, 21 October.Google Scholar
  48. ——— (1997) “programmes against moral decay to be streamlined”, 25 February.Google Scholar
  49. ——— (2002) “Don’t blame pre-marital courses for rise in incest”, 24 April.Google Scholar
  50. ——— (2003a) “Campaign provokes objection from religious leaders”, 20 March.Google Scholar
  51. ——— (2003b) “Campaign not intended to question Syariah”, 19 March.Google Scholar
  52. ——— (2004a) “Amend code to include marital rape”, 22 August.Google Scholar
  53. ——— (2004b) “Suhakam under fire over marital rape proposal”, 23 August.Google Scholar
  54. Ng, Cecilia (1999) “Gender and the Changing Division of Labour in a Rural Community”, in Cecilia Ng (ed) Positioning Women in Malaysia: Class and gender in an industrializing State, London: Macmillan Press, 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ng, Cecilia, Maznah Mohamad and tan beng hui (2006) Feminism and the Women’s Movement in Malaysia: An unsung (r)evolution, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Nik Noriani, Nik Badli Shah (ed) (2003) Islamic Family Law and Justice for Muslim Women. Kuala Lumpur: Sisters in Islam.Google Scholar
  57. Nock, Steven L (2005) “Marriage as a Public Issue”, The Future of Children, Vol. 15, No. 2, Autumn, 13–32.Google Scholar
  58. O’Neill, John (1986) “The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peletz, Michael (1988) A Share of the Harvest: Kinship, property, and social history among the Malays of Rembau, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. ——— (2002) Islamic Modern: Religious courts and cultural politics in Malaysia, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Quah, SR (2009) Families in Asia: Home and kin, London and New York: Routledge (Second Edition).Google Scholar
  62. Roded, Ruth (2001) “Women and the Qurʾān”, Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed), Georgetown University, Washington DC et al., Brill Reference Online,Google Scholar
  63. Ruhil Hayati, binti M Busra (2011) “Modul Kursus Praperkahwinan Islam: Kajian terhadap keberkesanannya di Jabatan Agama Islam Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan”, MA thesis, University of Malaya.Google Scholar
  64. Sharifah Zaleha, Syed Hassan and Cederroth, Sven (1997) Managing Marital Disputes in Malaysia: Islamic mediators and conflict resolution in the syariah courts, Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  65. Siti Nurbaiyah, Nadzmi and Adie Suri Zulkefli (2011), “‘Catching’ men who weasel out”, New Straits Times (Malaysia), 20 June.Google Scholar
  66. Siti Zubaidah, Ismail, Ilhaamie Abdul Ghani Azmi and Zulfikri Yasoa (2011) “Justice delayed is justice denied?: Divorce case management in Malaysian Shariah court”, Proceedings International Conference on Management (ICM), 977–987.Google Scholar
  67. Stivens, Maila (1996) Matriliny and Modernity: Sexual politics and social change in rural Malaysia, St Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  68. Stowasser, Barbara Freyer (1997) Women in the Qur’an, Traditions and Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor, EN (1937), “Malay Family Law”, Journal Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. XV, Part 1, 1–78.Google Scholar
  70. The Star Online (2007a) “Rubber tapper wins custody”, 4 May.Google Scholar
  71. ——— (2007b) “Be guided by compassion and wisdom”, 10 May.Google Scholar
  72. The Straits Times (1994) “S’porean with 10 wives charged in Johor”, April 21.Google Scholar
  73. ——— “Cautioned statement allowed as evidence”, 25 November.Google Scholar
  74. ——— (1995a) “Course on marriage may be resumed in schools”, 22 February.Google Scholar
  75. ——— (1995b) “Accused says man’s 10 wives committed no sin”, 14 February.Google Scholar
  76. ——— (1995c) “Get to the point, judge tells accused”, 24 March.Google Scholar
  77. ——— (1995d) “KL may make marriage course mandatory for Muslims”, 17 February.Google Scholar
  78. ——— (1996) “Sunni-Shi’ite schism in Malaysia: Why?”, 12 May.Google Scholar
  79. ——— (2003) “Muftis hit out at ‘one husband, one wife’ initiative”, 19 March.Google Scholar
  80. Thayaparan, S (2018) “Indira Gandhi case – how reality conflicts with claims of moderation”, Malaysiakini, 31 January.Google Scholar
  81. ——— (2019) “Those who believe they are saving Indira Gandhi’s daughter”, Malaysiakini, 25 February.Google Scholar
  82. Utusan Online (2015) “Modul kursus kahwin disemak setiap 5 tahun – Jakim”, 22 September.Google Scholar
  83. Wadud, Amina (1999) Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. White, Sally (2006) “Gender and the Family”, in Greg Fealy and Virginia Matheson (eds) Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: A contemporary sourcebook, Singapore: ISEAS, 273–352.Google Scholar
  85. Winstedt, RO (1945) “Old Malay Digests and Malay Customary Law”, The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 1, April, 17–29.Google Scholar
  86. Wong, Chee Tuck (2016) “What Indira thinks today, Malaysia shall think tomorrow”, Malaysiakini, 18 January.Google Scholar
  87. Visvanathan, Thanam (1995) “Jail, fine for man and his 10 wives”, New Straits Times, 13 July.Google Scholar
  88. Yegar, Moshe (1979) Islam and Islamic Institutions in British Malaya: Policies and implementation, Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  89. Young, Iris Marion (2003) “The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state”. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zainah, Anwar (2001) “What Islam, whose Islam? Sisters in Islam and the struggle for women’s rights”, in RW Heffner (ed), The Politics of Multiculturalism: Pluralism and citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 227–252.Google Scholar
  91. ——— (2006) “Stemming the ‘I divorce you’ trend”, New Straits Times, 6 October.Google Scholar
  92. ——— (2008) “Advocacy for Reform in Islamic Family Law: The experience of Sisters in Islam” in Asifa Quraishi and Frank E Vogel (eds), The Islamic Marriage Contract: Case studies in Islamic family law, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Islamic Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law School, 275–284.Google Scholar
  93. Zamri, bin Ghazali (2011) “Konsep Perkahwinan Mengikut Syeikh Daud bin Abdullah Al-Fatani Dalam Kitab Idah Al-Albab”, MA thesis, University of Malaya.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Malay Studies and Department of Southeast Asian Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations