Advertisement

Garfinkel: Members’ Methods of Producing Order

  • Feifei Zhou
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Ethnomethodology, on the one hand, acknowledges the ambiguous, indeterminate, highly dynamic nature of social reality in which all of us live, on the other hand, it believes in the organized nature of social situations and the patternedness of social members’ methods. In a word, as is summarized by Atkinson and Drew (1979, p. 20), in order to provide an adequate theory of social order, ethnomethodology aims to be ‘neither so inflexible or rigid that it lacks any sensitivity to the potentially infinite range of contextual variation in the world, nor so inflexible or loose that nothing at all is held to be general across different contexts.’ In this chapter, I will first introduce some important conceptualizations in ethnomethodology such as the role of social members, intelligible meaning-making, indexicality and reflexivity, which are central to Garfinkel’s solution of the problem of social order. In particular, we will see how his linguistically charged accounts provide fruitful possibilities to conceptualize the languaging social actor beyond the system view as outlined in Part I. Following that, I will analyze the methodological difficulties inherent in Garfinkel’s project.

References

  1. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garfinkel, H. (1952). The perception of the other: A study in social order. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  3. Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction. Cognitive determinants (pp. 187–238). New York: The Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  4. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garfinkel, H. (2002). In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkeim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Garfinkel, H. (2006). In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Boulder and London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  8. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 160–193). New York: Appleton-Century-Croffs.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. English version: Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. A. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Hilbert, R. A. (1992). The classical roots of ethnomethodology: Durkheim, Weber, and Garfinkel. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lynch, M. (2012). Revisiting the cultural dope. Human Studies, 35(2), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D. C., & Blum, A. F. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Rawls, A. W. (2006). Introduction. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action (pp. 1–99). Boulder and London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  17. Schütz, A. (1962). In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. Zimmerman, D. H. (1974). Preface. In D. L. Wieder (Ed.), Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code (pp. iii–xxii). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feifei Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishLingnan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations