Advertisement

Introduction

  • Mingrui ShenEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

The recent national strategy of “rural revitalization” clearly demonstrates such central directives on rural issues. The state is regaining its leading role in rural governance by introducing package of state-led programs. To reach the research objectives, four questions are formulated in the study. (1) How does the process of intergovernmental politics evolve on rural program issues? (2) What is the mechanism behind the interplays between the state, private sector, and farmers in rural programs? (3) To what extent is the program-driven governance model a sustainable one? (4) Are there any new theoretical implications for rural revitalization, deriving from the state-led paradigm in China?

Keywords

Rural program Rural planning Rural governance Rural revitalization Sustainability 

References

  1. Chen A (2014) How has the abolition of agricultural taxes transformed village governance in China? Evidence from agricultural regions. China Q 219:715–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fei HT, Chang TI, Cooper PL, Redfield MP (1945) Earthbound China: A study of rural economy in Yunnan. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodwin M (1998) The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendas. J Rural Stud 14(1):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gu C (2001) The urban governance in the developing countries and its implication to China. Urban Plann Rev 25(9):13–20 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Kennedy J (2007) From the tax-for-fee reform to the abolition of agricultural taxes: the impact on township governments in north-west China. China Q 189:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Li LC (2007) Working for the peasants? Strategic interactions and unintended consequences in the Chinese rural tax reform. China J 57:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Luo X (2005) Inter-city cooperation and governance in the Yangtze River Delta Region. Doctor of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  8. Marks G, Scharpf FW, Schmitter PC, Streeck W (1996) Governance in the European Union. Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. O’brien KJ, Li L (2006) Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Qu J (2012) The project system: a new form of state governance. Soc Sci China 33(4):28–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rhodes RA (1996) The new governance: governing without government. Political Stud 44(4):652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shen J (2007) Scale, state and the city: urban transformation in post-reform China. Habitat Int 31(3):303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith G (2010) The hollow state: rural governance in China. China Q 203:601–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stoker G (1997) Public-private partnerships and urban governance. In: Pierre J (ed) Partners in urban governance: European and American experience. MacMillan, London, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  15. Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(155):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tan Q, Xin Q (2007) Village election and governance: do villagers care? J Contemp China 16(53):581–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. The International Food Policy Research Institute. (2019) 2019 Global Food Policy Report, Retrieved July 12, 2018 from https://www.ifpri.org/publication/2019-global-food-policy-report-synopsis
  18. Wang L (2014). Spatial planning and governance of five-year planning in China: case studies of the eleventh five-year planning in Jiangsu Province. Doctor of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  19. Woods M (2005) Rural geography: processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu Y (1996) Villager autonomy in rural China: Institution and Operation. Doctor of Philosophy, Central China Normal University, Wuhan (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Xun L, Bao Z (2007) Environmental policies based on government mobilization and their local implementation: a sociological analysis of ecological migration at s banner in Inner Mongolia. Soc Sci China 5:114–128 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Yep R (2004) Can “tax-for-fee” reform reduce rural tension in China? The process, progress and limitations. China Q 177:42–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu K (2015) Essays on the modernization of state governance. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Zhang H (2014) New trends in the production relation of the agriculture in China. Retrieved May 19, 2016 from Communist Party of China Website: http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/0114/c40531-24108732.html (in Chinese)
  25. Zhou F (2012) The problems of fiscal earmarked funds: On “governing the state through programs”. Chinese J Sociol 32(1):1–37 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Zuo M (2014) Rural funds fertile ground for graft. Retrieved October 25, 2014 from South China Morning Post website: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1624041/how-rural-spending-programmes-became-growth-area-graft

Copyright information

© Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and Urban PlanningNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations