Toward the Semantic Data Inter-processing: A Semantic Web Approach and Its Services

  • Anand KumarEmail author
  • B. P. Singh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 100)


Semantic data and information make the applications and its services intelligent by providing reasoning mechanism and inter-processing capability of data and information. Semantic Web research communities have developed standard and more complex use-cases applications that need semantic data inter-processing for better utilization of data and information. Currently, Semantic Web is frequently used to develop the innovative applications in various areas with unbelievable benefits and services, and people quickly agree to adopt the upgraded technology. Hence, this paper will broadly explain the Semantic Web and its supporting technology with their applications and benefits. We will also introduce here about the Web services that will be utilized for the development of innovative applications in various areas which will relay the innovative services to applications developers and users.


Semantic Web Web services Knowledge construction Semantic data inter-processing Web-based applications 


  1. 1.
    Feldmann S, Herzig SJI, Kernschmidt K, Wolfenstetter T, Kammerl D, Qamar A, Lindemann U, Krcmar H, Paredis CJJ, Vogel-Heuser B (2015) Towards effective management of inconsistencies in model-based engineering of automated production systems. In: IFAC symposium on information control in manufacturingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fensel D, Bussler C, Ding Y, Kartseva A Klein V, Korotkiy M, Omelayenko M, Siebes R (2002) Semantic Web application areas. In: Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on applications of natural language to information systems. Stockholm, Sweden, June 2002, pp 27–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klein M, Visser U (2004) Semantic Web challenge 2003. In: IEEE intelligent system. IEEE Computer Society, pp 31–33Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee T (2000) Semantic Web-XML2000.
  6. 6.
    Daconta M, Obrst L, Smith K (2003) The Semantic Web: a guide to the future of XML, web services, and knowledge management. Wiley, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Misra DC (2006) Ten emerging E-government challenges today: the future may be sober and not hype, keynote address. In: 4th international conference on E-governance. Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi. In: Sahu GP (ed) (2006) Delivering E-government, New Delhi, Gift Publishing, Global Institute of Flexile Systems Management, 15 Dec 2006, pp 6–14 (Chapter 2)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erl T (2007) SOA principles of service design. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McIlraith S, Son T, Zeng H (2001) Semantic Web services. IEEE Intell Syst 16:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin D, Burstein M, Hobbs J, Lassila O, Mcdermott D, Mcilraith S, Paolucci M, Parsia B, Payne T, Sirin E, Srinivasan N, Sycara K (2004) OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services. W3C Member Submission.
  11. 11.
    Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, Boley H, Tabet S, Grosof B, Dean M (2004) SWRL: a Semantic Web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission.
  12. 12.
    Kopecky J, Roman D, Moran M, Fensel D (2006) Semantic Web services grounding. In: Advanced international conference on telecommunications and international conference on internet and web applications and services (AICT-ICIW’06), Guadelope, French Caribbean, p 127Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fensel D, Lausen H, Polleres A, De Bruijn J, Stollberg M, Roman D, Domingue J (2007) Enabling Semantic Web services: the web service modeling ontology. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roman D, Lausen H, Keller U (2006) Web service modeling ontology (WSMO). WSMO working draft.
  15. 15.
    Fensel D, Bussler C (2002) The web service modeling framework WSMF. Electron Commer Res Appl 1:113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akkiraju R, Farrell J, Miller J, Nagarajan M, Schmidt MT, Sheth A, Verma K (2005) Web service semantics—WSDL-S. W3C Member Submission.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Sivashanmugam K, Verma K, Sheth A, Miller J (2003) Adding semantics to web services standards. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on web services (ICWS)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farrell J, Lausen H (2007) Semantic annotations for WSDL and XML schema. W3C recommendation.
  20. 20.
    Akkiraju R, Sapkota B, Semantic annotations for WSDL and XML schema-usage guide. Working group note.
  21. 21.
    Vitvar T, Kopecky J, Viskova J, Fensel D (2008) WSMO-lite annotations for web services. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Semantic Web conferenceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheth A (2003) Semantic Web process lifecycle: role of semantics in annotation, discovery, composition and orchestrationGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Richardson L, Ruby S (2007) RESTful web services. O’reilly Media, IncGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maleshkova M, Kopecký J, Pedrinaci C (2009) Adapting SAWSDL for semantic annotations of RESTful services. In: Workshop: beyond SAWSDL at on the move federated conferences & workshopsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lathem J, Gomadam K, Sheth A (2007) SA-REST and (S)mashups: adding semantics to RESTful services. ICSC’07: proceedings of the international conference on semantic computingGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Connolly D (ed) (2007) Gleaning resource descriptions from dialects of languages (GRDDL). W3C recommendation.
  27. 27.
    Adida B, Birbeck M, Mccarron S, Pemberton S (eds) (2008) RDFa in XHTML: syntax and processing. W3C recommendation.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information SciencesJ. R. Handicapped UniversityChitrakootIndia
  2. 2.Dayalbagh Educational InstituteAgraIndia

Personalised recommendations