Digital Rights Management Dilemma: Theoretical Context



Since the emergence of human beings, it is proved that their life has been changed gently from every single aspect. Humans’ wisdom witnesses the rapid development of the whole society that provides a platform for people’s evergreen concern about the relationship between their intellectual output and economic income. The increasingly growing focus upon the private property interest first appeared with its original intention of safeguarding feudal hierarchy. At the beginning of intellectual property system development, the nobles spared no efforts to strive for their private benefit in all fields, especially in culture and knowledge area, which is accepted by the general public to be the origin of intellectual property regime.


  1. 1.
    Williams R (1985) Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu PK (2012) The Confucian challenge to intellectual property reforms. WIPO J. Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-37Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geller PE (2000) Copyright history and the future: what’s culture got to do with it? J Copyr Soc USA 47:211Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Havelock EA (1963) Preface to plato. Blackwell, pp 93–94Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hearn G, Mandeville T, Joseph R (2003) Public policy in knowledge-based economies: foundations and frameworks - new horizons in public policy series. New horizons in public policy Series. Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vanderburg WH (1985) Technology, society, and culture, a framework for understanding. Technol Soc 7:414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quintanilla MA (2000) Tolerance and technological culture. Philosophica 66(2):65–71Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dusek V (1993) Philosophy of technology: an introduction. Paragon House, New York, p 50Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bates BJ, Liu T (2010) A cultural approach to DRM implementation in China. Westminst Pap Commun Cult 7(1):7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Potter PB (2005) The Chinese legal system globalization and local legal culture. Taylor and Francis e-LibraryGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Redfield R, Linton R, Herskovits MJ (1936) Memorandum for the study of acculturation, American anthropology, 1921–1945: Papers from the American Anthropologist. University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cabassa LJ (2003) Measuring acculturation: where we are and where we need to go. Hispanic J Behav Sci 25(2):127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Padilla AM, Perez W (2003) Acculturation, social identity, and social cognition: a new perspective. Hispanic J Behav Sci 25(1):35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nikolic D (2011) Legal culture and legal transplant, Serbian Report. Isaidat Law Rev 1(1)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maskus KE (2000) Intellectual property rights in the global economy. The Peterson Institute for International EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zheng C (2004) Intellectual property law: a number of research focal points at the beginning of the new century. China Law Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhiping L (1999) The past, current and future of Chinese law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spence M (2007) Intellectual property. Clarendon Law Series, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li L (2010) How has Chinese traditional culture an impact on China’s intellectual property legal system? Would this influence be a problem in the protection of folklore by the intellectual property legal system?. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci 5:15Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Handong W (2007) A cultural explanation of composition and transfer of IP law. China Legal Sci, 6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Handong W (2005) Essential issues research on intellectual property. Renmin University Press, p 64Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cover RM (1993) Narrative, violence, and the law: the essays of Robert cover. University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhu N (2005) A case of legal transplant: the possibility of efficient breach in China. Georgetown J Int Law 36:1145Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allison JR, Lin L (1999) The evolution of Chinese attitudes toward property rights invention and discovery. Univ Pa J Int Econ Law 20Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Woodard JW (1934) Critical notes on the culture lag concept. Soc Force 12(3):388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brinkman RL, Brinkman JE (1997) Cultural lag: conception and theory. Int J Soc Econ 24(6):609–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sahay (1997, Summer) Cybermaterialism’ and the invention of the cyber-cultural everyday. New Literary Hist 28(3)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sansone C, Morf CC, Panter AT (2004) The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology. Sage Publications Inc, p 119Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. General Learning Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bandara A (1978) The self-system in reciprocal determinism. Am Psychol 33:344–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bandara A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37:122–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Magnani P, Montagnani ML (2008) Digital rights management systems and competition: what developments within the much debated interface between intellectual property and competition law? Int Rev Intell Prop Compet Law 39:83Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Solove DJ (2004) Digital person: technology and privacy in the information age. Law, Technology and Society, Ex MachinaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiser PJ (2003) Internet, innovation, and intellectual property policy. Column Law Rev 103:534. Available at: Accessed 14 Aug 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eckersley P (2004) Virtual markets for virtual goods: the mirror image of digital copyright? Harv J Law Tech 18:85Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Drahos P (1996) A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth Publishing Company, p 4Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Melendez-Ortiz R, Roffe P (2009) Intellectual property and sustainable development: development Agendas in a changing world (Elgar Intellectual Property and Global Development). In: Edward Elgar Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Samuelson P (1999) Intellectual property and the digital economy: why the anti-circumvention regulations need to be revised. Berkeley Technol Law J 14:519Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tang M (2008) Application of digital right management in music area. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.
  40. 40.
    Favale M (2014) Death and resurrection of copyright between law and technology. Inf Commun Technol Law 23(2):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tran JL (2016) A primer on digital rights management technologies. In: Chapter 3 in digital rights managements: a librarian’s guide, August 17, 2015. Scarecrow PressGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cahir J (2007) The structure of control communication system and copyright law. In: Westkamp G (ed) Emerging issues in intellectual property trade, technology, and market freedom: essays in honor of Herchel Smith. Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Solum LB (2005) The future of copyright. Tex Law Rev 83:1137Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mazziotti G (2008) EU digital copyright law and the end-user. Springer, Berlin, p 4Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liu Q, Safavi-Naini R, Sheppard NP (2003) Digital rights management for content distribution. In: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series; Vol. 34, Adelaide, Australia, pp 49–58Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vathitphund T (2010) Access to knowledge difficulties in developing countries: a balanced access to copyrighted works in the digital environment. Int Rev Law Comput Technol 24(1):9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Franklin JA, Morris RJ (2002) Symposium on constructing international intellectual property law: the role of national courts: international jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in the era of global networks: irrelevance of, goals for, and comments on the current proposals. Chicago-Kent Law Rev, 1213Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    O’Connor SM (2015) Creators, innovators, and appropriation mechanisms. George Mason Law Rev 22(4):973–1000Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Guillermo N, Babak F, Rissanen S (2003) Constrained delegation in XML-based access control and digital rights management standards. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Communication, Network, and Information Security, New York, NY, United States. International Association of Science and Technology for DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    CheunNgen C, Ricardo C, Jeroen D (2006) LicenseScript: a logical language for digital rights management. Annales des Telecommun 61(3):284–331Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wei X, Jinpeng H, Yunhao L (2005) Access control policy negotiation for remote hot-deployed grid services. In: The First International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, Melbourne, Australia. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer SocietyGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Piero B, Daniel O (2007) Rule-based policy representation and reasoning for the semantic web. In: Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Dresden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Guo Q, Zhang M (2009) A novel approach for multi-agent-based intelligent manufacturing system. Inf Sci 179:3029–3090Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Xu H, Brussel HV (1997) A behaviour-based blackboard architecture for reactive and efficient task execution of an autonomous robot. Robot Autonom Syst 22(2):115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tanenbaum AS (1996) Computer networks, 3nd edn. Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bin Z, Min F, Shipeng L (2005) Secure key management for flexible digital rights management of scalable codestreams. In: IEEE 7th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jiang Z, Bin L, ShiQiang Y (2005) FLMP: a flexible license management protocol for digital rights management. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. International Society for Optical Engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Roberte G, Rosa G (2006) An OWL copyright ontology for semantic digital rights management. In: Lecture notes in bioinformatics. Springer, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stamp M (2003) Digital rights management: the technology behind the hype. J Electronic Commerce Res 4(3). Accessed 14 Aug 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cong Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.Law SchoolShanghai UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations