Advertisement

An Analytical Study of Diametral Error in Simultaneous Turning Process

  • Sandeep Kumar
  • Kalidasan RathinamEmail author
  • Vivek Sharma
  • VaitlaSai Kumar
Conference paper
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 169)

Abstract

Diametral error plays a significant role in determining the quality of the machined component. It becomes more important for long-slendered workpiece with slenderness ratio greater than six. In the present work, an attempt is made to estimate the diametral error analytically during simultaneous turning process. The cutting tools are kept opposite to one another, so that the cutting forces act opposite to each of them. Euler–Bernoulli beam theory was applied to determine the cutting tool deflection. The workpiece was assumed as a propped cantilever beam. The diametral error was determined for various slenderness ratios of the workpiece. It was revealed that the diametral accuracy increased when the slenderness ratio decreased. This is due to the fact that lesser length-to-diameter ratio contributed to increased rigidity of the workpiece, resulting in the reduction of diametral error. The maximum and minimum diametral error occurred for the workpiece slenderness ratio of 8 and 4, respectively. Further, the results of the developed analytical model were compared with the published literature, and a good agreement was found.

Keywords

Simultaneous turning Diametral error Cutting forces Tool deflection 

References

  1. 1.
    McCullough, E.M.: ASME J. Eng. Ind. 402–404 (1963)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gouskov, A.M., Guskov, M.A., Tung, D.D., Panovko, G.Y.: J. Machin. Manuf. Reliab. 47(4), 317–323 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gouskov, A.M., Guskov, M.A., Tung, D.D., Panovko, G.Y.: Vibroeng. Procedia 17, 124–129 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalidasan, R., Sandeep, K.: Matec Web of Conferences, vol. 192, pp. 01001–01004 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reith, M.J., Bachrathy, D., Stepan, G.: J. Dyn. Syst. Measur. Control 139, 014503-1–014503-7(2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reith, Marta J., Bachrathy, Daniel, Stepan, Gabor: Mach. Sci. Technol. 20(3), 440–459 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadav, R.N.: Adv. Manuf. 5(2), 149–157 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yadav, R.N.: Measurement, 100, 131–138 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalidasan, R., Senthilvelan, S., Dixit, U.S., Vaibhav, J.: Int. J. Precis. Technol. 6(2), 142–158 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalidasan, R., Sandeep, K., Vivek, S.: Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Mechanical Design, Manufacture and Automation. Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, T., Tian, X.: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77(1–4), 281–288 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kops, L., Gould, M., Mizrach, M.: J. Eng. Ind. 115, 253–257 (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jianliang, G., Rongdi, H.: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 46, 1002–1012 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murthy: Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 10(2), 317–325 (1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandeep Kumar
    • 1
  • Kalidasan Rathinam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vivek Sharma
    • 1
  • VaitlaSai Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringLovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia

Personalised recommendations