The Factors Deciding about the Popularity of Kayaking Tourism on Industrial Areas

  • Jaroslaw CholewaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 171)


Kayaking tourism is one of the forms of active tourism. Despite the existence of extensive literature on various aspects of tourist demand, few publications touch upon the matter with respect to kayaking tourism. This topic is particularly important for the Śląskie Voivodeship, which is most often depicted as an industrialized area with a high level of degradation of the natural environment. The objective of the paper was to identify the demand factors for the kayaking tourism. The method used in the study was that of diagnostic survey with a questionnaire prepared by the authors of the paper based on the literature, verified in terms of validity and reliability. The study was carried out during nationwide kayaking trips organised within the Śląskie Voivodeship. The analyzes were carried out separately according to the gender and age of the respondents. The analyses indicated that the most important factor determining the demand for the kayaking tourism (both among women and men) was the purity of rivers, while cultural (cultural) factors were the least important. The age of the respondents diversified the demand factors, but the purity of the rivers was dominant in all age groups. On this basis, we concluded that there was a need to take further measures in order to restore the purity of rivers in the area of the Śląskie Voivodeship, which may result in an increase of the demand for kayaking tourism in the studied area.


Kayaking Tourism Śląskie Voivodeship Conditions Canoeing Demand 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pulido-Fernandes JL, Cardenas-Garcia PJ (2019) Does environmental sustainability contribute to tourism growth? An analysis at the country level. J Clean Prod 213. 309-319.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pintillii RD, Peptenatu D, Merciu CF, Drăghici CC; Cercleux AL (2012) The functional restructuring in the urban-rural interface of the capital, by the development of touristic activities. Geo Journal of Tourism & Geosites 9(1). 120-129.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tourism Development Programme until 2020 (Tourism_Development_Programme_until_2020787c.pdf) (20.07.2019).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Svatava N, Marie B, Hana I (2016) Management of implementation of water tourism for youth in Czech Republik. Ovidius Unoversity Annals, Series Physical Education & Sport/Science 16. 590-598.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mynarski W, Cholewa J, Rozpara M, Borek Z, Strojek K, Nawrocka A (2015) Rekommandation for health-enhancing physical activities in type 2 diabetes patients. J PHYS THER SCI 27(8). 2419-2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galvis-Rivera N, (2018) Turismo Fluvial: Una Alternativa Para Fomentar La Actividad Turística en Los Municipios Ribereños Al Río Magdalena. El Caso Del Municipio De Suárez (Tolima, Colombia). Anuario Turismo y Sociedad 23. 149-182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Participation in sport and physical recreation in 2016 (Participation_in_sport_and_physical_recreation_in_2016.pdf)(25.09.2019).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazur L. (1997), Locja kajakowa. PZK, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rafalska B, Cholewa J, Tomik R (2017) Factors determining kayak tourism in the Silesian Provence. Folia Turistica 45. 63-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spatial Development Plan of the Silesian Voivodship “Plan 2020+” ( (20.09.2016).
  12. 12.
    Caspersen CJ, Merritt RK, Stephens T (1994) International physical activity patterns: A methodological perspective, [w:] Dishmen R.K., red., Advances in exercise adherence, Champaign, Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buckworth J, Dishman RK. (2002) Exercise psychology. Champaign, Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dishman RK et al. (2005), Self-management strategies mediate self-efficacy and physical activity, Am J Prev Med 29(10). 10-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sjöström M. Oja P. Hagströmer M. Smith BJ. Bauman A. (2006) Healthenhancing physical activity across European Union countries, the Eurobarometer study. J Public Health 14(5). 291-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seohee C. Gibson HJ (2011) Physically Active Leisure and Tourism Connection, Leisure Involvement and Choice of Tourism Activities Among Paddlers, Leisure Sciences 33(2). 162-181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tekin A (2004) Sport tourism – an animation perspective. J Sport and Tourism 9(4). 317-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walker GJ. Virden RJ (2005) Constraints on outdoor recreation [in:] Jackson E., ed., Constraints to leisure, State College, PA: Venture Publishing, 201–219.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Absalon D. Matysik M (2007), Changes in water quality and runoff in the Upper Oder River Basin, Geomorphology 92(3/4). 106-118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Golja A. Arnež U. Petrovič D (2012) Visualization of the soča river section and water flow modelling for kayaking. GeographiaTechnica 15(1). 28-35.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duncan MJ. Spence JC. Mummery WK (2005) Perceived environment and physical activity, A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2(11).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sallis JF. Cervero RB. Ascher W. Henderson KA. Kraft MK. Kerr J (2006) An ecological approach to creating active living. Annu Rev Public Health 27(1). 297-322.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Owen N. Humpel N. Leslie E. Bauman A. Sallis JF. (2005) Understanding environmental influences on walking, Review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 27(1). 67-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stahl T. Rütten A. Nutbeam D. Bauman A. Kannas L. Abel T. Lüschen G. Rodriquez DJ. Vinck J. van der Zee J (2004), The importance of the social environment for physical active lifestyle, Results from an international study. Soc Sci Med 52(1). 1-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim K. Beck JA. (2009) Exploring Leisure Trip Behaviors of University Women Students, An Investigation of Push and Pull Motivational Models. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management 18. 386-405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gibson H. (1998) Active sport tourism: who participates? Leisure Studies 17(2). 155-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical EducationKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations