Major Influencing Factors of Decision About Alternative Technical Means in Selected Aviation Services

  • Eugeniusz PiechoczekEmail author
  • Andrzej Hawryluk
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The paper presents general assumptions and continued results of the studies on theoretical and practical aspects of providing selected services with alternative technical means. The study purpose was based on SWOT analyses and research within customers and suppliers. The specificity of the assumptions in the selected areas was illustrated on the basis of examples of completed undertakings. Additionally, the article contains a list of examined factors influencing the adaptation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems as components of the model of conversion of services that could have an impact on decision-making in terms of applications of alternative air platforms. Specific conditions for the chosen area induce the building of the base of rules and the base of knowledge in the range of applying the alternative technical means. It will be essential to preparation of the standards of the approximate inference leaning on insecure or incomplete knowledge. The article bring forward the preliminary results of research and development in this area.


Aviation Service provision effectiveness Unmanned aircraft services Air services Remotely piloted aircraft systems 


  1. ANAC National Civil Aviation Agency (2019) Brazil drone and meteorology, DOC—1009—Manual on remotely piloted aircraft systems (PSURs), ICAOGoogle Scholar
  2. Engineering of Needs (EoN) The role of identifying and analyzing needs in Engineering and Engineering Management.
  3. European Aviation Safety Agency EASA (2019) Concept of operations for drones a risk based approach to regulation of unmanned aircraft. BrochureGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaźmierczak J (2009) Innovation: determinants and prospects in terms of Polish, computer-integrated management, under editorhip Ryszard Knosala, tom I, Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją, OpoleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaźmierczak J (2012) Evaluation of the social impacts of innovative products and technologies (“Technology Assessment”). Politechnika Śląska inauguration lectureGoogle Scholar
  6. Kołodziejczyk A (2011) Basic of artificial inteligence Podstawy sztucznej inteligencji—wykład. Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w SzczecineGoogle Scholar
  7. Kozuba J, Krasuski K (2018) Aircraft velocity determination using GLONASS data. In: 22nd International scientific conference. Transport Means, Trakai, LithuaniaGoogle Scholar
  8. Marszałek A (2018) Wnioskowanie oparte na wiedzy niepewnej Opracowane na podstawie materiałów dra Michała Berety, Inżynieria wiedzy. Politechnika KrakowskaGoogle Scholar
  9. Piechoczek E, Kaźmierczak J (2016) Evaluation of application of alternative technical measures in providing selected air services. Politechnika Warszawska, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  10. Shakhatreh H, Sawalmeh A, Al-Fuqaha A, Dou Z, Almaita E, Khalil I, Othman Noor S, Khreishah A, Guizani M (2018) Unmanned aerial vehicles: a survey on civil applications and key research challengesGoogle Scholar
  11. Skowronek C, Sarjusz-Wolski Z (1999) Logistyka w przedsiębiorstwie. PWEGoogle Scholar
  12. Torun E (1999) UAV requirements and design consideration. In: RTO SCI symposium on warfare automation: procedures and techniques for unmanned vehicles, Ankara, Turkey published in RTO MP-44Google Scholar
  13. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. ELSEVIER Inf Sci 8(3):199–249MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aviation Technology DepartmentSilesian University of TechnologyKatowicePoland
  2. 2.Air Traffic Safety and Crisis Management Centre, Polish Air Navigation Services AgencyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations