Advertisement

Sustainable Management of Toxic Industrial Effluent of Coal-Based Power Plants

  • Ramesh Kumar
  • Alak Kumar Ghosh
  • Parimal Pal
Chapter
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the Microorganisms for Sustainability book series (MICRO, volume 18)

Abstract

Millions of tons of coke are produced to meet the demand of manufacturing of iron and steel industry and coal-based power plants with rapid urbanization. The conversion of coal to coke is one of the major sources of environmental pollution, because this process generates huge volume of coke-oven wastewater (COWW) during quenching of hot coke. The discharged wastewater contains cyanide, thiocyanide, ammonium-N, phenols with high biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total dissolved solids, total suspended solid, and polyaromatic compounds pose a threat to the existing flora and fauna of the ecosystem. In this chapter, detailed information is provided about the generation, characteristics, toxicity and harmful effect on environment of COWW. In addition, different sustainable technologies such as biological, physical, and integrated processes have been proposed for the sustainable treatment of COWW while comparing their merits and demerits with those of the existing technologies.

Keywords

Coke-oven wastewater Biological treatment Physical treatment Membrane separation Adsorption Struvite recovery 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Authors are highly acknowledged to the University Grant Commission, Government of India for financial support under Dr. D.S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship sanctioned No. F.4-2/2006 (BSR)/EN/16-17/0001, September 01, 2016 (65th List).

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee P, De S (2010) Coupled concentration polarization and pore flow modeling of nanofiltration of an industrial textile effluent. Sep Purif Technol 73(3):355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barakat MA, Chen YT, Huang CP (2004) Removal of toxic cyanide and Cu(II) ions from water by illuminated TiO2 catalyst. Appl Catal B 53:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barriga-Ordonez F, Nava-Alonso F, Uribe-Salas A (2006) Cyanide oxidation by ozone in a steady-state flow bubble column. Miner Eng 19:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997–2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharagava RN, Chandra R, Rai V (2008a) Phytoextraction of trace elements and physiological changes in Indian mustard plants (Brassica nigra L.) grow in post methanated distillery effluent (PMDE) irrigated soil. Bioresour Technol 99(17):8316–8324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bharagava RN, Chandra R, Singh SK (2008b) Characterization of phenolic metabolites from post methanated distillery effluent (PMDE) after degradation with bacterial consortium Ind. J Environ Prot 28(11):1019–1027Google Scholar
  8. Bharagava RN, Chandra R, Rai V (2009) Isolation and characterization of aerobic bacteria capable of the degradation of synthetic and natural melanoidins from distillery wastewater. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bharagava RN, Yadav S, Chandra R (2014) Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance properties of bacteria isolated from the aeration lagoons of common effluent treatment plant (CETP) of tannery industries (Unnao, India). Indian J Biotechnol 13:514–519Google Scholar
  10. Burmistrz P, Burmistrz M (2013) Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coke plant wastewater. Water Sci Technol 68(11):2414–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chakraborty S, Veeramani H (2006) Effect of HRT and recycle ratio on removal of cyanide, phenol, thiocyanate and ammonia in an anaerobic–anoxic– aerobic continuous system. Process Biochem 41:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandra R, Bharagava RN, Rai V (2008) Melanoidins as major colorant in sugarcane molasses based distillery effluent and its degradation. Bioresour Technol 99:4648–4660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandra R, Bharagava RN, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2011) Bacterial diversity, organic pollutants and their metabolites in two aeration lagoons of common effluent treatment plant during the degradation and detoxification of tannery wastewater. Bioresour Technol 102:2333–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang EE, Hsing HJ, Chiang CP et al (2008) The chemical and biological characteristics of coke-oven wastewater by ozonation. J Hazard Mater 156:560–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chu L, Wang J, Dong J et al (2012) Treatment of coking wastewater by an advanced Fenton oxidation process using iron powder and hydrogen peroxide. Chemosphere 86(4):409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dash RR, Balomajumder C, Kumar A (2008) Treatment of metal cyanide bearing wastewater by simultaneous adsorption and biodegradation (SAB). J Hazard Mater 152:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dong Y, Zhang J (2010) Testing the genotoxicity of coking wastewater using Vicia faba and Hordeum vulgare bioassays. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 73(5):944–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El Diwani G, El Rafie S, El Ibiari NN et al (2007) Recovery of ammonia nitrogen from industrial wastewater treatment as struvite slow releasing fertilizer. Desalination 214:200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Escher BI, Charlotte VD, Mriga D et al (2013) Most oxidative stress response in water samples comes from unknown chemicals: the need for effect-based water quality trigger values. Environ Sci Technol 47(13):7002–7011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC et al (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170(2–3):530–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghose MK, Kumar A (1993) Impact on surface water quality due to the discharge of coal washery effluents and dispersion profile of pollutant in Damodar river. Asian Environ 15(1):32–40Google Scholar
  22. Glen TD, Bruce ER, Samer A et al (2005) Are membrane bioreactors ready for widespread application? Environ Sci Technol 39:385–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hao XD, van Loosdrecht MCM (2006) Model-based evaluation of struvite recovery from P-released supernatant in a BNR process. Water Sci Technol 53(3):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiang W, Zhang W, Li B et al (2011) Combined Fenton oxidation and biological activated carbon process for recycling of coking plant effluent. J Hazard Mater 189:308–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jianlong W, Xiangchun Q, Libo W et al (2002) Bioaugmentation as a tool to enhance the removal of refractory compound in coke plant wastewater. Process Biochem 38:777–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim Y, Lee JH, Kim YC et al (2015) Operation and simulation of pilot-scale forward osmosis desalination with ammonium bicarbonate. Chem Eng Res Des 94:390–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kishor R, Bharagava RN, Saxena G (2019) Industrial wastewaters: the major sources of dye contamination in the environment, ecotoxicological effects, and bioremediation approaches. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Recent advances in environmental management. CRC Press Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, p 13. ISBN: 978-0-8153-8314-7Google Scholar
  28. Kumar R, Pal P (2012) Response surface-optimized Fenton’s pre-treatment for chemical precipitation of struvite and recycling of water through downstream nanofiltration. Chem Eng J 210:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar R, Pal P (2013) Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes. Water Environ Res 85(5):447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar R, Pal P (2013a) Turning hazardous waste into value-added products: production and characterization of struvite from ammoniacal waste with new approaches. J Clean Prod 43:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar R, Pal P (2013b) A membrane-integrated advanced scheme for treatment of industrial wastewater: dynamic modeling towards scale up. Chemosphere 92:1375–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar R, Pal P (2013c) Membrane-integrated hybrid bioremediation of industrial wastewater: a continuous treatment and recycling approach. J Water Reuse Desal 3:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar R, Pal P (2014) Membrane-integrated hybrid system for the effective treatment of ammoniacal wastewater of coke-making plant: a volume reduction approach. Environ Technol 35(16):2018–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar R, Pal P (2015a) A novel forward osmosis-nano filtration integrated system for coke-oven wastewater reclamation. Chem Eng Res Des 100:542–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar R, Pal P (2015b) Assessing the feasibility of N and P recovery by struvite precipitation from nutrient-rich wastewater: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:17453–17464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar R, Bhakta P, Chakraborty S et al (2011) Separating cyanide from coke wastewater by cross flow nanofiltration. Sep Sci Technol 46:2119–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumar R, Chakrabortty S, Pal P (2015) Membrane-integrated physico-chemical treatment of coke-oven wastewater: transport modelling and economic evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:6010–6023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lai P, Zhao HZ, al WC (2007) Advanced treatment of coking wastewater by coagulation and zero-valent iron processes. J Hazard Mater 147(1–2):232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li H, Han H, Du M et al (2011) Removal of phenols, thiocyanate and ammonium from coal gasification wastewater using moving bed biofilm reactor. Bioresour Technol 102:4667–4673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu R, Huang X, Xi JY et al (2005) Microbial behaviour in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention. Process Biochem 40:3165–3170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang A et al (2017) Treatment effects and genotoxicity relevance of the toxic organic pollutants in semi-coking wastewater by combined treatment process. Environ Pollut 220:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lu XY, Li B, Zhang T et al (2012) Enhanced anoxic bioremediation of PAHs contaminated sediment. Bioresour Technol 104:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lubello C, Caffaz S, Mangini L et al (2007) MBR pilot plant for textile wastewater treatment and reuse. Water Sci Technol 55:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma D, Liu C, Zhu X et al (2016) Acute toxicity and chemical evaluation of coking wastewater under biological and advanced physicochemical treatment processes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18343–18352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ma X, Wang X, Liu Y et al (2017) Variations in toxicity of semi-coking wastewater treatment processes and their toxicity prediction. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 138:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maranon E, Vazquez I, Rodriguez J et al (2008a) Treatment of coke wastewater in a sequential batch reactor (SBR) at pilot plant scale. Bioresour Technol 99:4192–4198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maranon E, Vazquez I, Rodriguez J et al (2008b) Coke wastewater treatment by a three-step activated sludge system. Water Air Soil Pollut 192:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marr R, Koucar M (1993) Recovery of ammonium-N from industrial wastewater. Int Chem Eng 33(3):416Google Scholar
  49. Marrone PA, Hodes M, Smith KA et al (2004) Salt precipitation and scale control in supercritical water oxidation-part B: commercial/full-scale applications. J Supercrit Fluids 29:289–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marrot B, Barrios-Martinez A, Moulin P et al (2004) Industrial wastewater treatment in a membrane bioreactor: a review. Environ Prog 23:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marvan IJ, Craig F, Sutton PM (1992) Treatability evaluation of coking plant effluent. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 30:313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mason TJ (1990) Chemistry with ultrasound, published for the Society of Chemical Industry. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  53. Moussavi G, Khosravi R (2010) Removal of cyanide from wastewater by adsorption onto pistachio hull wastes: parametric experiments, kinetics and equilibrium analysis. J Hazard Mater 183:724–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ning N, Bart HJ, Jiang Y et al (2005) Treatment of organic pollutants in coke plant wastewater by the method of ultrasonic irradiation, catalytic oxidation and activated sludge. Sep Purif Technol 41:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Okouchi S, Nojima O, Arai T (1992) Cavitation induced degradation of phenol by ultrasound. Water Sci Technol 26(9–11):2053–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pal P, Kumar R (2014) Treatment of coke-wastewater: a critical review for developing sustainable management strategies. Sep Purif Rev 43(2):89–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pal P, Bhakta P, Kumar R (2014a) Cyanide removal from industrial wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration: transport modeling and economic evaluation. Water Environ Res 86(8):698–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pal P, Kumar R, Srivastava N et al (2014b) A visual basic simulation software tool for performance analysis of a membrane-based advanced water treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:1833–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pal P, Abrar I, Kumar R (2015) Managing hazardous municipal wastewater: a membrane-integrated hybrid approach for fast and effective treatment in low temperature environment. J Membr Sci Technol 4(2):53–65Google Scholar
