Advertisement

ENMPC Versus PID Control Strategies Applied to a Quadcopter

  • Nadia MiladiEmail author
  • Taoufik Ladhari
  • Salim Hadj Said
Chapter
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 270)

Abstract

Trajectory tracking is a necessary function for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). In this context, we investigate in this chapter the path following problems for the quadcopter dynamic system, which is coupled, underactuated and highly nonlinear. We adopt the Newton–Euler approach to describe the quadcopter model. Two continuous time strategies of control are presented to solve this issue: the technique based on cascade proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers and the explicit nonlinear model predictive control (ENMPC) technique. A comparison through numerical simulations, between the performances resulting from these two control strategies in terms of helical trajectory tracking, shows that the ENMPC technique is more effectiveness than the technique based on the PID controllers.

Keywords

Quadcopter system Cascade PID Explicit NMPC Trajectory tracking 

References

  1. 1.
    Bouabdallah, S., Murrieri, P., Siegwart, R.: Design and control of an indoor micro quadrotor. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 4393–4398 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ganga, G., Dharmana, M.M.: MPC controller for trajectory tracking control of quadcopter. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Sasthamcotta, Kollam, Kerala, India, pp. 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoffmann, G., Huang, H., Waslander, S., Tomlin, C.: Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: theory and experiment. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, p. 6461 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Islam, M., Okasha, M., Idres, M.M.: Trajectory tracking in quadrotor platform by using PD controller and LQR control approach. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 1–7 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee, D., Kim, H.J., Sastry, S.: Feedback linearization vs. adaptive sliding mode control for a quadrotor helicopter. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 7, 419–428 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu, C., Chen, W.H., Andrews, J.: Tracking control of small-scale helicopters using explicit nonlinear MPC augmented with disturbance observers. Control Eng. Pract. 20, 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, H., Li, D., Zuo, Z., Zhong, Y.: Robust three-loop trajectory tracking control for quadrotors with multiple uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 63, 2263–2274 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raffo, G.V., Ortega, M.G., Rubio, F.R.: An integral predictive/nonlinear \(H_\infty \) control structure for a quadrotor helicopter. Automatica 46, 29–39 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rios, H., Falcon, R., Gonzalez, O.A., Dzul, A.E.: Continuous sliding-modes control strategies for quad-rotor robust tracking: real-time application. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, Y., Guo, Y., Pan, X., Sun, C.: Robust backstepping tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with application to quadrotor UAVs. In: International Conference on Information and Automation, Lijiang, China, pp. 2868–2873 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia Miladi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Taoufik Ladhari
    • 1
  • Salim Hadj Said
    • 1
  1. 1.Departement of Electrical EngineeringNational Engineering School of Monastir, LA2SEMonastirTunisia

Personalised recommendations