Advertisement

Hybrid Load Balancing Approach for SDN-Enabled M2M Networks

  • B. AjeethEmail author
  • V. Muthumanikandan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 36)

Abstract

The rising of Internet of things(IoT) has effect in the complex M2M networks interactions which needs to be load balanced effectively and resourcefully to reduce the response time and to improvise network resource utilization and scalability of network-enabled services in the integrated wide-ranging communication networks. Load balancing techniques are vital for M2M network to alleviate the extreme loading of network by predicting the rapid short traffic called bursts. A hybrid load balancing (HLB) system for M2M networks is proposed by the usage of SDN capabilities. Using SDN capability to examine and manage the networks’ traffic, the proposed load balancing scheme able to meet the necessities of different quality of service (QoS) through network interchange appreciation and routing. The HLB scheme improves the response time of 15% and reduces the latency by 20% of SDN-enabled M2M network as compared to other load balancers.

Keywords

SDN Load balancing M2M networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen L, Shen H, Sapra K (2014) RIAL: resource intensity aware load balancing in clouds. IEEE INFOCOM 2014—IEEE conference on computer communications, Toronto, ON, pp 1294–1302Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miao Y, Vural S, Sun Z, Wang N (2016) A unified solution for gateway and in-network traffic load balancing in multihop data collection scenarios. IEEE Syst J 10:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nae V, Prodan R, Fahringer T (2010) Cost-efficient hosting and load balancing of Massively multiplayer online games. In: 11th IEEE/ACM international conference on grid computing, Brussels, pp 9–16Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu L, Chen L, Cai Z, Shen H, Liang Y Pan Y (2016) Stochastic load balancing for virtual resource management in datacenters. IEEE Trans Cloud ComputGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin T, Kuo C, Chang H, Chang W, Lin Y (2016) A parameterized wildcard method based on SDN for server load balancing. In: international conference on networking and network applications (NaNA), Hakodate, pp 383–386Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen Y, Wang L, Chen M, Huang P, Chung P (2018) SDN-enabled traffic-aware load balancing for M2M networks. IEEE Internet of Things J 5:1797–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao H, Qiu C, Zhao C, Shi L (2015)A multicontroller load balancing approach in software-defined wireless networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 11Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han T, Ansari N (2016) A traffic load balancing framework for software-defined radio access networks powered by hybrid energy sources. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 24:1038–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wei P, Dan L, Xiao Y, Lei X, Li S (2016) A dynamic load balancing method of cloud-center based on SDN. China Commun 13:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhong Hong, Fang Yaming, Cui Jie (2017) LBBSRT: An efficient SDN load balancing scheme based on server response time. Future Gener Comput Syst 68:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muthumanikandan V, Valliyammai C (2017) Link failure recovery using shortest path fast rerouting technique in SDN. Wireless Pers Commun 97:2475–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer TechnologyMIT Campus, Anna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.School of Computing Science and EngineeringVIT UniversityChennai CampusIndia

Personalised recommendations