National Human Rights Institutions in Southeast Asian States: The Necessary Foundation for an Efficient ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights

  • Céline MartinEmail author


Twenty years ago, the Tehran Framework, adopted during the yearly Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) regional workshop for Asia-Pacific laid out four pillars, of which one suggested the idea that National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) are the most solid foundation at the national level to build an efficient regional human rights mechanism (Baik, Tae-Ung. 2012. Emerging Regional Human Rights Systems in Asia. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 194).

In the absence of a strong regional mechanism, the NHRIs have an important role to play for the promotion and the protection of human rights in the Southeast Asian (SEA) states, in the event where those NHRIs are in conformity with the 1993 Paris Principles. Those principles include independence both in their funding and in their operations, with the possibility of conducting enquiries based on individual communications. According to the Global Alliance on NHRIs (GANHRI), which is mandated by the UN to grade and give accreditation to NHRIs, most of the SEA NHRIs do not enforce those principles at an efficient level, or not at all.

Given the lack of independence of the SEA NHRIs and the inefficiency of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR), there has been little literature on the complementarity of the NHRIs and the AICHR in their roles, both at the national and at the regional level. Indeed, we strongly believe that such complementary is a luckily possibility if the NHRIs and the AICHR take their cooperation to the next level.

Our chapter will explore (1) how, within their own mandates, the existing SEA NHRIs and the AICHR can work together to advance the promotion and protection of Human Rights in the region; (2) how laws that would establish NHRIs in the remaining countries could be adopted in order to respect the Paris Principles while being strong foundations to the AICHR; and (3) how best practices from NHRIs evolving in a different regional environment (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), African Commission on Human Rights (AfHRC)) can influence the AICHR to strengthen the relationships between SEA NHRIs.


  1. ADHOC. 2015. Cambodia: Symbolic Institutions Are No Substitute.
  2. ———. 2017a. News Archive.
  3. ———. 2017b. AICHR Judicial Colloquium on the Sharing of Good Practices Regarding International Human Rights Law. March 13.
  4. Asia Pacific Forum. 2017. Supporting the Establishment of National Human Rights Institutions.
  5. Baik, Tae-Ung. 2012. Emerging Regional Human Rights Systems in Asia. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. de Beco, Gauthier. 2010. Role of National Human Rights Institutions in the Implementation of the Judgements of the European Court of Human Rights.
  7. Dam, Shubhankar. 2007. Lessons from National Human Rights Institutions Around the World for State and Local Human Rights Commissions in the United States, Human Rights Commissions and Criminal Justice, 5 (August).
  8. Dinokopila, Bonolo R. 2010. Beyond Paper Based Affiliate Status: National Human Rights Institutions and the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights. African Human Rights Law Journal.
  9. ENNHRI. 2011. Amicus Curae in Gauer and Others v. France.
  10. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2012. Handbook on the Establishment and Accreditation of National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  11. FIDH. 2015. Laos: Government Mocks UN Human Rights Review. Worldwide Movement for Human Rights. June 30.
  12. ———. 2017a. Directory of Institutions – Asia Pacific.
  13. ———. 2017b. Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA).
  14. Global Alliance of the National Human Rights Institutions. 2017. Accessed March 17.
  15. High Level Conference on the Future of the, and European Court of Human Rights. 2012. Brighton Declaration.
  16. ICJ. 2016. ICJ Urges AICHR to Adopt Transparent Accreditation Procedure, June 6.
  17. IHRDA. 2015. FactSheet: NANHRI and the African Court & African Commission.
  18. Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1994. Strengthening National Structures, Institutions and Organisations of Society Which Play a Role in Promoting and Safeguarding Human Rights.
  19. Khine Khine Win. 2016. Southeast Asia National Human Rights Institution Forum (SEANF). Global New Light Of Myanmar, June 9.
  20. Kuah, A. 2016. Singapore Needs Independent Human Rights Commission. Text. The Straits Times. February 3.
  21. NANHRI. 2016a. Guidelines on the Role of NHRIs in Monitoring Implementation of Recommendations of the African Commission on Human and Peoples´ Rights and Judgments of the African Court on Human and Peoples. Published by The Network of African National Human Rights Institutions. Available at
  22. ———. 2016b. A Mapping Survey of the Complaint Handling Systems of African National Human Rights Institutions. Published by The Network of African National Human Rights Institutions. Available at
  23. NHRI Torture prevention & response. 2012. Latin America – NHRI.
  24. OHCHR-Cambodia. 2006. Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions. Vol. Preface.Google Scholar
  25. Phan, Hao Duy. 2012. A Selective Approach to Establishing a Human Rights Mechanism in Southeast Asia: The Case for a Southeast Asian Court of Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Rajska, Dagmara, and Zuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszcz. 2016. Ombudsperson Institutions in Europe: Their Role as Third Party Interveners before the Echr and Their Initiatives before the Council of Europe. Key.Google Scholar
  27. Reif, Linda C. 2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.Google Scholar
  28. SAPA Task Force on ASEAN and Human Rights. 2014. Submission to the AICHR Regional Consultation with Civil Society on the Review of the AICHR TOR « FORUM-ASIA.
  29. SEANF. 2007. Declarations: ASEAN NHRIs Forged Cooperation Agreement.
  30. ———. 2017. South East Asia NHRI Forum.
  31. The Brunei Project. 2016. The Important Role Played by National Human Rights Institutions. June 10.
  32. Ulrik Spliid. 2013. NHRIs and Public Participation. Issue Paper. The Danish Institute for Human Rights.
  33. UNDP. 2016. National Human Rights Bodies Playing Key Role in Advancing Africa’s Rights Agenda, Says Study. December 16.
  34. UNDP, and NANHRI. 2016. Study on the State of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in Africa.
  35. United Nations. 1993. Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions. Vol. 48/134.
  36. Vu, Giao Cong, and Kien Tran. 2016. Constitutional Debate and Development on Human Rights in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 11, No. 2: 235–62. Scholar
  37. Wahyuningrum, Yuyun. 2014. AICHR After Five Years: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities. Focus 76 (June).

Copyright information

© Asia Centre 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aix-Marseille UniversityMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations