Band Segmentation and Detection of DNA by Using Fast Fuzzy C-mean and Neuro Adaptive Fuzzy Inference System

  • Muhammad Arif
  • Guojun WangEmail author
  • Valentina Emilia Balas
  • Shuhong Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1122)


Currently, band segmentation is used in medical science, because it helps the scientist to detect and calculate the band and line respectively. Segmentation is very important in medical images, because it provides the clinical assistance to physician. Such as, the DNA images are used to detect and segment the bands and line and calculate the local minima and maxima. For segmentation, we use Fast Fuzzy C-Mean Clustering (FFCM). FFCM is a clustering method that allows a piece of data to be in two or more clusters. Clustering involves the task of dividing the data points into homogeneous classes or the clusters, so that items in the same class are as equitable as possible and the items in the different classes are different. Our results indicate that our proposed method effectively detects the band and counts the lines.


DNA Band Segmentation Clustering ANFIS Detection 



This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61632009, in part by the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation under Grant 2017A030308006, and in part by the High-Level Talents Program of Higher Education in Guangdong Province under Grant 2016ZJ01.


  1. 1.
    Arif, M., Abdullah, N.A., Phalianakote, S.K., Ramli, N., Elahi, M.: Maximizing information of multimodality brain image fusion using curvelet transform with genetic algorithm. In: 2014 International Conference on Computer Assisted System in Health, pp. 45–51. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arif, M., Alam, K.A., Hussain, M.: Application of data mining using artificial neural network: survey. Int. J. Database Theory Appl. 8(1), 245–270 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arif, M., Mahmood, T.: Cloud computing and its environmental effects. Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput. 8(1), 279–286 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arif, M., Shakeel, H.: Virtualization security: analysis and open challenges. Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol. 8(2), 237–246 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arif, M., Wang, G.: Fast curvelet transform through genetic algorithm for multimodal medical image fusion. Soft Comput. 1–22 (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arif, M., Wang, G., Balas, V.E.: Secure VANETs: trusted communication scheme between vehicles and infrastructure based on fog computing. Stud. Inform. Control 27(2), 235–246 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arif, M., Wang, G., Chen, S.: Deep learning with non-parametric regression model for traffic flow prediction. In: 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 16th International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 4th International Conference on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech), pp. 681–688. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arif, M., Wang, G., Peng, T.: Track me if you can? Query based dual location privacy in VANETs for V2V and V2I. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), pp. 1091–1096. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arif, M., Wang, G., Wang, T., Peng, T.: SDN-based secure VANETs communication with fog computing. In: Wang, G., Chen, J., Yang, L.T. (eds.) SpaCCS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11342, pp. 46–59. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bajcsy, P.: An overview of DNA microarray grid alignment and foreground separation approaches. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2006(1), 080163 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belaout, A., Krim, F., Mellit, A., Talbi, B., Arabi, A.: Multiclass adaptive neuro-fuzzy classifier and feature selection techniques for photovoltaic array fault detection and classification. Renew. Energy 127, 548–558 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Binesh, N., Rezghi, M.: Fuzzy clustering in community detection based on nonnegative matrix factorization with two novel evaluation criteria. Appl. Soft Comput. 69, 689–703 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Couso, I., Borgelt, C., Hullermeier, E., Kruse, R.: Fuzzy sets in data analysis: from statistical foundations to machine learning. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 14(1), 31–44 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geman, O., Chiuchisan, I., Ungurean, I., Hagan, M., Arif, M.: Ubiquitous healthcare system based on the sensors network and android internet of things gateway. In: 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), pp. 1390–1395. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Javaid, Q., Arif, M., Awan, D., Shah, M.: Efficient facial expression detection by using the adaptive-neuro-fuzzy-inference-system and the bezier curve. Sindh Univ. Res. J.-SURJ (Sci. Ser.) 48(3) (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Javaid, Q., Arif, M., Talpur, S.: Segmentation and classification of calcification and hemorrhage in the brain using fuzzy c-mean and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Quaid-e-Awam Univ. Res. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 15(1), 50–63 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Javaid, Q., Arif, M., Shah, M.A., Nadeem, M., et al.: A hybrid technique for de-noising multi-modality medical images by employing cuckoo’s search with curvelet transform. Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 37(1), 29 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mikaeil, R., Haghshenas, S.S., Haghshenas, S.S., Ataei, M.: Performance prediction of circular saw machine using imperialist competitive algorithm and fuzzy clustering technique. Neural Comput. Appl. 29(6), 283–292 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muhammad, A., Guojun, W.: Segmentation of calcification and brain hemorrhage with midline detection. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications and 2017 IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications (ISPA/IUCC), pp. 1082–1090. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oktay, O., et al.: Anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNNS): application to cardiac image enhancement and segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(2), 384–395 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Petković, D., Arif, M., Shamshirband, S., Bani-Hani, E.H., Kiakojoori, D.: Sensorless estimation of wind speed by soft computing methodologies: a comparative study. Informatica 26(3), 493–508 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ur Rahman, H., Azzedin, F., Shawahna, A., Sajjad, F., Abdulrahman, A.S.: Performance evaluation of VDI environment. In: 2016 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH), pp. 104–109. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ur Rahman, H., Wang, G., Chen, J., Jiang, H.: Performance evaluation of hypervisors and the effect of virtual CPU on performance. In: 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), pp. 772–779. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rizvi, S.Q.A., Wang, G., Chen, J.: A service oriented healthcare architecture (SOHA-CC) based on cloud computing. In: Wang, G., Chen, J., Yang, L.T. (eds.) SpaCCS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11342, pp. 84–97. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharif, M., Khan, M.A., Iqbal, Z., Azam, M.F., Lali, M.I.U., Javed, M.Y.: Detection and classification of citrus diseases in agriculture based on optimized weighted segmentation and feature selection. Comput. Electron. Agric. 150, 220–234 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tripathi, S., Anand, R., Fernandez, E.: A review of brain MR image segmentation techniques. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Innovations in Applied Science, Engineering & Technology, pp. 16–17 (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang, M.S., Nataliani, Y.: A feature-reduction fuzzy clustering algorithm based on feature-weighted entropy. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(2), 817–835 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang, Y.H., Buckley, M.J., Dudoit, S., Speed, T.P.: Comparison of methods for image analysis on cDNA microarray data. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 11(1), 108–136 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yazdi, M., Bouwmans, T.: New trends on moving object detection in video images captured by a moving camera: a survey. Comput. Sci. Rev. 28, 157–177 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, H., Bruzzone, L., Shi, W., Hao, M., Wang, Y.: Enhanced spatially constrained remotely sensed imagery classification using a fuzzy local double neighborhood information c-means clustering algorithm. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 11(8), 2896–2910 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang, Y., Bai, X., Fan, R., Wang, Z.: Deviation-sparse fuzzy c-means with neighbor information constraint. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 27(1), 185–199 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhu, Y.P., Li, P.: Survey on the image segmentation algorithms. In: Qu, Z., Lin, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2017. SSGG, pp. 475–488. Springer, Singapore (2019). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Aurel Vlaicu University of AradAradRomania

Personalised recommendations