  60. Parga JR, Shukla SS, Carrillo-Pedroza FR (2003) Destruction of cyanide waste solutions using chlorine dioxide, ozone and Titania sol. Waste Manag 23:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park D, Kim YM, Lee DS et al (2008a) Chemical treatment for treating cyanides-containing effluent from biological cokes wastewater treatment process. Chem Eng J 143:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Park D, Lee DS, Kim YM et al (2008b) Bioaugmentation of cyanide-degrading microorganisms in a full-scale cokes wastewater treatment facility. Bioresour Technol 99:2092–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perez M, Torrades F, Domenech X et al (2002) Removal of organic contaminants in pulp effluents by AOPs: an economic study. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Phuntsho S, Hong S, Elimelech M et al (2013) Forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater: meeting water quality requirements for fertigation by integrating nanofiltration. J Membr Sci 436:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pollice A, Laera G, Saturno D et al (2008) Effects of sludge retention time on the performance of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal sewage. J Membr Sci 317:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Qin JJ, Wai MN, Tao GH et al (2007) Membrane bioreactor study for reclamation of mixed sewage mostly from industrial sources. Sep Purif Technol 53:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rahman MM, Al-Malack MH (2006) Performance of a cross flow membrane bioreactor (CF-MBR) when treating refinery wastewater. Desalination 191:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reemtsma T, Zywicki B, Stueber M et al (2002) Removal of sulfur organic polar micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor treating industrial wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 36:1102–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ren L, Schuchardt F, Shen Y et al (2010) Impact of struvite crystallization on nitrogen losses during composting of pig manure and cornstalk. Waste Manag 30:885–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Richards DJ, Shieh WK (1989) Anoxic oxic activated sludge treatment of cyanides and phenols. Biotechnol Bioeng 33:32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ronteltap M, Maurer M, Gujer W (2007) Struvite precipitation thermodynamics in source-separated urine. Water Res 41:977–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shen J, Zhao H, Cao H et al (2014) Chen, removal of total cyanide in coking wastewater during a coagulation process: significance of organic polymers. J Environ Sci 26:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Staib C, Lant P (2007) Thiocyanate degradation during activated sludge treatment of coke-ovens wastewater. Biochem Eng J 34:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strathmann H, Ho WS, Sirkar KK (eds) (1992) Membrane handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Tian DY, Lin ZF, Yu JQ et al (2012) Influence factors of multicomponent mixtures containing reactive chemicals and their joint effects. Chemosphere 88(8):994–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ueno Y, Fujii M (2001) Three years’ experience of operating and selling recovered struvite from full-scale plant. Environ Technol 22:1373–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Uysal A, Demir S, Sayilgan E et al (2014) Optimization of struvite fertilizer formation from baker’s yeast wastewater: growth and nutrition of maize and tomato plants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:3264–3274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vázquez I, Rodríguez J, Marañón E et al (2006a) Study of aerobic biodegradation of coke wastewater in a two and three-step activated sludge process. J Hazard Mater 137:1681–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vázquez I, Rodríguez J, Marañón E et al (2006b) Simultaneous removal of phenol, ammonium and thiocyanate from coke wastewater by aerobic biodegradation. J Hazard Mater 137:1773–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang WB, Cicek N, Ilg J (2006) State of the art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J Membr Sci 270:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yuan X, Sun H, Guo D (2012) The removal of COD from coking wastewater using extraction replacement–biodegradation coupling. Desalination 289:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zainith S, Purchase D, Saratale GD, Ferreira LFR, Bilal M, Bharagava RN (2019) Isolation and characterization of lignin-degrading bacterium Bacillus aryabhattai from pulp and paper mill wastewater and evaluation of its lignin-degrading potential. 3 Biotech 9(3):92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang M, Tay JH, Qian Y et al (1998) Coke plant wastewater treatment by fixed biofilm system for COD and NH3-N removal. Water Res 32:591–527Google Scholar
  84. Zhang W, Wei CH, Peng PG (2010a) Components and degradation characteristics analysis of phenols in coking wastewater in biological fluidized bed A/A/O process. Chin J Environ Eng 4:253–258Google Scholar
  85. Zhang MH, Zhao QL, Bai X et al (2010b) Adsorption of organic pollutants from coking wastewater by activated coke. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 362:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhao WT, Huang X, Lee D et al (2009a) Use of submerged anaerobic–anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor to treat highly toxic coke wastewater with complete sludge retention. J Membr Sci 330:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhao WT, Huang X, Lee D (2009b) Enhanced treatment of coke plant wastewater using an anaerobic–anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor system. Sep Purif Technol 66:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhao WT, Shen YX, Xiao K et al (2010) Fouling characteristics in a membrane bioreactor coupled with anaerobic–anoxic–oxic process for coke wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 101:3876–3883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhao S, Zou L, Mulcahy D (2012) Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis—nano filtration system using divalent draw solute. Desalination 284:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhu X, Ni J, Lai P (2009) Advanced treatment of biologically retreated coking wastewater by electrochemical oxidation using boron-doped diamond electrodes. Water Res 43:4347–4355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramesh Kumar
    • 1
  • Alak Kumar Ghosh
    • 1
  • Parimal Pal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryThe University of BurdwanBurdwan (E)India
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering DepartmentNational Institute of Technology DurgapurBurdwan (W)India

Personalised recommendations