Advertisement

Safety Leadership Functions Using Complexity Science

  • John Ojuola
  • Sherif Mostafa
  • Sherif MohamedEmail author
Conference paper
  • 78 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In order to put a proactive approach in place with regards to the prevention of workplace injuries, there is a lean towards the main determinants of safety; e.g. leadership. As a result of their vital role in organisations, leaders are seen as prime players in the creation of safe work environments. However, leadership is a complex, multi-phased concept which advocates that various leadership styles affect the outcome of safety in diverse ways. Therefore, this paper highlighted that complex systems predominantly focus on the relationship amongst teams, behavioural patterns and the interdependencies within an evolving system. Thus, applying the same concept to safety and leadership provided direction in practice and presented an unorthodox leadership construct that would enable managers to imbibe leadership apt for the twenty-first century. The aim of this paper was to develop a framework for safety leadership functions using complexity science. This study was centred on literature review based on the following themes—leadership style, complexity leadership theory and safety leadership. Discussions on the study carried out was presented, followed by a framework for safety leadership. This paper concluded that complexity science supports the flexibility, innovative and dynamism of leadership; not as a set of capabilities or standards innate in any one person.

Keywords

Complexity leadership theory Leadership style Safety leadership 

References

  1. Baltaci A, Balci A (2017) Complexity leadership: a theorical perspective. Int J Educ Lead Manag 5(1):30–58Google Scholar
  2. Barling J, Loughlin C, Kelloway EK (2002) Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 87(3):488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard C (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol 88(2):207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burpo FJ (2006) The great captains of chaos: developing adaptive leaders. Mil Rev 86(1):64Google Scholar
  7. Castells M (2003) The power of identity: the information age: economy, society and culture, vol 2. The Information AgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ (2009) Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 94(5):1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cilliers P (1999) ‘Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems’ Reply to David Spurrett. S Afr J Phil 18(2):275–278Google Scholar
  10. Cilliers P (2005) Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory Cult Soc 22(5):255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke S (2013) Safety leadership: a meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. J Occup Organ Psychol 86(1):22–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conchie SM, Donald IJ (2009) The moderating role of safety-specific trust on the relation between safety-specific leadership and safety citizenship behaviours. J Occup Health Psychol 14(2):137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conner DR (1998) Leading at the edge chaos. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Coveney PV (2003) Self-organisation and complexity: a new age for theory, computation and experiment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 361(1807):1057–1079MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Koster RB, Stam D, Balk BM (2011) Accidents happen: the influence of safety-specific transformational leadership, safety consciousness, and hazard reducing systems on warehouse accidents. J Oper Manag 29(7–8):753–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flin R, Yule S (2004) Leadership for safety: industrial experience. BMJ Qual Saf 13(2):45–51Google Scholar
  17. Griffin MA, Neal A (2000) Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 5(3):347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmeister K, Gibbons AM, Johnson SK, Cigularov KP, Chen PY, Rosecrance JC (2014) The differential effects of transformational leadership facets on employee safety. Saf Sci 62:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP (2004) The role of leadership in safety. Psychol Work Saf 159–180Google Scholar
  20. Inness M, Turner N, Barling J, Stride CB (2010) Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: a within-person, between-jobs design. J Occup Health Psychol 15(3):279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelloway EK, Mullen J, Francis L (2006) Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. J Occup Health Psychol 11(1):76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kontopoulos KM (2006) The logics of social structure, vol 6. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewin K, Lippitt R, White RK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. J Soc Psychol 10(2):269–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lichtenstein BB, Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, Seers A, Orton JD, Schreiber C (2006) Complexity leadership theory: an interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emerg Complex Organ 2–12Google Scholar
  25. Marion R (2008) Complexity theory for organisations and organisational leadership. Complex Lead 1:1–15Google Scholar
  26. Marion R, Uhl-Bien M (2001) Leadership in complex organisations. Lead Q 12(4):389–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mullen JE, Kelloway EK (2009) Safety leadership: a longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes. J Occup Organ Psychol 82(2):253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mumford MD, Bedell-Avers KE, Hunter ST (2008) Planning for innovation: a multi-level perspective. In: Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 107–154Google Scholar
  29. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (2011) Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol 96(1):71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM (2000) The impact of organisational climate on safety climate and individual behaviour. Saf Sci 34(1–3):99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ojuola J, Mostafa S, Mohamed S (2018) Construction safety leadership: a complexity perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on construction project management and construction engineering (iCCPMCE-2018), 03–06 Dec 2018, Sydney, Australia, pp 104–109Google Scholar
  32. Selznick P (1948) Foundations of the theory of organisation. Am Sociol Rev 13(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 85(11):68Google Scholar
  34. Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, McKelvey B (2007) Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Lead Q 18(4):298–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zohar D (1980) Safety climate in industrial organisations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 65(1):96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zohar D (2002) The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. J Organ Behav 23(1):75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zohar D (2014) Safety climate: conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. In: The Oxford handbook of organisational climate and culture, pp 317–334Google Scholar
  38. Zohar D, Tenne-Gazit O (2008) Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: a social network analysis. J Appl Psychol 93(4):744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Built EnvironmentGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations