Advertisement

Value-Based Enterprise Risk Management: Ergonomics, Ethics, and Organizational Structure Considered Approach

  • Ayse Kucuk YilmazEmail author
  • Triant G. Flouris
Chapter

Abstract

In terms of system approach, enterprises are open systems. Open systems have the potential to be affected and influenced by both internal and external factors. Businesses, such as individuals, have to keep up with the external and internal environments in which they are maintained.

References

  1. AIRMIC, ALARM, IRM. 2010. A structured approach to enterprise risk management (ERM) and the requirements of ISO 31000. [Online] Available at: https://www.theirm.org/media/886062/ISO3100_doc.pdf. Accessed 24 Ekim 2016.
  2. Aven, T. 2008. Risk analysis—Assessing uncertainties beyond expected values and probabilities. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Babalık, F. 2016. Mühendislik İçin Ergonomi (İşbilim), 5th ed. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.Google Scholar
  4. Baes, K., et al. 2016a. Embracing complexity with value-based risk management. PRISM (1): 28 (Arthur DLittle Global).Google Scholar
  5. Baes, K., et al. 2016b. Embracing complexity with value-based risk management. PRISM 1(1): 27–41, 32.Google Scholar
  6. Bagis, A. 2013. Ergonomi Ders Notları, 11. [Online] Available at http://www.abdullahdemir.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Ergonomi-Ders-Notlari_Dr.-A.-Bagis.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2019.
  7. Bailey, R. 1982. Human performance engineering: A guide for system designers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Bilegt, E. 2012. ÖRGÜT KÜLTÜRÜ İLE ÇALIŞAN MOTİVASYONU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ VE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi/ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü/ İşletme Anabilim Dalı/ İşletme Yönetimi ve Organizasyon Bilim Dal.Google Scholar
  9. Bozoglan. 2010. The effect of organizational culture on performance criteria and TESCO KIPA Aplication. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12397/10707
  10. Bridger, R. 1995. Introduction to ergonomics. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BSI. 2016. ISO 31000 Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi. [Online] Available at: http://www.bsigroup.com/tr-TR/ISO-31000-Kurumsal-Risk-Yonetimi/. Accessed 25 Ekim 2016.
  12. Bukvič, V. 2014. Value based management with a practical example, 195–205. Portoroz, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  13. CAA. 2002a. CAP 715: An introduction to aircraft maintenance engineering human factors for JAR 66. [Online] Available at: https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP715.PDF. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.
  14. CAA. 2002b. CAP 718: Human factors in aircraft maintenance and inspection. [Online] Available at: https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP718.PDF. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.
  15. CAA, Civil Aviation Authority. 2002c. CAP 720: Flight crew training: Cockpit resource management (CRM) and line-oriented flight training (LOFT). [Online] Available at: https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/890.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.
  16. COSO. 2004. COSO enterprise risk management—Integrated framework (executive summary). [Online] Available at: http://www.coso.org/documents/coso_erm_executivesummary.pdf. Accessed 20 Ekim 2016.
  17. Curran, K.M. 2006. Value-based risk management. Cost Engineering 48(2), 15–22.Google Scholar
  18. Deloach, J. 2015. A value-based approach to risk management. [Online] Available at: https://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/a-value-based-approach-to-risk-management/. Accessed 17 Aug 2019.
  19. Demir, T. 2013. A research on the effect of personnel empowerment on internal entrepreneurship and the role of organizational culture in this relation, Istanbul, 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Derici, O., Z. Tüysüz, and A. Sarı. 2007. Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi ve Sayıştay Uygulaması. [Online] Available at: http://dergi.sayistay.gov.tr/Default.asp?sayfa=3&id=521. Accessed 25 Ekim 2016.
  21. Dul, J., and B. Weerdmeester. 2007. Ergonomi: Ne, Neden, Nasıl? Ankara: Seçkin.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, E. 1995. Aviation ergonomics: Whence and whither? Ergonomics 38 (3): 565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emhan, A. 2009. Risk management process and techniques used in risk management. Retrieved October 22, 2016, from Atatürk University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences: http://e-dergi.atauni.edu.tr/atauniiibd/article/viewFile/1025002889/1025002785. Accessed 22 Ekim 2016.
  24. Erdem, E. 2014. Employee risk perception in enterprise risk management: A case study of a development agency. Retrieved November 01, 2016.Google Scholar
  25. Erkan, N. 2003. Ergonomi, no. 373. Ankara: MPM Yayınları, Yayın.Google Scholar
  26. FERMA. 2011. Risk management standards. Retrieved at October 22, 2016, from http://www.ferma.eu/app/uploads/2011/11/a-risk-management-standard-turkish-version.pdf.
  27. Fernandez, J.E., M. Goodman, E.H. Group, and V.A. Alexandria. 2018. SOFOS Database on sustainable waste management. [Online] Available at: http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert/sofos/nawtec/nawtec08/nawtec08-0019.pdf.
  28. Flouris, T.G., and A.K. Yilmaz. 2010. Managing corporate sustainability: Risk management process based perspective. African Journal of Business Management.Google Scholar
  29. Flouris, T.G., and A.K. Yilmaz. 2011. Risk Management and Corporate Sustainability in Aviation. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. GleiBner, W. 2005. Value based corporate risk management. In: Risk management: Challenge and opportunity, 479–494, 480. Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26993-2_24.
  31. Guastello, S. 2006. Human factors engineering and ergonomics: A system approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Güneş, Ş. 2009. A Study on Enterprise Risk Management and Awareness in Turkey. Retrieved October 22, 2016, from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/NationalTezCenter/. Accessed 22 Ekim 2016.
  33. IEA. 2018. What is ergonomics? [Online] Available at: https://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html.
  34. Improved from BOZOĞLAN, İ.T. 2010. ÖRGÜT KÜLTÜRÜNÜN PERFORMANS KRİTERLERİNE ETKİSİ VE TESCO KİPA UYGULAMASI.Google Scholar
  35. ISO. 2016. ISO 31000—Risk management. [Online] Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso31000.htm. Accessed 24 Ekim 2016.
  36. JAA. 2012. Human factors/CRM in aviation training course book. Hoofddorp: Joint Aviation Authority.Google Scholar
  37. Jacobsen, A.R., B.D. Kelly, D.L. Hilby, and R.J. Mumaw. 2002. Human factors testing and evaluation in commercial airplane flight deck development. In Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation, 2nd ed., ed. Samuel G. Charlton and Thomas G. O’Brien. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Kalim, M. 2018. Human factors and ergonomics in aviation. [Online] Available at: https://sites.tufts.edu/maureenenp61/2018/02/13/human-factors-and-ergonomics-in-aviation/.
  39. KIWA. 2016. KIWA. [Online] Available at: http://hizmetler.kiwa.com.tr/sistem-belgelendirme/risk-yonetimi. Accessed 25 Ekim 2016.
  40. Kızılboğa, R. 2012a. Transition from traditional risk management to enterprise risk management system. Retrieved October 12, 2016, from http://e-dergi.atauni.edu.tr/ataunisosbil/article/view/1020009163.
  41. Kızılboğa, R. 2012b. Risk Yönetimi ve Ülke Uygulamalarında Risk Yönetim Modelleri. [Online] Available at: http://www.academia.edu/7589977/R%C4%B0SK_Y%C3%96NET%C4%B0M%C4%B0_VE_%C3%9CLKE_UYGULAMALARINDA_R%C4%B0SK_Y%C3%96NET%C4%B0M_MODELLER%C4%B0. Accessed 23 Ekim 2016.
  42. Kızılboğa, R. 2012c. Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi Odaklı İç Denetim veİstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi İçin Bir Model Önerisi. [Online].Google Scholar
  43. Kizilboga, R. 2012. KURUMSAL RİSK YÖNETİMİ ODAKLI İÇ DENETĠM VE İSTANBUL BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYESİ İÇİN BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ. İSTANBUL.Google Scholar
  44. Kızılboğa, R. 2014. Risk Yönetimi ve Ülke Uygulamalarında Risk Yönetim Modelleri. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi. (7): 83.Google Scholar
  45. Kroemer, K.K., and K. Kroemer-Elbert. 1994. Ergonomics: How to design for ease and efficiency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  46. Kucuk Yilmaz, A., and E. Yazgan. 2018. Corporate performance management: Process of organizational-tailored flow chart. AEAT 90 (9): 23.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-09-2017-0201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kucuk Yilmaz, A., E. Yazgan, K. Malagas, and N. Nikitakos. 2018. Risk Matrix Approach to Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance Organization, ATINER’s Conference Paper Series MGT2018-2560, 16th Annual International Conference on Management & Marketing, 2–5 July 2018, Athens, Greece (Organized by the Management Unit and Marketing Unit of ATINER; Sponsored by the Athens Journal of Business & Economics).Google Scholar
  48. Kucuk Yılmaz, A., and E. Yazgan. In press process. Corporate performance management: Process of organizational—Tailored flow chart. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology.Google Scholar
  49. Leveson, N. 2015. A systems approach to RISK Management through leading safety indicators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 136: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maurino, D.E. 2000. Human factors and aviation safety: What the industry has, what the industry needs. Ergonomics 43 (7): 952–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moody, M.J. 2009. ERM: The big picture. Rough Notes [Online] 152 (1): 74. Rough Notes Magazine.Google Scholar
  52. Moray, N. 2005a. Ergonomics: The history and scope of human factors, 1. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  53. Moray, N. 2005b. Ergonomics: Major writings, vols. 1–4. London: Taylor & Francis, Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Müller, R., A. Wittmer, and C. Drax. 2014. Aviation risk and safety management methods and Applications in aviation organizations. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oge, H. 2015. Örgütsel Etkinlik için Ergonomi, 189. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.Google Scholar
  56. Ozturk, Z., and Ü. Arslan. 2016. HASTANE PERSONELİNİN DURUMSALLIK YAKLAŞIMINA GÖRE ORGANİZASYONEL KONUMLANDIRMA ALGISI. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 18 (1): 128–152.Google Scholar
  57. Pehlivanlı, D. 2008. Enterprise risk management applications based internal audit and turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/NationalTezCenter/.
  58. Sabancı, A., and S. Sumer. 2015. Ergonomi, 3rd ed., 472. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.Google Scholar
  59. Sabancı, A., S.K. Sümer, and S.M. Say. 2012. Endüstriyel Ergonomi, 3rd ed. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.Google Scholar
  60. Şahin, A. 2010, p. 22. Örgüt Kültürü-Yönetim İlişkisi ve Yönetsel Etkinlik. [Online] Available at: http://dergiler.sgb.gov.tr/calismalar/maliye_dergisi/yayinlar/md/159/Ali, http://dergiler.sgb.gov.tr/calismalar/maliye_dergisi/yayinlar/md/159/AliŞAHİN.pdf. Accessed 01 Kasım 2016.
  61. Saka, T., and A. Uğural. 2015. Enterprise risk management. Retrieved October 25, 2016, from TÜSİAD: http://tusiad.org/tr/faaliyet-raporlari/item/download/7447_ee46d69c7085eaf0f975bcad252b9afd.
  62. Segal, S. 2005. Value–based enterprise risk management. [Online] Available at: https://www.soa.org/Library/Newsletters/The-Actuary-Magazine/2005/June/val2005june.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2018.
  63. Segal, S., 2011. Corporate value of enterprise RISK management. [Online] Available at: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470882549.html. Accessed 15 Ekim 2016.
  64. Shanmugam, A., and T. P. Robert. 2015. Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: A review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 21 (4): 478–505, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. SkyBrary. 2018. Human factor. [Online] Available at: https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Human_Factors. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.
  66. Sogg, S. 2002. An integrated systems approach to human factors in commercial aviation maintenance system. [Online] Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/efa3/95eb6f0f1d4c881c482170ec4d040dfb9718.pdf.
  67. Stanton, N.A., W.-C. Li, and D. Harri. 2019. Human factors in aviation. Ergonomics 62: 2, 131–137, 131.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1564589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. TAV Airports Holding. 2018. Management philosophy. [Online] Available at: http://www.tavhavalimanlari.com.tr/en-EN/Pages/ManagementPhilosophy.aspx.
  69. Terzioğlu, M. 2010. Ekip Kaynak Yönetimi. İstanbul: Cinius Yayınları.Google Scholar
  70. Topçu, B. 2013. İşletmelerde Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi. İstanbul: Kadir Has Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
  71. TÜSİAD. (2008, Şubat). Enterprise Risk Management. Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://tusiad.org/tr/component/k2/item/download/2466_aff40c11210dd71986e25302c58160ca. Accessed 24 Ekim 2016.
  72. Tuten, P. 2018. Enterprise risk management. Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://tusiad.org/tr/component/k2/item/download/2466_aff40c11210dd71986e25302c58160ca.
  73. Wickens, C.D., et al. 2004. An introduction to human factors in engineering, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  74. Yazgan, E., and Ayşe Kucuk Yilmaz. 2019. Prioritisation of factors contributing to human error for airworthiness management strategy with ANP. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology. 91 (1): 78–93.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-11-2017-0245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yazgan, E., and A. Kucuk Yılmaz. In press process. Prioritization of factors that contributed to aircraft maintenance technician error with analytic network process. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anadolu UniversityEskişehirTurkey
  2. 2.Hellenic American UniversityManchester, NHUSA

Personalised recommendations