Advertisement

Acoustic Fatigue Research for Honeycomb Sandwich Structure with Impact Damage Based on Vibro-Acoustic Coupling Analysis

  • Ruowei Li
  • Haitao ZhaoEmail author
  • Mingqing Yuan
  • Ji’an Chen
Conference paper
  • 41 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 622)

Abstract

Composite honeycomb sandwich structure is widely used in aircraft wing leading edge, rudder surface, engine fairing, etc. It is susceptible to strong aerodynamic noise and impact loads from birds, hails, and stones. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the life of structure with sound and collision load. In this paper, an acoustic fatigue life evaluation method based on vibro-acoustic coupling with impact damage is proposed. A representative composite honeycomb sandwich structure is built up to implement the proposed method. Firstly, the low-velocity impact process is simulated by the finite element (FE) method. This analysis case is used to get the structure with damage and material degradation. Secondly, the FE model is linked with the acoustic indirect boundary element (BE) model. A white Gaussian noise load is applied to the coupled FE/indirect BE model, and the power spectral density (PSD) curve of the structural dangerous point is obtained by modal-based vibro-acoustic coupling response case and random post-processing analysis case. At last, the fatigue life of the honeycomb structure is computed by the PSD theory. The result shows that with the increase of the impact energy, the structural life under the same acoustic load decreases. This method reveals high computational efficiency and excellent feasibility. The analytical result has reference value for the acoustic and mechanical properties design of composite honeycomb sandwich structure.

Keywords

Vibro-acoustic coupling Low-velocity impact damage Acoustic fatigue 

References

  1. 1.
    Liu M, Wu Z (2016) Application of composite honeycomb sandwich structure in aircraft. Sci Technol Rev 34(8):21–25Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    White RG (1990) Developments in the acoustic fatigue design process for composite aircraft structures. Compos Struct 16(1):171–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(90)90071-LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaicaitis R (1987) Acoustic fatigue—a Monte Carlo approach. In: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 28th SDM Conference, Paper 87-0916l, Monterey, CA, April 1987.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1987-916
  4. 4.
    Zhao X, Jiang D, Zhang Q (2009) Application of rain-flow counting method in the analysis of load spectrum. Sci Technol Rev 27(3):67–73.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEOE-EQEC.2009.5194697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hong N (1991) A modified rainflow counting method. Int J Fatigue 13(6):465–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(91)90481-dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin Y, Li L (2003) Sonic fatigue life prediction of aeroengine structure. J Aerosp Power 18(3):373–377.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2003.03.013
  7. 7.
    Xu F, Xiao S (1996) The power spectral density method for the estimation of the sonic fatigue life. J Mech Strength (4):38–42Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang M (2009) Research on life analysis method for structure vibration fatigue. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics.  https://doi.org/10.7666/d.d076113
  9. 9.
    Tovo R (2002) Cycle distribution and fatigue damage under broad-band random loading. Int J Fatigue 24(11):1137–1147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00032-4CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abrate S (1998) Impact on composite structures. Low-Velocity Impact Damage (4):135–160.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511574504.005
  11. 11.
    Fangyu C, Li Z, Yihao T (2019) Damage and residual compressive strength of multi-layer composite laminates after low velocity impact. Int J Crashworthiness, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2018.1478925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bai C, Zhou J, Yan G (2011) Effects of sound field on thin-wall cylindrical structure dynamic characteristics. J Mech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.3901/jme.2011.05.078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng L (1994) Fluid-structural coupling of a plate-ended cylindrical shell: vibration and internal sound field. J Sound Vib 174(5):641–654.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1994.1299ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Craggs A (1979) Coupling of finite element acoustic absorption models. J Sound Vib 66(4):605–613ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reifsnider KL (1991) Fatigue of composite material. Compos Mater Series 4(1775):11–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2544-1_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tipping ME, Bishop CM (1999) Probabilistic principal component analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Statistical Methodology) 61(3):611–622.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063771017030071ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li Z, Zhan F (2010) Virtual lab acoustics acoustics simulation calculation advanced application example. National Defense Industry PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruowei Li
    • 1
  • Haitao Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mingqing Yuan
    • 1
  • Ji’an Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations